Why do people of faith need evolution to be wrong? What do people of faith need to be wrong?
What is wrong with finding something to be wrong about?
Please reword your question to make sense, please.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
100 Reasons why Evolution is Stupid - Dr. Hovind
- Thread starter Sculelos
- Start date
Why do people of faith need evolution to be wrong? What do people of faith need to be wrong?
What is wrong with finding something to be wrong about?
Please reword your question to make sense, please.
Show me the evolutionary scientist who talks of "kinds". And while you're at it, show me the scientists who distinguishes between microevolution and macroevolution.
outhouse
Atheistically
Abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution.
But if life can change itself, and it factually does! it also makes sense, it could evolve itself "ON"
What's your point? It always tickles my fancy when the debater debates my side unintentionally. It's weird.
Right. The beginning of the life spark and the power required for life has nothing to do with the science of evolution. How smart you are!
I am still very curious about what this means. Please.
outhouse
Atheistically
Micro evolution us often used by creationist to pervert the word "evolution"
And in context, micro evolution is just another name for evolution.
It might interest you that there is no debate about evolution anymore, its been over for a very long time. Creation has been outlawed from public schools for very good reasons, it not science of any shape or form.
outhouse
Atheistically
There is no such thing as life spark. We don't know that power was needed.
Energy stored in chemicals would be sufficient
Micro evolution is not another word for evolution. Evolution is the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms. Usually the developments are something new in the gene.
Micro evolution is a change in the organism of already existing genetic disposition.
Micro evolution is how scientists prove evolution.
Micro evolution is a fact with a whole lot of evidence.
Evolution is a theory with little or no real evidence.
I'm not sure the confusion here. I am referring to the science-deniers among those who claim faith. Those such as the OP who deny the validity of a well-established scientific theory. Why is their faith incapable of dealing with something like this? And since it clearly demonstrates it's not because of the sorts of nonsense that comes from the fraudulent science groups such as AoG, it screams the question, at least to me, what does faith exactly mean to them? Apparently it cannot withstand them needing to rethink their beliefs! And if so, is that faith, or idolatry?
Please answer this.
You do not know life needs power? OK.
Do you listen to yourself? Well established theory? That's like saying popular opinion should rule.
Um, yes.
P.S. Please answer my question. Can your faith withstand the ToE being true? If not, which appears the case, why not?? Please answer me.
What is AoG? ToE?
Answers in Genesis. These folks claiming science: Answers in Genesis - Creation, Evolution, Christian Apologetics
ToE = Theory of Evolution.
(sorry it should have read AiG)
I don't know. But did you see the film? Scientists do the same thing. I am on neither side.
Monk Of Reason
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Scientific theory and a layman theory are not the same thing. A theory as in a guess or hunch is not a scientific theory. The highest reguard any scientific fact can become is a well established theory.
The highest reguard? What is it?
Facts are well established. Theories are theories. Do you have a definition of theory that means fact?
Monk Of Reason
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
A lot of people who are not deeply familiar with the way science works misunderstand the words they use. Theory is an explination of a phenomenon. A fact in science is when something gains so much evidence it becomes preverse to deny it. For example the fact that germs cause illness is just a theory. The fact that the earth rotates the sun and not the other way around is just a theory. Both of these are also facts.
Evolution has compiled so much evidence that it has becomes preverse to deny it. Generally it comes from ignorance, political bias or the most unfortunate, when its drilled into them as children so they are premanetly brainwashed to deny it.
The national academy also explains it well. Its a quick but good read on the subject.
Evolution Resources from the National Academies