• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2/3 Vertebrate Wildlife Gone by 2020

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
Well there can't be that much wildlife that only has 2/3rds of a vertebra.
Honestly I'm disappointed in this post from you. Loss of biodiversity is no joke nore are the other environmental issues we are facing.
 

Nous

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Biodiversity

We are in an era of unprecedented threats to biodiversity. The loss of species is estimated to be running 50 to 500 times higher than background rates found in the fossil record. Fifteen out of 24 important ecosystem services are assessed to be in decline.

Livestock now account for about 20 percent of the total terrestrial animal biomass, and the 30 percent of the earth’s land surface that they now pre-empt was once habitat for wildlife. Indeed, the livestock sector may well be the leading player in the reduction of biodiversity, since it is the major driver of deforestation, as well as one of the leading drivers of land degradation, pollution, climate change,overfishing, sedimentation of coastal areas and facilitation of invasions by alien species. In addition, resource conflicts with pastoralists threaten species of wild predators and also protected areas close to pastures. Meanwhile in developed regions, especially Europe, pastures had become a location of diverse long-established types of ecosystem, many of which are now threatened by pasture abandonment.

Some 306 of the 825 terrestrial ecoregions identified by the Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) -- ranged across all biomes and all biogeographical realms, reported livestock as one of the current threats. Conservation International has identified 35 global hotspots for biodiversity, characterized by exceptional levels of plant endemism and serious levels of habitat loss. Of these, 23 are reported to be affected by livestock production. An analysis of the authoritative World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species shows that most of the world’s threatened species are suffering habitat loss where livestock are a factor.​

ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a0701e/a0701e.pdf

http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.HTM (I was unable to open the paper today.)

Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption:

The consumption of animal-sourced food products by humans is one of the most powerful negative forces affecting the conservation of terrestrial ecosystems and biological diversity. Livestock production is the single largest driver of habitat loss, and both livestock and feedstock production are increasing in developing tropical countries where the majority of biological diversity resides. [. . .] The projected land base required by 2050 to support livestock production in several megadiverse countries exceeds 30–50% of their current agricultural areas. Livestock production is also a leading cause of climate change, soil loss, water and nutrient pollution, and decreases of apex predators and wild herbivores, compounding pressures on ecosystems and biodiversity. It is possible to greatly reduce the impacts of animal product consumption by humans on natural ecosystems and biodiversity while meeting nutritional needs of people, including the projected 2–3 billion people to be added to human population.​

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969715303697
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Overpopulation is a serious threat that must be met with innovation. We must somehow find a way to become less reliant upon the death of other species. I cannot prevent overpopulation, but I can point out that when the population goes up we produce new innovations. Its through innovation that we can secure the future not strictly through preservation, although preservation has a lot of value.

I remember starting a thread about producing new humans who don't need external sources of Vitamin C. We could also have humans who produce their own Omega 3 and other various nutrients.

Wildlife? Um. Lions eat people. Are you going to be the one to put up with lions in your back yard? Its a reasonable question.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'd really more of a resource management issue. At least in my opinion
While that is an issue at any population level,
we humans have enormous impact just by existing.
Moroever, 3rd world people will aspire to our quality
of life, thereby increasing their impact enormously.
Wildlife should all fear for their lives...except cockroaches.
 
Top