He wasn't. The Sermon on the Mount wasn't grab your swords boys where gonna kick some ***.So Jesus was pro weapon, and pro killing, and pro murder.
OK, thanks.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He wasn't. The Sermon on the Mount wasn't grab your swords boys where gonna kick some ***.So Jesus was pro weapon, and pro killing, and pro murder.
OK, thanks.
Good point.How on Earth does that work? I'm stating a claim that people blame mental illness on gun violence. And that's because they do. [...]
And the belief is common enough it's a myth addressed in the book 50 Great Myths of Popular psychology.
View attachment 58047
And here the crazies meet the gun nuts. "Don't take away (my) guns!"They don't say "these violent people are an issue for mental illness." They say "we have to do more to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill."
Cherry picking? In Matthew 10:34 Jesus allegedly also said he's come to bring a sword.He wasn't. The Sermon on the Mount wasn't grab your swords boys where gonna kick some ***.
I really don't know what you're getting at. You made a claim people don't really believe the claims of mental illness being behind gun violence, and I countered that claim.As you may see, the reality is the opposite of what is perceived.
That is one of those unfortunate problems that lets the worst ideas find support among the best ideas.Cherry picking? In Matthew 10:34 Jesus allegedly also said he's come to bring a sword.
That's the nice thing about the bible, you can find a quote that supports your position, no matter how wrong.
And you were probably right.I really don't know what you're getting at. You made a claim people don't really believe the claims of mental illness being behind gun violence, and I countered that claim.
To help to counter the wrong notion that in reality (i.e. by the courts) violent people are often treated as mentally ill. The opposite is the case. The psychopathic killer is an invention of Holywood and has made its way into the public mindset.Now you're throwing in how the mentally ill often end up incarcerated instead of in a care facility they need.
Preach it to the haters! (But not on RF, "no proselytising" rule et al.)At least I cherry pick the peace-loving parts.
What does having a sword for self defense have to do with being pro murder?So Jesus was pro weapon, and pro killing, and pro murder.
OK, thanks.
It was not legal to make them full auto.Are you aware that importers of assault rifles got around the law by installing a stock that linked the pistol grip and stock? It was a huge error my the assault rifle ban to include the pistol grip as an identifying part. Dealers even sold the original stock kits so the buyers could convert them to the original. There were even kits to make semi-auto rifles full auto.
Of a pipe bombing? Or knifing? Or a car run into a building or crowd? Or an airplane flown into a tower? How many people did McVeigh kill with deisel fuel and fertilizer?Exactly. This is why we need to be more careful about who has access to guns in the USA. You might be the next victim.
Imposing restrictions on law abiding people doesn't stop killers. Newsflash: murder is already illegal.So, dead children are just "excuses" for you?
Being gunned down is just "the American way to die"?
And everyone who doesn't want to be shot should get a gun and learn to shoot faster?
Bombs require a lot of research and real motivation and intent to use. The Boston Marathon bombers are an example of how extremism drives religious zealots. Or McVey as a political extremist. Your average teenager doesn't go this far.Of a pipe bombing?
Knifings are done in many places where there is gun control. It can be deadly, but the what is better than guns is you can't outrun a bullet. You can outrun someone with a knife. If kids in the USA had to resort to using knives to killing their classmates there would be fewer deaths.Or knifing?
Another favorite among religious extremists.Or a car run into a building or crowd?
The gold medal of religious extremism. Makes you wonder why God cannot keep his believers in check.Or an airplane flown into a tower?
Hundreds, many children.How many people did McVeigh kill with deisel fuel and fertilizer?
But no need to make murder so damn easy, is it? It's almost as if you like when it happens. I don't understand why conservatives don't want to bother helping to solve this problem. It's like you just don't care that it happens, as long as it's not you.Imposing restrictions on law abiding people doesn't stop killers. Newsflash: murder is already illegal.
If they don't believe it why do they keep repeating it? It's an easy scape goat, and the mentally ill are stigmatized and demonized at many, many levels. Add in the fact there is a vast ocean of people who are armchair psychologists and start attaching violent behavior to what they think they know about something. So they get blamed.
But no need to make murder so damn easy, is it? It's almost as if you like when it happens. I don't understand why conservatives don't want to bother helping to solve this problem. It's like you just don't care that it happens, as long as it's not you.
Not very Christian, is it?
I don't know what that means.
Jesus was pro- sword. They didn't have guns at the time.
Interesting how you didn't answer the questions. I assume that the answers were "yes" to all but you were to coward to really say it.Imposing restrictions on law abiding people doesn't stop killers. Newsflash: murder is already illegal.
Whilst it may not be entirely logical, it seems to me that many of the people who target innocents, or those just in their environment, have anger and resentment as the prime motivation (very heightened above normal), and hence just might target proxies when they cannot target those they would like to seek revenge upon. Given that they can't deal with whatever and have no other solutions in their head. That is quite logical if one wanted to exact revenge but couldn't do so on the appropriate person or people - given that the pain is spread to others inevitably. This for me seems to explain why so many do target large numbers, and doesn't necessarily indicate they have a mental health issue - just issues with others. How much torment do some have to endure before they explode? Not an easy question to answer given we are all different and often can't place ourselves in the positions of others. Access to weapons just makes it so much easier in some countries.For most sane people it is inconceivable that a mass shooter could have had a logical reason for his action, thus, he must have been mentally ill, at least in the moment.
The reverse conclusion, that mentally ill people are violent is your straw man unless you can show that it is held by a majority or at least significant minority.