75 Theses ~ Science Against Evolution

[Evangelicalhumanist]

I'd be interesting in seeing what he understands about it too.

So would I -- but unfortunately there has been no response whatever. This is, unfortunately, not all that surprising.

 

[shunyadragon]

Or the Flying Spaghetti Multiverse, - sure, any of these are less improbable than it simply 'evolving' itself through blind chance

Blind chance has not been objectively observed in the natural course of the cause and effect outcomes, neither has the "Fling Spaghetti Monster," except maybe in Italian science fiction.

 

[Altfish]

The interesting part of this thread for me is that it is perfectly OK to question evolution and Darwin's findings. The same can't be said for creationism.

Oh yes, science welcomes questions and challenges; that's how it gets nearer to explaining the universe and its workings.
Unfortunately, you cannot say that about religious explanations, they are very much set in stone.

 

[gnostic]

The interesting part of this thread for me is that it is perfectly OK to question evolution and Darwin's findings. The same can't be said for creationism.

The same cannot be said about Intelligent Design.

Worse still, Intelligent Design has already been debunked, and considered “pseudoscience”, and yet it still continued to be brought back by the die-hard creationists.