mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
The Catechism is official Catholic Doctrine.
Other opinions are just private opinions.
Yeah, we are playing being right. I can't change you and you can't change me.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Catechism is official Catholic Doctrine.
Other opinions are just private opinions.
So, that's for confirming your "heresy".I don't support capitol punishment.
How disingenuous of you. I post the fact of what Trump clearly said, which I also vividly remember well, and you stoop so low as to post the above instead of even checking out different sources.CNN politics? I just told you you need to get better sources.
Not all predominately Musim countries have that reputation, and some have been our close allies.There is nothing immoral, unCatholic, or unChristian about banning travel from nations that have a high population of terrorists.
I've been teaching it for 15 years now, but as I said before, I teach what the Church teaches.I hope you never teach Catholicism.
You are so confused. Again, the Church allows for personal discernment, and that also is found in the Catechism.You are speaking for Catholicism here by claiming to be a Catholic on your banner.
Now you are clearly not telling the Truth as the Catechism clearly opposes capital punishment and yet you virtually go against that teaching.I accept all that the Church teaches.
Yeah, we are playing being right. I can't change you and you can't change me.
Now you are clearly not telling the Truth as the Catechism clearly opposes capital punishment and yet you virtually go against that teaching.
You are so confused. Again, the Church allows for personal discernment, and that also is found in the Catechism.
Maybe study instead of just spouting nonsense, so I'm leaving this "discussion" with you for a while as you are your own worst enemy.
Oops, I misread your post, so sorry. However, in a previous discussion you still supported it as I commented on it then.How do I go against that teaching?
I accept it.
Oops, I misread your post, so sorry. However, in a previous discussion you still supported it as I commented on it then.
How about climate change?
Either way, I'm outta here for a while.
I don't see Twitter as privately owned, when it's a publicly traded enterprise.Could you rephrase that?
You don't think they should enforce their terms of use?Twitter ought not to have removed Trump.
k'inellClimate change is not Catholic Doctrine, it is leftist propaganda.
When we say privately owned here, we mean it's not state owned. However you are correct in the business sense a company that is publicly traded is not privately owned. Though in the case of Twitter it was owned by Jack Dorsey and Parag Agrawal, and soon by Elon Musk. The company has the right to decide who and what posts on it's platform, and set terms and conditions that users must agree to before use. Trump breached those t&c's.I don't see Twitter as privately owned, when it's a publicly traded enterprise.
I'd like to think the government/state is privately owned by the people.When we say privately owned, we mean it's not state owned.
The Catholic Church opposes abortion and always has because it is murder of the an innocent person.
I'd like to think the government/state is privately owned by the people.
But of course, most of us know how that goes.
It's only murder if it is unlawful, and I think it is a big stretch to call an insentient embryo blastocyst or foetus a person. Also calling an insentient clump pf cells innocent is rather meaningless, one could say the same of toe nail clippings.
It felt like we won back a lot of sanity and some space for warmth and humor with the removal of Donald Trump from the site, and now it’s very possible that he and a number of other pretty ill-intentioned voices will be returning and doing a lot of scary and awful things. It looks like a return to a very sad state of affairs.
I’m not sure I totally buy into people’s fears that under its new ownership, Twitter is going to turn into some sort of hellscape where unpopular views are censored. Even besides this Twitter development, I think people of a certain persuasion tend to demonize Musk without knowing precisely why. I’m not a huge fan of the guy; he attracts a following that tends to idolize “science” as the answer to all the world’s unanswerable questions; he could spend his money on way more meaningful causes. But I don’t know if he is the incarnation of evil and greed we’re led to think.
Roundtable: Should Catholics be part of Elon Musk’s Twitter? | America Magazine
Well said. I agree.Murder has both a legal and a moral
definition.
Each fetus is a living human being with unique DNA.
The stage of life doesn’t change those facts.
I get it - but shouldn't we at least wait to see what changes are to be made before making any decision or trying to shame members of any religion into not partaking of the product?Because we live and move in the public marketplace why should it not be of interest in what changes may bring.
You believe that anyone who supports any coup should be demonized?