Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Be advised the following has full frontal nudity, but believe me it's far from gratuitous. In fact, it goes to the very essence of the message, and the reason for its placement in the Ethics and Morals forum.
Enjoy. (It's only 4 minutes long.)
.
Absolutely: If we're to get to the bottom of society's ills we'll need full Disclotheser.Skwim, you trying to start a movement against wearing clothes?
But I think that would defeat the point. Deliberately drawing attention to themselves gives the town folk to something to be aghast about, which brings out their fear. And irrational, ill conceived fear is what the movie attempts to highlight.They might have been less alarming had they not been marching abreast and singing about naked men.
Had they been quietly hiking in line along the sidewalk, not deliberately making a spectacle of themselves, perhaps nodding greetings to the locals, I think there would have been less alarm.
WTF???
There's a reason that clothing was invented.Men of a certain weight and higher should be required to wear clothes, though. Wouldn't you agree?