Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
It seem that what you saying here is some "God" or something is manipulating quantum mechanics?
May be that is the only level in which creation can take place.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It seem that what you saying here is some "God" or something is manipulating quantum mechanics?
If a scientist comes to the conclusion that there seems to be design in nature, or seems to hint at a 'mind' behind their findings, will they automatically be regarded as bad scientists by the rest of the scientific community? Or must they strictly stick to 'naturalistic' explanations?
Your question reveals a perception many have, that the scientific establishment defends the ToE with what appears to be religious fervor, and displays animosity toward any who dare challenge this unproven theory. This has been discussed in this forum.
I believe the evidence supports this animosity and censorship by evolutionists, evidence also discussed in this forum.
If a scientist comes to the conclusion that there seems to be design in nature, or seems to hint at a 'mind' behind their findings, will they automatically be regarded as bad scientists by the rest of the scientific community? Or must they strictly stick to 'naturalistic' explanations?
Mythology is suppressed over science.
Nothing more and nothing less.
One deals with observable facts, one more time FACTS regarding evolution.
Not ancient mans mythology and allegory.
ToE has more evidence to support it than gravity.A fact is the earth revolves around the sun. The ToE is not a fact, but an unproven theory.
ToE has more evidence to support it than gravity.
There isn't "intelligent falling".
Making assertions is not proof.
Neither is denying or twisting words.Making assertions is not proof.