Is that so?
I don't think I have seen that stated quite that clearly anywhere. Do you have a reference?
I answered "no", mainly because the very concept of free will has never been presented to me in a form that made much sense.
In truth, it looks like a fascinating concept... for a wild tale of speculative fiction with no regard for verisimilitude.
In the sutta Attakari Sutta Buddha response like this
Then a certain brahman approached the Blessed One; having approached the Blessed One, he exchanged friendly greetings. After pleasant conversation had passed between them, he sat to one side. Having sat to one side, the brahman spoke to the Blessed One thus:
“Venerable Gotama, I am one of such a doctrine, of such a view: ‘There is no self-doer, there is no other-doer.’”
[1]
“I have not, brahman, seen or heard such a doctrine, such a view. How, indeed, could one — moving forward by himself, moving back by himself
[2] — say: ‘There is no self-doer, there is no other-doer’? What do you think, brahmin, is there an element or principle of initiating or beginning an action?”
[3]
“Just so, Venerable Sir.”
“When there is an element of initiating, are initiating beings
[4] clearly discerned?”
“Just so, Venerable Sir.”
“So, brahmin, when there is the element of initiating, initiating beings are clearly discerned; of such beings, this is the self-doer, this, the other-doer.
[5]
“What do you think, brahmin, is there an element of exertion
[6] ... is there an element of effort
[7] ... is there an element of steadfastness
[8] ... is there an element of persistence
[9] ... is there an element of endeavoring?”
[10]
“Just so, Venerable Sir.”
“When there is an element of endeavoring, are endeavoring beings clearly discerned?”
“Just so, Venerable Sir.”
“So, brahmin, when there is the element of endeavoring, endeavoring beings are clearly discerned; of such beings, this is the self-doer, this, the other-doer. I have not, brahmin, seen or heard such a doctrine, such a view as yours. How, indeed, could one — moving forward by himself, moving back by himself — say ‘There is no self-doer, there is no other-doer’?”
“Superb, Venerable Gotama! Superb, Venerable Gotama! Venerable Gotama has made the Dhamma clear in many ways, as though he were turning upright what had been turned upside down, revealing what had been concealed, showing the way to one who was lost, or holding up a lamp in the dark: ‘Those who have eyes see forms!’ Just so, the Venerable Gotama has illuminated the Dhamma in various ways. I go to Venerable Gotama as refuge, and to the Dhamma, and to the assembly of monks. From this day, for as long as I am endowed with breath, let Venerable Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone to him for refuge.”
My comment here: There is no permanent self, But as human beings we do do actions out of free will, meaning when we deside what to do we can choose to do right or wrong action. we are not bound to only do one action, so as my understanding we do have free will to choose what to do