A woman's rage

[ChristineM]

I told him he's the product of a society ruined by the American lesbian-feminist lobby...he's a ball-less beta male that believes in toxic masculinity.

And you believe its its fine to watch your sister be sexually abused. I dont know him but guess who would i would prefer as a buddy?

 

[ChristineM]

That isn't a problem. You used a fallacy then missed the point.





The anger of Kav's confirmation as people projected their anger on to the circus.

No fallacy and the one misunderstanding the point is not me?

Not my problem.

 

[Shad]

No fallacy and the one misunderstanding the point is not me?

You used an ad populum fallacy about opinions on the thread.

Not my problem.

Never said it was your problem. You just avoid the subject.

 

[ChristineM]

You used an ad populum fallacy about opinions on the thread.



Never said it was your problem. You just avoid the subject.

No fallacy The idea is to further the recognition that rape, not only is a crime but it hurts, far worse and for much longer than a kick in the nuts.

Why should i not avoid american politics? I am not american, i dont really care about American politics. I do care about at least some of the less empathetic men recogniseing the consequences of rape

 

[Shad]

No fallacy

Yes as you referenced support and opinion as a counter point. Try again.

The idea is to further the recognition that rape, not only is a crime but it hurts, far worse and for much longer than a kick in the nuts.

I already acknowledged this poorly thought out view.

Why should i not avoid american politics? I am not american, i dont really care about American politics.

You are avoid a part of the article you linked.

You not caring about US politics is why you completely miss the point about misplaced anger as you are not paying attention.

 

[Estro Felino]

I do care about at least some of the less empathetic men recognizing the consequences of rape

That Julius is terribly wrong...
most men do understand how awful rape is, because most men would never rape anyone.
he labels all men as potential rapists...he is brainwashed.

 

[ChristineM]

Yes as you referenced support and opinion as a counter point. Try again.



I already acknowledged this poorly thought out view.



You are avoid a part of the article you linked.

You not caring about US politics is why you completely miss the point about misplaced anger as you are not paying attention.

No fallacy, show where i referenced support for the kav/ford thing. Dont worry, ill wait.

Your opinion, a failed opinion at that.

Women get raped all over the world, the us population amounts to just 5% of the world population, forgive me for not giving a toss about who did or didnt do what to someone who amount to 2/7billion+ of the population

 

[Shad]

No fallacy,

Yes as you tried to use the opinions of others as support of your view as a number game. X people agree. So what?

show where i referenced support for the kav/ford thing. Dont worry, ill wait.

I never said you did. I brought up a point about this anger and US politics as it was in the article. You ignored it.

Women get raped all over the world, the us population amounts to just 5% of the world population, forgive me for not giving a toss about who did or didnt do what to someone who amount to 2/7billion+ of the population

I will forgive you for not reading the whole article you linked and only following the parts you like.

 

[ChristineM]

Yes as you tried to use the opinions of others as support of your view as a number game. X people agree. So what?



I never said you did. I brought up a point about this anger and US politics as it was in the article. You ignored it.


I will forgive you for not reading the whole article you linked and only following the parts you like.

Statistics tell a lot but what has this to do with your claim of fallacy?

So i didnt reference support as you claimed. Thank you for being so honest.

Oh wow, condescension, things are hotting up. Thanks for your forgiveness even if it is based on ignorance. Now i would like to see your evidence of your claim.

Look, im sorry if not playing your nitpicking game offends you but there are bigger issues then he said she said.

 

[Shad]

Statistics tell a lot but what has this to do with your claim of fallacy?

Belief in X does not make X true especially when it is just based on what average people think.

So i didnt reference support as you claimed. Thank you for being so honest.

I never mentioned nor claimed you did. I said you ignored what was in the article. Thanks for being dishonest.

Oh wow, condescension, things are hotting up.

Oh please. You distorted what I posted. Condescension is the least which is your due.

Thanks for your forgiveness even if it is based on ignorance. Now i would like to see your evidence of your claim.

Read. The. Article....

Look, im sorry if not playing your nitpicking game offends you but there are bigger issues then he said she said.

Except the article links one issue with the case. All I did was point this out. You do not want to discuss it so stop replying then. Pretty simple concept. Try it.

 

[ChristineM]

Belief in X does not make X true especially when it is just based on average people think.



I never mentioned nor claimed you did. I said you ignored what was in the article. Thanks for being dishonest.



Oh please. You distorted what I posted. Condescension is the least which is your due.



Read. The. Article....



Except the article links one issue with the case. All I did was point this out. You do not want to discuss it so stop replying then. Pretty simple concept. Try it.

The majority of average people.

You never mentioned what?

Yes as you referenced support and opinion as a counter point. Try again.

Distorted this...

I will forgive you for not reading the whole article

The article is followed my many, many tweets, upon which the article is based.

Are you now trying to dictate what i do on a public thread .project that to yourself

 

[Shad]

The majority of average people.

Average people are morons. Next!

You never mentioned what?

Read your own post claiming what I did.

Distorted this...

Nope as I clearly stated what you distorted. You can not even keep your dishonestly consistent. Try again.

The article is followed my many, many tweets, upon which the article is based.

It wasn't a tweet it was in the article itself written by the same dolt babbling about kicking males in the nuts.

Are you now trying to dictate what i do on a public thread .project that to yourself

Nope. I just pointed out you didn't read the article, and still haven't. I pointed out you are ignoring something about this anger and an issue in the article. You do not want to talk about. So stop replying.

For someone that does not want to talk about something you are spending a lot of time talking about it and avoiding talking about while posting to me.

 

[Shaul]

Wtf are you whitering about, i did not write the piece so why blame me for your prejudices?

Many thousands on twitter have applauded the article.and the idea. Some few have been derogatory.

Tell me, why are you opposed to the idea of making rape a more undetstood offence. If kicking you in the balls helps to open your eyes i see no problem with that. There are of course some few that consider the message falling on stoney ground.

You are the one that posted the piece and are the one here “applauding” it. That thousands of sick people want imagining men being kicked in the testicles makes my point, there are many twisted people in this world.

“If kicking you in the balls helps to open your eyes i see no problem with that.” I am sure you don’t. That’s precisely the problem. That sort of attitude is more better than that of a rapist.

 

[ChristineM]

Average people are morons. Next!



Read your own post claiming what I did.




Nope as I clearly stated what you distorted. You can not even keep your dishonestly consistent. Try again.




It wasn't a tweet it was in the article itself written by the same dolt babbling about kicking males in the nuts.



Nope. I just pointed out you didn't read the article, and still haven't. I pointed out you are ignoring something about this anger and an issue in the article. You do not want to talk about. So stop replying.

For someone that does not want to talk about something you are spending a lot of time talking about it and avoiding talking about while posting to me.

Speaking from self knowledge?

I dont care what you clearly stated, i quoted your posts
If you cannot even admit to your own posts when quoted... sheesh. You want post numbers too?

You obviously have not read he whole thing. No wonder you dont get the whole story but would rather cherry pick your own hot potato.

Why are you making assumptions that massage your ego.

I respond to your posts addressed to me, you dont like it then you know the answer.

 

[Shad]

Speaking from self knowledge?

Nope. Just observation including you as per the comment chain where you lose track of the conversation which has links you could use to help. Thanks for establishing you are incompetent.

I dont care what you clearly stated, i quoted your posts

Yet not in every claim such as the claim you made about what I said about a subject. Such as claiming I said you brought up a topic when you clearly didn't. Try again.

If you cannot even admit to your own posts when quoted... sheesh. You want post numbers too?

If you had actually posted the claim you stated I made you would have a point. Instead you reference a different post which had nothing to do with what I comment upon. Try again.

"show where i referenced support for the kav/ford thing. Dont worry, ill wait." -You

I never said anything like it was my response followed by your blunder below

"So i didnt reference support as you claimed. Thank you for being so honest."- You confusing the points about Kav/Ford and my correcting you. Try again. Read the post slowly or ask an adult for help. Reading comprehension? Heard of it.

You obviously have not read he whole thing. No wonder you dont get the whole story but would rather cherry pick your own hot potato.

Yes as I have as I pointed out the Kav/Ford was brought up by the dolt and you thought it was from twitter. Try again.

Why are you making assumptions that massage your ego.

I just point out how horrible wrong you are. Try again

I respond to your posts addressed to me, you dont like it then you know the answer.

Yet you are the one wanting to end the conversation not I. So do it. Stop replying.

 

[ChristineM]

You are the one that posted the piece and are the one here “applauding” it. That thousands of sick people want imagining men being kicked in the testicles makes my point, there are many twisted people in this world.

“If kicking you in the balls helps to open your eyes i see no problem with that.” I am sure you don’t. That’s precisely the problem. That sort of attitude is more better than that of a rapist.

Actually, if you bother to check back through the thread you will find most posters are favourable to the OP, and its link. Only 4 or 5 reject it.

And women are still getting raped, how many sick men are there?

Yes if kicking someone in the nuts saves a woman or girl (or women or girls) being raped, you object to that?

 

[ChristineM]

Nope. Just observation including you as per the comment chain where you lose track of the conversation which has links you could use to help. Thanks for establishing you are incompetent.



Yet not in every claim such as the claim you made about what I said about a subject. Such as claiming I said you brought up a topic when you clearly didn't. Try again.



If you had actually posted the claim you stated I made you would have a point. Instead you reference a different post which had nothing to do with what I comment upon. Try again.

"show where i referenced support for the kav/ford thing. Dont worry, ill wait." -You

I never said anything like it was my response followed by your blunder below

"So i didnt reference support as you claimed. Thank you for being so honest."- You confusing the points about Kav/Ford and my correcting you. Try again. Read the post slowing or ask an adult for help. Reading comprehension? Heard of it.





Yes as I have as I pointed out the Kav/Ford was brought up by the dolt and you thought it was from twitter. Try again.



I just point out how horrible wrong you are. Try again



Yet you are the one wanting to end the conversation not I. So do it. Stop replying.

Seems you fall on to ad hominem when riled.

In quoted your posts, you feel brave enough to quote mine?

Again, i quoted YOUR posts.

I replied to your posts and quoted them? If you didnt mean what you posted that is hardly my problem

What? Read the link, all of it.

 

[Shad]

Seems you fall on to ad hominem when riled.

Hilarious considering I merely turned your own remark about me around. Try again hypocrite

In quoted your posts, you feel brave enough to quote mine?

I did. Try reading.

Again, i quoted YOUR posts.

I did. Try reading

I replied to your posts and quoted them? If you didnt mean what you posted that is hardly my problem/

Nope you merely lost track of a conservation and wont admit you messed up even when I quote you.

What? Read the link, all of it.

I did.

 

[ChristineM]

Hilarious considering I merely turned your own remark about me around. Try again hypocrite



I did. Try reading.



I did. Try reading



Nope you merely lost track of a conservation and wont admit you messed up even when I quote you.



I did.

How pathetic, your posts were quoted,, end of story

 

[Shad]

How pathetic, your posts were quoted,, end of story

I quoted you. I just didn't use the quote function. You are too lazy to read nor confirm anything against your bias. However I will make the effort.

show where i referenced support for the kav/ford thing.

I never said you did. I brought up a point about this anger and US politics as it was in the article. You ignored it.

You never mentioned what?

The last is you falling of the wagon and hitting your head. I told you to read what was posted. You didn't. Instead you continue to bury yourself by your own laziness and stubbornness. Try again silly NPC.