A woman's rage

[Revoltingest]

That's an empty claim you cannot substantiate.
Sure, you first.

The 2nd sentence is disingenuous, given the first.

 

[columbus]

I think you need to carefully re-read the article.

I've been trying to fine a way to quote the crap in that "article". But it's twitter or something and I can't figure out how to quote the feminazi BS.

Women do worse things to men quite commonly. But they have a leg up in the "victim Olympics", so we are expected to just believe them no matter how implausible the accusations.
Tom

 

[columbus]

I don't have testicles that doesn't work for me. Fail.

I liked RF better when you banned us.
Tom

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

I liked RF better when you banned us.
Tom

Um...what?

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

No, quite the contrary.

You and the author are saying that women dislike sex as much as men dislike being kicked in the nuts. I am confident that is not true. Women generally like sex, in my experience. Men dislike being kicked in the nuts, that's pretty universal.

So, no. This is feminazi BS.
Tom

Wrong, as per your usual habit-- what it is saying?

IS THAT WOMEN DO NOT LIKE TO BE FORCED.

It's sad that you missed this point in it's entire.

But, with a near-total lack of empathy on your part? This shouldn't be surprising...

 

[Subduction Zone]

I've been trying to fine a way to quote the crap in that "article". But it's twitter or something and I can't figure out how to quote the feminazi BS.

Women do worse things to men quite commonly. But they have a leg up in the "victim Olympics", so we are expected to just believe them no matter how implausible the accusations.
Tom

You can do a copy and paste of an entire tweet:

 

[Sunstone]

The 2nd sentence is disingenuous, given the first.

I did nothing you yourself did not do in the post I was responding to. You made an insult and then you asked that we quit insulting each other. Now you come back and imply I'm the only one doing what you did. For the second time today, I can't help but laugh at you. Rev, you're transparent.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

... feminazi BS.

That term right there? Tells everyone with Empathy, everything they need to learn about you, and your utter lack of the same.

Sad. And I pity any women who have to deal with you with any regularity.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That term right there? Tells everyone with Empathy, everything they need to learn about you, and your utter lack of the same.

Sad. And I pity any women who have to deal with you with any regularity.

But Rush uses that phrase all of the time. And he is an admirer of the women's movement:

""I love the women's movement — especially when walking behind it."

Could such a person be a misogynist?

 

[Father Heathen]

And even sadder when such powerful analogies cannot get the point over to so many people.

There are some who are genuinely ignorant and out-of-touch, then there are those who simply don't care because they're ghoulish sociopaths.

 

[Revoltingest]

I did nothing you yourself did not do in the post I was responding to. You made an insult and then you asked that we quit insulting each other. Now you come back and imply I'm the only one doing what you did. For the second time today, I can't help but laugh at you. Rev, you're transparent.

Hey, you started it by dissing my English comprehension.
And this pretend laughing stuff...it doesn't affect others in
the way you must be imagining.
.

 

[David T]

A point would be better made without the snarky generalization that
"all men" don't understand.
I notice massive misunderstanding on both opposing sides of this issue.
Of course, each believes the problem lies with the other. One has enmity
instead of empathy for Ford. The other has the same for Kavanaugh.
Neither position is based upon rational thought & evidence....or empathy.
I say they both deserve sympathy, respect & to be heard. But neither
deserves unqualified belief. That requires evidenced cogent argument.

Cautions.....
- I am more empathy challenged than your average neurotypical.
- Anyone who reflexively cries "False equivalency!" at this post is
thereby admitting a dark desire to wear my kilt over their head.

Yea but....

Since i know my history i instantly would have asked for a lie detector test especially in a court of political poupularity which all that really was. I would have easily passed and trust would have been instantly restored and the claimant made to look like an idiot.. As it is doubts remain about kavanaugh in regards to sexual assult. I personally would never let that become a reality. But hey my background is absolute saint like pristine in regard to that particular topic, sexual assult. Kavanaugh on the other hand left doubt on the table about him on regards to that topic and seemed extremely disinterested in Clearing it up.

Only people with something to hide in that type of situation would avoid a lie detector test. Its not a court of law its simply a political popularity contest about a job is all.

On a side note frat boys and sorority girls suck in general.

 

[Revoltingest]

Yea but....

Since i know my history i instantly would have asked for a lie detector test especially in a court of political poupularity which all that really was. I would have easily passed and trust would have been instantly restored and the claimant made to look like an idiot.. As it is doubts remain about kavanaugh in regards to sexual assult. I personally would never let that become a reality. But hey my background is absolute saint like pristine in regard to that particular topic, sexual assult. Kavanaugh on the other hand left doubt on the table about him on regards to that topic and seemed extremely disinterested in Clearing it up.

Only people with something to hide in that type of situation would avoid a lie detector test. Its not a court of law its simply a political popularity contest about a job is all.

On a side note frat boys and sorority girls suck in general.

I still cannot judge Ford or Kavanaugh.
Too little info.
But I believe that both have endured horrors, albeit of different kinds.
Both get my sympathy, without it being about "deserve".

 

[Shad]

​

Comments?

It fails to consider projection of victims' experience on to Kav/Ford Congressional circus creating an emotion feedback loop when people couldn't separate their own experience from Fords and Kavs. They become Ford and their attacker(s) Kav. Lack of acceptance in one case is a lack of acceptance of their own.

Does it help you guys understand?

I already understood it and better than Moxon. He seems like a dolt.

 

[Stevicus]

So how else can it be interpreted?

In the context of your OP, the topic was not about excusing or punishing rape. Rape is a violent crime, and there are laws against it. Unless I explicitly proposed a repeal of such laws (which I didn't), I can't possibly imagine how you reached the conclusion that I was "excusing rape." I interpret that as an insult and a personal attack against me, which is against the rules of the forum, as I understand them.

In any case, I am not a law enforcement officer, prosecutor, or judge, so I wouldn't have the power to "excuse rape" at all.

Your OP seems to bemoan the idea that men are not understanding or empathetic enough towards women who are raped, but the kind of throwaway one-line response you gave to the several paragraphs I wrote points up the root of the problem as to why some men might not be as understanding as you would like them to be. You seem to think that you can just bark at men or kick them in the groin, and that will somehow get us to comply with your demands. If that's what you believe, you couldn't be more wrong, indicating that you're more a part of the problem than part of any solution.

 

[Stevicus]

Unfortunately, this entire mess only further underscores the idea that men end up being at the root of problems for BOTH genders.

You may very well be correct, but the idea of kicking men in the groin to "make them understand" doesn't really help the problem. A lot of men do understand, but if women want good men to help them against other men who are scumbags, they need to know exactly what they're asking for. The OP implies that men don't really understand other men, which is a crock of BS. Of course, men understand other men. It goes with the territory.

 

[Revoltingest]

You may very well be correct, but the idea of kicking men in the groin to "make them understand" doesn't really help the problem. A lot of men do understand, but if women want good men to help them against other men who are scumbags, they need to know exactly what they're asking for. The OP implies that men don't really understand other men, which is a crock of BS. Of course, men understand other men. It goes with the territory.

There was no advocating groin kicking.
It was just an analogy, albeit one off the mark.
From The Simpsons to Big Bang Theory to Murphy Brown....attacking men's groins is typically
accompanied by a laugh track. Rape isn't comedy....except for that Law & Order show.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

There was no advocating groin kicking.
It was just an analogy, albeit one off the mark.
From The Simpsons to Big Bang Theory to Murphy Brown....attacking men's groins is typically
accompanied by a laugh track. Rape isn't comedy....except for that Law & Order show.

SVU is not a comedy show. It can be hard to watch at times.

 

[Revoltingest]

SVU is not a comedy show. It can be hard to watch at times.

But mirth by the cops is had at times when male sexual assault is the subject.
The point here is that it's often treated dismissively, or even used as a threat to
coerce some concession or confession. And yes, this happens on SVU.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

But mirth by the cops is had at times when male sexual assault is the subject.
The point here is that it's often treated dismissively, or even used as a threat to
coerce some concession or confession. And yes, this happens on SVU.

Yeah, I see what you mean about the interrogations. :/