According to Science - You are a Satanic Being

[exchemist]

And your own. But then one would ask if it's reasonable to waste one's own time .

Theorist?

 

[Orias]

Theorist?

Maybe. If that's so then we are giving guys like Einstein way too much credit .

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Stop trying to get me to break the rules. If you really wanted to have that discussion you would already have obliged to my request but instead you continue this mindless indulgence.

Oh, I get it, you think you're clever and original and no one has ever tried that tactic before! How adorable.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

but all scientists will agree the probability is equivalent to zero,

Name 3.

 

[Orias]

Anyways, I really need to sleep. I'll try and reply when I'm back on in a day or so. No guarantee I'll read through all the notifications. I had over 100 from just the other day and I am very busy. If you want me to address something specific please message me, like I asked .

 

[Orias]

Oh, I get it, you think you're clever and original and no one has ever tried that tactic before! How adorable.

Like I said, you claim to want something, you clearly don't. I'm glad you think I'm cute but to be honest I'm into woman.

 

[Orias]

Name 3.

Pretty much everyone at NASA.

Erik Zackrisson
Andrew Benson
Ali Binazir

There's a lot. Too many to name.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

How am I refusing to play when I asked you to message me and show me what you want me to address? You are the one refusing, not me.

LAME DUDE

The questions are at the end of the link to YOUR THREAD, a thread you could have re-read start to finish in the time you've been whining about it. If you refuse to participate in the expected and generally accepted manner of the forum, you don't get to criticise other people for refusing to play by your made up special snowflake rules.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Pretty much everyone at NASA.

Erik Zackrisson
Andrew Benson
Ali Binazir

There's a lot. Too many to name.

Any actual quotes to them saying what you say they're saying?

 

[Orias]

You're still talking about a different thread in this thread that's a direct and will full breaking of the rules .

 

[Orias]

Any actual quotes to them saying what you say they're saying?

Yea there's entire articles and scientific papers. I'm assuming you can feed yourself. So you can easily verify what I said. Goodnight .

 

[Valjean]

Well, certain "beings" and existential structures produce light. So I mean, without them we wouldn't be able to see, or probably even exist

The Sun emits light, and did so long before there were any creatures that could see.
Our sight utilizes sunlight. Whether other creatures emit light or not doesn't seem to have anything to do with anything, and if this biophotonic light is UV we wouldn't be able to see it, anyway.

"Light is light", right. Buts it not. You can't even see most of it. And can you say certainly it existed before any human or religion? Do you even know where science comes from?

So what's your point? How's this relate to satanic beings?
I can't say for certain that the world even exists, but the weight of evidence points to a world -- and a Sun existing before the Earth coalesced.
And science is an extremely successful research modality used by humans.

Well, no, and yes. It's not just a physical entity. It's more of an energy, or a circumstance or scenario. If it is an entity, it's us.

OK, so now you're saying that the satanic entities are us; that there is no cosmic Evil One?

I have actually supported this greatly. It's common knowledge we are carbon based life forms. And carbon based life forms emit a special type of light called "biophoton" which is Greek in origin and means "life light". It's light invisible to the eye (for the most part )

This biophoton emission is questionable, and if animals do generate UV light, what does that have to do with anything? We aren't "made of" biophotons.
I'm not contesting that we're carbon based or alive. I just can't understand how these photon things and Satans thing fits in.

You don't understand what the numerical value of 666 has to do with occultism more specifically related to Satanism and Satan, and how that relates to our existence?

No, I don't understand how a number in Christian mythology has anything to do with our existence. We existed long before there was any Christian folklore, and I'm sure there are many different numbers considered significant in many different religions.

I don't see how occultism has anything to do with our existence

Its pretty simple. It implies that both Jesus and Satan to are referred to as light, which we are made of. Light we can see and light we cannot see (darkness).

So what does this have to do with anything?
Wood floats. A duck floats. Are ducks made of wood?
Jinn are beings of light. You say mammals emit light. Is my cat a Jinn?

Well the disagreeable nature has everything to with this "religious folklore" as it epitomizes the nature of Satan.

So are we back to Satan as a tangible entity again?

Why can't we just say we evolved as a naturally irascible species? Why all this religious mumbo-jumbo, numerology and such?

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

You're still talking about a different thread in this thread that's a direct and will full breaking of the rules .

Where's it say that?

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Yea there's entire articles and scientific papers. I'm assuming you can feed yourself. So you can easily verify what I said. Goodnight .

So we're just meant to find articles that support your claims for you? Sure, why not?

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Why all this religious mumbo-jumbo, numerology and such?

See also: apophenia, attempt to co-opt science-y sounding terms to bolster woo claims, version 363.672

 

[Valjean]

I get this from years of scholarly work and research and studying the "forbidden" and having discussions based in many aspects of science, religion, philosophy and even politics.

I think you've been studying woo and manufacturing apophenic connections between a mixture of facts, speculation and folklore.

The evidence that suggest our being defies existence isn't consistent in calculation but all scientists will agree the probability is equivalent to zero, the most consistent I've seen is odds of 1 out of 100billion.

The odds of our existence are 100%, inasmuch as we do exist. The odds of our coming into existence cannot be calculated, as so many variables are unknown and our sample size is a whopping 1.
How we came into existence is explained by science. No occult magic or invisible beings required.

So we're just meant to find articles that support your claims for you? Sure, why not?

I can't even figure out what he's claiming.

 

[ChristineM]

Interesting. Thanks. Although it doesn't make much sense

616 (number) - Wikipedia

Let's not forget that October used to also be the 8th month. So it is possible. I love some etymology.

It actually makes perfect sense but it doesn't comply with your preconceptions.

The bible is wrong and you copied the error

 

[ChristineM]

Basically, it's light. It's in everything we can observe. Even darkness.

One cannot observe light, photons are far too small, travel too fast and vibrate at much too high a frequency.

We can however see the source of light and its effects.

 

[Jumi]

The carbon atom has the atomic number 6. The atom is made of 6 electrons, 6 protons, and 6 neutrons.

Not always. Just on average.

The Latin words "Christ" and "Lucifer" both essentially mean "bearer of light".

Actually they mean anointed and lightbringer. Though the latter was used in reference to the former.

"Satan" translates to "adversary" or "opposition", so we know Satan is definitely not agreeable.

Does that mean satanists have to espouse ideas that are not agreeable, for it's own sake?

 

[BSM1]

Looks like we have our stand-in for popeadope.

Hold the phone, has anybody ever seen PopeaDope and Orias together in the same room? Coincidence? Hmm....