Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You hear this phrase used a lot by politicians.
What does this mean to you?
I typically feel the need to verify anything a politician says...You hear this phrase used a lot by politicians.
What does this mean to you?
I don't believe politicians are doing science any favors.You hear this phrase used a lot by politicians.
What does this mean to you?
When politicians use it?
You hear this phrase used a lot by politicians.
What does this mean to you?
Typically it means, "according to the majority or concensus of scientists."
Yeah, but that's really not what it should mean. Science shouldn't be about consensus IMO.
What about politicians who are also scientists?I don't believe politicians are doing science any favors.
What about politicians who are also scientists?
When politicians use it, it usually means...You hear this phrase used a lot by politicians.
What does this mean to you?
But it is. If there is no scientific consensus, you can't say what is "according to science" and what is not. Rival theories contend during the process of doing science but eventually things settle down and a consensus forms. Any such consensus is never final, however. New data can always overturn it.Yeah, but that's really not what it should mean. Science shouldn't be about consensus IMO.
Merkel has an ScD in physics.Now theres a conflict of interest, the only one i know was maggie thatcher who as a scientist invented angel delight (nuf said) and as a politician ****ed the country so hard that its still not complete recovered
I don't know. Do they use science to manipulate the public?What about politicians who are also scientists?
Merkel has an ScD in physics.