Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I really enjoyed my Joseph Campbell days.A fine perspective on the myth is given in the book, "The Myth of the Godess: Evolution of an Image," which draws on Joseph Campbell and other scholarly work to analyze the meaning of the symbols. In a nutshell it presents the story as about a coming into conscious being. In the garden of Eden, man and God live as one and there is harmony. What is regarded as a waking from this condition in Western thought is the opposite: in becoming self-conscious, man forgets the life of the garden and sets about shaping the world to his own ends, making an antagonist of God.
The Myth of the Goddess: Evolution of an Image: Jules Cashford, Anne Baring, Laurens Van Der Post: 9780140192926: Comparative Religion: Amazon Canada
I too found Campbell's work to be valuable...but I think he (and others) try/tried to hard to make all mythology fit into Freud and Jung and a purely psychological perspective, when--while they do have some valuable insight--one needs to look at the social and sociological (economic, political...) aspects as well. And I never quite got the idea that all mythology in the world traces back to the Middle East 8-12 thousand years ago...I really enjoyed my Joseph Campbell days.
It was really my first introduction to the ideas of myth and metaphor.
I read all of the stories when i was a child and then he just put them all into perspective for me.
A friend of mine calls Campbell's books "eye candy".
....made a sinner out of you and me.
History or allegory?
What is this story about?
All perspectives welcome.
nay....none of the aboveHer bite was to take adams possession by desiring his submission. Through this she got jealous of having more, Adam's love to God. Knowing that she could possess adam's submission and give herself's in return, sounds like she knew what is good and what is evil - for her. Both got blinded from the possession (poison) of their submission (the snake). Throuhg this both desire the other's love to God. They were ashamed because Gods love would made them live eternally. Through this event life of decay was made to exist. A life in which each one has to restore what they did because we all will certainly sin for any generation. ... So it says, as i think.
Yes i would agree there were some draw backs to the ideology.I too found Campbell's work to be valuable...but I think he (and others) try/tried to hard to make all mythology fit into Freud and Jung and a purely psychological perspective, when--while they do have some valuable insight--one needs to look at the social and sociological (economic, political...) aspects as well. And I never quite got the idea that all mythology in the world traces back to the Middle East 8-12 thousand years ago...
and he pointed out that Eve is a clone?Yes i would agree there were some draw backs to the ideology.
When i studied Campbell i was young and naive to the issues such as those you mention.
His worked helped me, when i got what i could from it i moved on.
I see the story as being able to tell us something from the body, mind and spirit perspectives.
Campbell focused on the mind for the most part, but often talked about following your bliss, so there was a little spirit mixed in with his writings.
No fault incurred?nay....none of the above
Eve was truly curious
Adam saw that she survived the taste and was also curious
but no one lied in the garden
it all played as it should have
I would imagine if this would have been mentioned by Campbell it would have been in the context of a discussion on duality.and he pointed out that Eve is a clone?
Adam's twin sister?
not born of woman......no navel
none at allNo fault incurred?
nay....none of the above
Eve was truly curious
Adam saw that she survived the taste and was also curious
but no one lied in the garden
it all played as it should have
he must be curious enough to risk death.....to know
It played as it SHOULD have....nothing went wrongIs being ignorant the same as telling a lie? I think its not. I wonder in which line your interpreted a lie from one of those.
What kind of taste exactly you speak about?
Of course it played as it did. Else we wouldnt be here.
Its your right to say its a lie.It played as it SHOULD have....nothing went wrong
a lie is a lie....
even if you believe what you said.....even if you think you understand.....
therefore, take heed that you are not deceived
trust no one
question everything