Was he really great, or a barbarian?
njcl Active Member Jun 12, 2005 #2 both i suppose,well to conquer and hold onto land requires greatness and ruthlessness...i watched a programme on hanibal,wow what an intelligent strategic fighter he was
both i suppose,well to conquer and hold onto land requires greatness and ruthlessness...i watched a programme on hanibal,wow what an intelligent strategic fighter he was
michel Administrator Emeritus Staff member Jun 12, 2005 #3 He seems to have no better nor worse than others of his time; as njcl put it, ruthless, but a great tactician. Here is a link to a biography:- http://www.livius.org/aj-al/alexander/alexander00.html
He seems to have no better nor worse than others of his time; as njcl put it, ruthless, but a great tactician. Here is a link to a biography:- http://www.livius.org/aj-al/alexander/alexander00.html