• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Almost 1 in 4 California foster children is on psychiatric meds

CheerLeaderDana

New Member
http://webspecial.mercurynews.com/druggedkids/

Are psychiatrists stupid, evil, greedy or all three?

What do you think of this? Do these children deserve better? Would athletic and music programs be better alternative to meds? I feel like the psychiatric industry is stealing the childhoods of these kids.

Wouldn't you want your children to be active and healthy instead of sedentary and diabetic?
 

ThirtyThree

Well-Known Member
http://webspecial.mercurynews.com/druggedkids/

Are psychiatrists stupid, evil, greedy or all three?

What do you think of this? Do these children deserve better? Would athletic and music programs be better alternative to meds? I feel like the psychiatric industry is stealing the childhoods of these kids.

Wouldn't you want your children to be active and healthy instead of sedentary and diabetic?

I hope you do not become a parent of disabled children who require medication to be able to lead healthy and productive lives.
 
I hope you do not become a parent of disabled children who require medication to be able to lead healthy and productive lives.

There is a question of whether or not such drugs are being over-prescribed though. I'd say that this is almost certainly true.

They are often used as a quick fix, rather than trying to address the broader causes of the problem.

Are psychiatrists stupid, evil, greedy or all three?


While some are greedy, it is probably a mistake to look at this as the cause of overmedication. There is a system that is creating the demand.

Drug companies want to sell their products, and like to talk them up as a cure for all sorts of ills. Many of the conditions that such drugs are prescribed for are disorders which require subjective evaluation rather than something that can be determined by a yes/no test. Children do have behavioural issues also, and parents seek a cure for these and medication can be an appealing option and may practically demand it from their doctor. Medical 'best practice' can also be incorrect, so even knowledgeable and ethical doctors can be part of the problem.

Putting it all on greedy, stupid or evil psychiatrists is an oversimplification.

What do you think of this? Do these children deserve better? Would athletic and music programs be better alternative to meds? I feel like the psychiatric industry is stealing the childhoods of these kids.

I would guess that the majority of children on psych meds would be better served with a different approach. The problem is that this different approach is not always very easy to implement. As someone who was diagnosed with ADHD myself, I'm not sure it should even be considered a disorder (not that the symptoms aren't real, or that some children wouldn't benefit from medication). Many of the 'symptoms' are actually beneficial in many situations.

The problem is less with the brain, and more with the environment in which the child is being forced to operate. This is where we are really failing these kids. School is a very unnatural environment, sit still, be quiet, read, write. Some people do well in this environment, others do not. For reasons of economics and efficiency, there is a one size fits all approach to education that follows a centuries old model and doesn't necessarily work for all children. If you have to medicate a child to attend school, then perhaps this child's education would be better served in a different environment.

Many psychological conditions are caused by exposure to a particular environment, the problem is it is often easier to medicate than to change the environment. For pre-existing conditions, therapeutic solutions are also probably more effective for most people, but are expensive and hard to access.

So while some children definitely do benefit from such medications, most would be better served with other solutions. Providing these other solutions may prove more difficult in reality though.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
As many know, I was once in the business of psychotherapist landlording.
I got to know many psychiatrists, analysts, social workers, psychologists, & patients.
My perspective....
Head shrinking is a difficult field, with competing views, imprecision, many unknowns, great individual variation, & much experimentation needed to find the best way to handle problems. The field is a work in progress, with mixed results. Practicioners do the best they can (generally) with limited time, cooperation & resources. Drugs are incredibly useful, allowing some people their only option to function normally. But when & which of how much drug is always a thorny issue.
We should argue about public policy, but demonizing them is wrong.
 
Top