An impossible miracle is possible by a miracle

[It Aint Necessarily So]

Let us assume that walking on water is impossible. But it is possible if a miracle has happened. Hence, walking on water is possible.

This is incoherent, meaning that its parts don't cohere, don't fit or work together but rather, don't fit or contradict one another. You've violated the principle of noncontradiction by defining something as both impossible and possible at the same time. It can only be one of those.

Shortly: an impossible miracle is possible through a miracle. Did I prove miracles?

No. Remember, proving is a cooperative process involving a teacher offering a proof and a student understanding the proof and finding it compelling. Have you done that? If not, you have proved nothing.

Never say No without any logical explanation why you are saying No.

Agreed. My logical explanation for answering no to your question is because it is an accurate report that you proved nothing to me.

Only God can say No.

No again. Perhaps in your mind, but I don't share your beliefs or means of arriving at them. My map of reality contains no gods, certainly none that speak.

You are not sure; you have just suggested that No.

This is incorrect. I am absolutely sure that you have proven nothing to me.

It is trolling, my friend.

No again. Trolling is attempting to aggravate others.

Nobody is wrong until proven wrong; prove me wrong and then say No.

Correct on the first part. Nobody is known to be wrong until proven wrong. Nothing is impossible known to be until proven impossible. Nobody is known to be guilty until proven guilty.

Regarding the second part, there is no need to prove to you or anybody else that you are wrong about proving anything to me. Why don't you prove that you convinced me that you were correct but that I'm lying about it or that I knew but have now forgotten you proof, or some other reason why I deny it.

Nothing is a proof because you claim it is. It is a proof because it convinces prepared minds. This is analogous to claiming that a joke is funny when nobody laughs at it.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Damn it. Ban threat again.

Just explain why my words are trolling.

 

[questfortruth]

Just explain why my words are trolling.

Forget it. Parents taught me what saying one simple word No is trolling. Ban the parents, not me.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Forget it. Parents taught me what saying one simple word No is trolling. Ban the parents, not me.

Can you prove that what you were taught is right/true/correct? If not then you are trolling.

 

[questfortruth]

Can you prove that what you were taught is right/true/correct? If not then you are trolling.

I trust my parents.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I trust my parents.

I don't. Now prove me wrong.

 

[questfortruth]

I don't. Now prove me wrong.

If you have different parents, I cannot change your opinion. The basic opinions are formed in childhood.

 

[Spirit of Light]

If you have different parents, I cannot change your opinion. The basic opinions are formed in childhood.

My views and opinions have been formed from my childhood until today now as a 45 years old man i have different opinions than i had as a teenager.
Life taught me many things, one thing I learned, not to be stuck in the past opinions when the world moves forward.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

If you have different parents, I cannot change your opinion. The basic opinions are formed in childhood.

And can be changed in some cases as an adult, other culture couldn't change,

 

[Fool]

Let us assume that walking on water is impossible. But it is possible if a miracle has happened. Hence, walking on water is possible. Shortly: an impossible miracle is possible through a miracle.
Did I prove miracles? So, both God and angels? Never say No without any logical explanation why you are saying No. Only God can say No. You are not sure; you have just suggested that No.
It is trolling, my friend. Could you prove me wrong and then say No? Do not say No without any disproof. Are you All-knowing God? Nobody is wrong until proven wrong; prove me wrong and then say No.

One has taught this habit in school to me. Parents as well. It is a nice habit to say "No, because...." instead of one simple word No. Latter is trolling. Parents taught me what saying one simple word No is trolling. Ban the parents, not me. I trust my parents. If you have different parents, I cannot change your opinion. The basic opinions are formed in childhood.

The era of miracles has begun, look:

how does walking on water be of service to anyone in need?

in you cosmology, even satan can work wonders but how is that of any service to those in need?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Shortly: an impossible miracle is possible through a miracle.

So really, an impossible possible miracle is a bit like a married bachelor.

Did I prove miracles?

lol, no....

Instead, I'ld say you are living upto expectation. Again.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Definition of trolling: to say "you wrong" without any logic.

Actually, no... that's not what trolling is at all.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Nobody is wrong until proven wrong, prove me wrong and then say No.

You have that exactly backwards.

You claiming that you have proven something does not mean that you have proven something "until shown otherwise".

That is retarded.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

It is a nice habit to say "No, because...." instead of one simple word No. Latter is trolling.

What is asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Let us assume that walking on water is impossible. But it is possible if a miracle has happened. Hence, walking on water is possible. Shortly: an impossible miracle is possible through a miracle.
Did I prove miracles? So, both God and angels? Never say No without any logical explanation why you are saying No. Only God can say No. You are not sure; you have just suggested that No.
It is trolling, my friend. Could you prove me wrong and then say No? Do not say No without any disproof. Are you All-knowing God? Nobody is wrong until proven wrong; prove me wrong and then say No.

One has taught this habit in school to me. Parents as well. It is a nice habit to say "No, because...." instead of one simple word No. Latter is trolling. Parents taught me what saying one simple word No is trolling. Ban the parents, not me. I trust my parents. If you have different parents, I cannot change your opinion. The basic opinions are formed in childhood.

The era of miracles has begun, look:

If miracles were really possible, you would stop posting so many bizarre threads.

 

[questfortruth]

If miracles were really possible, you would stop posting so many bizarre threads.

It is your feeling. There is nothing wrong. I love people, people love me. No problemo.

 

[QuestioningMind]

Let us assume that walking on water is impossible. But it is possible if a miracle has happened. Hence, walking on water is possible. Shortly: an impossible miracle is possible through a miracle.
Did I prove miracles? So, both God and angels? Never say No without any logical explanation why you are saying No. Only God can say No. You are not sure; you have just suggested that No.
It is trolling, my friend. Could you prove me wrong and then say No? Do not say No without any disproof. Are you All-knowing God? Nobody is wrong until proven wrong; prove me wrong and then say No.

One has taught this habit in school to me. Parents as well. It is a nice habit to say "No, because...." instead of one simple word No. Latter is trolling. Parents taught me what saying one simple word No is trolling. Ban the parents, not me. I trust my parents. If you have different parents, I cannot change your opinion. The basic opinions are formed in childhood.

The era of miracles has begun, look:

Looks like you got it completely backwards yet AGAIN. Never say YES without any PROOF. Simply claiming YES without any proof is trolling.

 

[CharmingOwl]

I believe that miracles can be attributed to many kinds of deities. Ancestral spirits, gods, and other things as well. I would not want to immediately convert to Christianity because of this, although angels and demons do exist and I know occultists that work with them.

 

[blü 2]

Let us assume that walking on water is impossible. But it is possible if a miracle has happened. Hence, walking on water is possible.

I don't assume walking on water is impossible. It's been done with special footware many times. If you're saying Jesus used special footware, then your problem is lack of evidence, not the walking itself.

an impossible miracle is possible through a miracle.

No, an impossible miracle is impossible by your own definition.

Did I prove miracles?

Of course not.

To do that, first you'd have to give a very clear definition of a 'miracle' (which you haven't done), then you'd have to get us impartial onlookers to agree to it, then you'd have to give a satisfactory demonstration of a miracle in reality.

If you wish to take that path, be my guest.

Meanwhile, I suggest you don't confuse yourself with word-games.

 

[Suave]

Let us assume that walking on water is impossible. But it is possible if a miracle has happened. Hence, walking on water is possible. Shortly: an impossible miracle is possible through a miracle.
Did I prove miracles? So, both God and angels? Never say No without any logical explanation why you are saying No. Only God can say No. You are not sure; you have just suggested that No.
It is trolling, my friend. Could you prove me wrong and then say No? Do not say No without any disproof. Are you All-knowing God? Nobody is wrong until proven wrong; prove me wrong and then say No.

One has taught this habit in school to me. Parents as well. It is a nice habit to say "No, because...." instead of one simple word No. Latter is trolling. Parents taught me what saying one simple word No is trolling. Ban the parents, not me. I trust my parents. If you have different parents, I cannot change your opinion. The basic opinions are formed in childhood.

The era of miracles has begun, look:

As far as I know, your notion of mordaciously walking on water is indeed possible by God if we were indeed living in a simulated universe whereby the rules governing the nature of our simulated universe were possibly disrupted or locally altered temporarily by the Programmer of our virtual reality world.