• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

An interesting article about hacking McDonalds ice cream machines and the right to repair

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
They Hacked McDonald’s Ice Cream Machines—and Started a Cold War | WIRED

This is a long article, too long to quote, so I'll just give a brief summary.

Apparently, this enterprising young couple, after attempting to start their own frozen yogurt concession, learned quite a bit about Taylor ice cream machines and how unreliable they are. They also were able to figure out that there was a secret menu accessible by a code, which had many features and information which is not available to the end user. Apparently, only authorized service personnel were allowed to know this, but somehow this couple was able to find out.

They were able to learn more about the operations of these Taylor machines, and in the process, they developed a product called "Kytch," which was a device which could be used to override the secret code and access the secret menu for the user. They did this with Taylor's apparent knowledge and consent, at least according to one of the developers of Kytch.

They started selling these devices to McDonalds franchise owners, who apparently have been frustrated by their ice cream machines constantly breaking down. Apparently it's become a national meme, about McDonalds ice cream machines breaking down. The problem is that the machines, described as "overengineered," are very finicky and fragile, where the slightest thing could cause it to stop working. Further compounding the problem is that Taylor has a select group of repair people authorized to work on the machines. The end user isn't allowed to call anyone else, other than the approved repair people. Some of the repairs could have been easily made by the end user if they had access to the "secret menu" on the machine which is only available to the authorized repair people.

This device overrode all of that, but upon learning that franchisee operators were using it, McDonald's put out an email ordering them to cease-and-desist, warning that it would void the warranty on the machine and could cause human injury (although that claim is disputed by the makers of Kytch). Now, the company owners are suing both McDonalds and Taylor. (The article mentioned that Taylor also supplies the grills for McDonalds.)

But it's hard to say what a lawsuit would do, as noted in the final paragraphs:

As for Nelson and O’Sullivan, they have no illusions that their legal efforts will ultimately protect Kytch from McDonald’s and Taylor’s efforts to destroy it. In one of our final conversations, O’Sullivan admitted that he saw this very article as perhaps a postmortem of his company after it has been successfully murdered by the fast-food superpowers. “You’re kind of writing our obituary,” O’Sullivan told me.

At times, he seemed to acknowledge the admittedly low stakes of Kytch's story, the cutthroat battles his tiny startup has fought and continues to fight over such a trivial thing as a fast-food ice cream cone. “We want the world to know this because it’s such a ... I mean, this is about ice cream!” O’Sullivan said at one point with exasperation.

But at other moments, he described Kytch’s story as a kind of David and Goliath right-to-repair struggle, or even in grander terms: a valiant effort to fix a very noncritical but ubiquitous piece of the world’s infrastructure. An effort that had been defeated not by the flaws of that machine but by the people controlling it—some of whom would rather it remain broken.

“There’s the ice cream machine,” O’Sullivan says darkly, “and then there’s the machine behind the machine.” They haven’t found the secret code to crack that one yet.

I never realized there could be so much intrigue in the ice cream machine business.

But it does seem that there's a larger issue about the right to repair. Does the end user have a right to repair something he/she bought from a company? Shouldn't they at least have access to the information that the machine is ostensibly designed to convey? What's with the secret passcode and menu that no one is allowed to see and doesn't appear in any of the service manuals?

I remember when my check engine light was on, I took it to a mechanic I knew. He hooked it up to his computer, and the code said "see dealer." I took it to the dealer, and they said I needed a new fuel pump. But what was this "see dealer" nonsense? The mechanic I knew could have changed out the fuel pump.

Then they wonder why people don't trust capitalists and turn to socialism.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
They Hacked McDonald’s Ice Cream Machines—and Started a Cold War | WIRED

This is a long article, too long to quote, so I'll just give a brief summary.

Apparently, this enterprising young couple, after attempting to start their own frozen yogurt concession, learned quite a bit about Taylor ice cream machines and how unreliable they are. They also were able to figure out that there was a secret menu accessible by a code, which had many features and information which is not available to the end user. Apparently, only authorized service personnel were allowed to know this, but somehow this couple was able to find out.

They were able to learn more about the operations of these Taylor machines, and in the process, they developed a product called "Kytch," which was a device which could be used to override the secret code and access the secret menu for the user. They did this with Taylor's apparent knowledge and consent, at least according to one of the developers of Kytch.

They started selling these devices to McDonalds franchise owners, who apparently have been frustrated by their ice cream machines constantly breaking down. Apparently it's become a national meme, about McDonalds ice cream machines breaking down. The problem is that the machines, described as "overengineered," are very finicky and fragile, where the slightest thing could cause it to stop working. Further compounding the problem is that Taylor has a select group of repair people authorized to work on the machines. The end user isn't allowed to call anyone else, other than the approved repair people. Some of the repairs could have been easily made by the end user if they had access to the "secret menu" on the machine which is only available to the authorized repair people.

This device overrode all of that, but upon learning that franchisee operators were using it, McDonald's put out an email ordering them to cease-and-desist, warning that it would void the warranty on the machine and could cause human injury (although that claim is disputed by the makers of Kytch). Now, the company owners are suing both McDonalds and Taylor. (The article mentioned that Taylor also supplies the grills for McDonalds.)

But it's hard to say what a lawsuit would do, as noted in the final paragraphs:





I never realized there could be so much intrigue in the ice cream machine business.

But it does seem that there's a larger issue about the right to repair. Does the end user have a right to repair something he/she bought from a company? Shouldn't they at least have access to the information that the machine is ostensibly designed to convey? What's with the secret passcode and menu that no one is allowed to see and doesn't appear in any of the service manuals?

I remember when my check engine light was on, I took it to a mechanic I knew. He hooked it up to his computer, and the code said "see dealer." I took it to the dealer, and they said I needed a new fuel pump. But what was this "see dealer" nonsense? The mechanic I knew could have changed out the fuel pump.

Then they wonder why people don't trust capitalists and turn to socialism.
It's sorta Ike that with my ONN TV. They (UbreakWefix)will refuse to repair it unless it's registered with the manufacturer.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
They want.
But others have.
They imagine that a powerful government
has the power to do everything that's right.
Government & people will be good & fair.

It's never because they can't fix machines.

I think you may be misreading them.

I wasn't saying it was because they can't fix machines. It's because of the underhanded shenanigans they're able to get away with.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I think you may be misreading them.
Hey, I'm just going by what they post here.
I wasn't saying it was because they can't fix machines. It's because of the underhanded shenanigans they're able to get away with.
They know what they hate about capitalism.
But I recommend applying more thought than
just ditching it for a dream that's faired so
poorly when tried. Things to hate there too.
 
Last edited:

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Hey, I'm just going by what they post here.

They know what they hate about capitalism.
But I recommend applying more thought than
just ditching it for a dream that's faired so
poorly when tried.

Still, it sounds like a good way of dealing with these dishonest companies and their slipshod operations.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Still, it sounds like a good way of dealing with these dishonest companies and their slipshod operations.
My approach is to deal with companies who offer better products.
Note that under socialism, such a choice is less available.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I think its not a matter of socialism versus capitalism.

Interchangeable parts are one of the few things that help to civilize any economic system. They're installing punishment software that punishes you for using a competing repair service. When I buy something I never manifest assent to punishment and assume the right to repair. I expect to own the product unless the product is leased.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
My approach is to deal with companies who offer better products.
Note that under socialism, such a choice is less available.

You could still have choice under socialism. I'm just advocating that private companies be placed under greater scrutiny and control. Especially since they seem to have a need to expend some of their profits on lawyers, because they end up having to go to court. Because they can't settle their own problems by themselves. They need the government to interfere and deal with their corporate messes.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
You could still have choice under socialism. I'm just advocating that private companies be placed under greater scrutiny and control. Especially since they seem to have a need to expend some of their profits on lawyers, because they end up having to go to court. Because they can't settle their own problems by themselves. They need the government to interfere and deal with their corporate messes.
Government does so love to interfere.
And they're so wise.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I think its not a matter of socialism versus capitalism.

Interchangeable parts are one of the few things that help to civilize any economic system. They're installing punishment software that punishes you for using a competing repair service. When I buy something I never manifest assent to punishment and assume the right to repair. I expect to own the product unless the product is leased.

I can see where, if one has a warranty, they might want to deal only with some repair services. That is, assuming that the end user doesn't have to pay anything for the repair, if it's still under warranty.

But in the case of these franchise owners, apparently these machines were breaking down constantly, and the time to wait for repair was cutting into their sales. (Apparently, it's a disaster when it happens during Shamrock Season, as that's the time they sell their green Shamrock Shakes.)

The article mentioned that this even led to violence at one McDonald's, where three women attacked a McDonald's employee because the ice cream machine was broken.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
So the impending tax increase is what the
overlords demand, eh. Sorta ruins your theory.

"Tax increase" is just for the sake of political expediency, just to trick the masses into thinking the politicians are on their side. The overlords know that the politicians have to feed so much bunkum to the masses, but they also know that they'll put in so many riders and loopholes that they can find ways around any impending tax increases.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Does the end user have a right to repair something he/she bought from a company?
Technically, probably not. Many agreements forbid tampering and altering the device in any way.
They also have clauses giving them permission to pursue legal action against the user for violating any part of the agreement.
Sony is having a similar thing over the PS5.
Most companies will not sell or otherwise make available the tools, information, and parts for users to do their own repairs.
Electric cars are notorious for having to go to the dealership.
We own fewer of our things (legally so), and have less control over them. I think this system must die.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
20210422_202634.jpg
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I can see where, if one has a warranty, they might want to deal only with some repair services. That is, assuming that the end user doesn't have to pay anything for the repair, if it's still under warranty.

But in the case of these franchise owners, apparently these machines were breaking down constantly, and the time to wait for repair was cutting into their sales. (Apparently, it's a disaster when it happens during Shamrock Season, as that's the time they sell their green Shamrock Shakes.)

The article mentioned that this even led to violence at one McDonald's, where three women attacked a McDonald's employee because the ice cream machine was broken.
Its not just this particular manufacturer. There are Samsung phones and Apple phones which now will disable themselves if you replace the screen or some other parts that otherwise should work. I don't mean copycat parts but say a used part from an identical phone. What happens is the software in the phone checks to make sure it was repaired in an authorized manner and punishes you if it isn't. You are punished for not using their repair services, and many times they refuse to repair things. Batteries are being made with device ID's etc. That is currently legal racketeering.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Technically, probably not. Many agreements forbid tampering and altering the device in any way.
They also have clauses giving them permission to pursue legal action against the user for violating any part of the agreement.
Sony is having a similar thing over the PS5.
Most companies will not sell or otherwise make available the tools, information, and parts for users to do their own repairs.
Electric cars are notorious for having to go to the dealership.
We own fewer of our things (legally so), and have less control over them. I think this system must die.

A lot of electrical items end up in the trash heap because it's just not worth it to spend money on repair. Buying a new device is oftentimes not that much more expensive than repairing an older device.

In most cases, the end user probably wouldn't know how to repair any of these things anyway. Still, you'd think that they would try to make it a little more user friendly, rather than just leave people in the lurch with broken machines.
 
Top