An obsessed gazillionare Democrat ranting over population control.

[Twilight Hue]

https://theweek.com/articles/786940/gazillionaire-democrat-obsessed-population-control?amp#aoh=16437381739023&referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s

Wowwee!!!

Stop breeding folks.

My suggestion is to buy Japanese love androids!

Is this the next level of the nanny state in the making?

 

[sun rise]

The Week clearly hates the left and says so in clear and unambiguous language. The front page ignores Trump inciting violence including seizing voting machines by armed terrorists. This is no surprise.

 

[Kooky]

The Week clearly hates the left and says so in clear and unambiguous language. The front page ignores Trump inciting violence including seizing voting machines by armed terrorists. This is no surprise.

The funny thing is that even they have to admit that he is far from being the only multimillionaire in Congress, and would in fact only the third richest person to work there. What they don't say, of course, is who the other two are, and which political party they're working for.

 

[amorphous_constellation]

Wowwee!!!

Stop breeding folks.

My suggestion is to buy Japanese love androids!

Is this the next level of the nanny state in the making?

I agree a lot with his position, mostly, though I possibly don't see the 'reprimanding' as being useful. It seems like this is more toward something to convince a population of, rather than something to enforce. Though then again, if people are really that rich, maybe they should get a tax on it. And by the way, the right-wing position in not necessary for irresponsible reproduction either. Though they pivot toward the advocacy of total abstinence, which seems harsh.

 

[Revoltingest]

https://theweek.com/articles/786940/gazillionaire-democrat-obsessed-population-control?amp#aoh=16437381739023&referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s

Wowwee!!!

Stop breeding folks.

My suggestion is to buy Japanese love androids!

Is this the next level of the nanny state in the making?

He's not all that wealthy.
More than I have, but not even close to billionaire or even John Kerry status.
Anyway, I favor reducing the human population.
The question of how will be difficult.

And no, I won't be making any Alec Baldwin jokes.

 

[amorphous_constellation]

He's not all that wealthy.
More than I have, but not even close to billionaire or even John Kerry status.
Anyway, I favor reducing the human population.
The question of how will be difficult.

And no, I won't be making any Alec Baldwin jokes.

How about just introduce some actual light regulation to see what happens. I mean, does society want someone driving when driving licenses are optional? Building, without a building permit? Being a doctor without going school etc.?

Granted, there is an aspect of this that grates on me a little, because I do have a problem with introducing too much social credit. But the way I kind of see it, is that this might have an effect on social issues in a different sense, as this is likely a compounding point for many social issues. And it's not a measure that's regulating anything you really 'have' to do.

I don't know, you may at some point 'need' a loan, maybe. But do you need to reproduce, like you need a loan? Reproducing is like the ultimate loan, the ultimate investment. Yet no one can put a form between you doing that, and what you want to do. You'd think there should at least be something. Just the slightest thing even. And there's not even the slightest regulation on it

 

[Twilight Hue]

I agree a lot with his position, mostly, though I possibly don't see the 'reprimanding' as being useful. It seems like this is more toward something to convince a population of, rather than something to enforce. Though then again, if people are really that rich, maybe they should get a tax on it. And by the way, the right-wing position in not necessary for irresponsible reproduction either. Though they pivot toward the advocacy of total abstinence, which seems harsh.

I would just say stop taxing cigarettes and let restaurants start cooking in beef tallow again like the good ole' days for starters.

 

[Revoltingest]

How about just introduce some actual light regulation to see what happens. I mean, does society want someone driving when driving licenses are optional? Building, without a building permit? Being a doctor without going school etc.?

Granted, there is an aspect of this that grates on me a little, because I do have a problem with introducing too much social credit. But the way I kind of see it, is that this might have an affect on social issues in a different sense, as this likely a compounding point for many social issues. And it's not a measure that's regulating anything you really 'have' to do.

I don't know, you may at some point 'need' a loan, maybe. But do you need to reproduce, like you need a loan? Reproducing is like the ultimate loan, the ultimate investment. Yet no one can put a form between you doing that, and what you want to do. You'd think there should at least be something. Just the slightest thing even. And there's not even the slightest regulation on it

I've not given any thought on how to reduce the
population. One thing is clear...if it keeps expanding,
eventually the hard choices will be made.