Frank Graves, the founder of polling and analytics firm EKOS Research, tweeted this out recently. Apparently, it was a slide from a presentation he was doing:
View attachment 61194
Source:
https://twitter.com/VoiceOfFranky/status/1504652043482542080
While I'm not exactly surprised by this, considering what I've seen in online discussions and social media, it's a bit of a jolt to see the correlation spelled out so clearly.
Thoughts?
Ideas about reasons for the correlation?
Hmm. Approximately 6% of the population of Canada is anti-vax, meaning that they won't take the vaccine no matter how much they are pressured or educated on it. The news is overwhelmingly pro-vax, meaning that it strongly advocates all the time that you should be fully vaccinated. The news also overwhelmly reports that Putin is commiting war crimes in Ukraine.
The most obvious conclusion is that approximately 6% of the population in Canada doesn't believe what's reported in the news just because it is overwhelmingly reported.
My opinion of Frank Graves and EKOS Research decreased today. Their MOE of +-3.1% applies if all 1035 are considered together as one group voting yay or nay, but the MOE on the Vaccine Refusers considered as a separate group is likely closer to +-12.4%. Moreover, the question of war crimes is, at best, a misleading question. They were asked if they were anti or pro vax, but weren't asked if they were anti or pro Putin? Instead they were asked about one detail that may or may not influence their opinion of Putin? This would be like asking if vaccine refusers believe that Pfizer is a corrupt company. Regardless of how they responded to the question of corruption in Pfizer, it doesn't necessarily mean they would be pro or anti vax. People don't have to believe that Putin is committing war crimes to be opposed to Putin. These are serious and very basic problems with the poll as presented. Perhaps he has answers to these problems, but then, as the President of EKOS Research, he really ought to have led with that.