मैत्रावरुणिः;3645585 said:
Advaita-m in its most traditional sense, in its original identity, not its watered-down version, is repeatedly theistic. There is no ifs and buts about it. That's just how it is. Putting all the philosophical notions to the side, for they can get quite digressing, Advaita-m is theistic.
...if it wasn't...then you wouldn't have had all these Vedantic scriptures written by these "founding fathers" mentioning a certain Deva as Supreme.
If Advaita-m is not theistic...then it is borderline nihilism. But, I doubt that since the "founding fathers" of Vedanta were rigidly orthodox in their outlooks pertaining to "God". You have to understand...this was at a time when "India" was "atheistic/agnostic" in its religo-spiritual outlooks. Then came a young male by the name of Shankaracharya who took the "atheism/agnosticism" of Bauddha Dharma head on with organized debates in order to establish the "superiority" of theism.
Hehe. Yessir.
Thank you so much, MV.
I have been
trying to say exactly the same thing ever since I arrived here....now, you have said it...Advaita
is Theistic, up until the point of Moksha, when Brahman is actually
realised.
As for Kashmir Shaivism...
I guess that I am one, well, pretty close to it anyway.
My religion is Agama Hindu Dharma and I am a 'Balinese Hindu', but it is very close, and I think that Sage Markandeya came from a similar background...
Apart from being a 'Balinese Hindu', I also study the Vijnana Bhairava Tantra (my main scripture), identify with the Trika School of philosophy, read the works of Swami Lakshmanjoo, worship Lord Bhairava
as God/Brahman and identify with the Pashupati school as well.
I don't know enough about Kashmiri Shaivism to actually be an authority on it, or even give discourse on it. I am still a novice...still learning about it all..I can answer
basic questions about it though.
Om Namah Shivaya