Hmmm....this offends us pedants.Very true, which means there are few socialist countries. Democratic Socialism is not pure Socialism. It's just easier to say Socialism.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hmmm....this offends us pedants.Very true, which means there are few socialist countries. Democratic Socialism is not pure Socialism. It's just easier to say Socialism.
But I’m curious as to your understanding of socialism, Marxism, Stalinism and Leninism?
Like the actual theories themselves?
Fascism isn't seen as a positive, so who would admit to it?
It's still an acquisition of power contrary to the welfare of a free society.Very true, which means there are few socialist countries. Democratic Socialism is not pure Socialism. It's just easier to say Socialism.
"Other people's money", because the "others" want to have free police, free fire department, free schools, free roads, free infrastructure, etc.Every socialist country has their honeymoon phase.
Then the other people's money starts to run out.
Oppresive for big businesses that pollute. Like clean air and water? You won't get any without regulations.Also oppressive laws and regulations are not regarded as safe.
Yes, there are still a few Republicans who aren't fascists.There's plenty of groups out there endorsing forms of facisism, but they are private and independent of the Republican party as far as I'm aware which probably indicates that fascism hasn't yet penetrated American politics.
No it isn't. No democrat is saying the government should buy all businesses.Unlike socialism, which has just as bad a track record that leads to authoritarianism and eventually totalitarianism is now clearly being promoted and endorsed by democrats.
Not your distorted view.Obviously history dosent matter to them of the consequences.
No it isn't. No democrat is saying the government should buy all businesses.
Okay. Good. You clearly know how to Google.Socialism
Socialism can be regarded as "a system of social organization in which private property and the distribution of income are subject to social control."
It's essentially a state-controlled economy in which the state controls the means of production over private firms and businesses.
(We see it manifest with the ev mandate for example.)
Marxism
Marxism is a social, political, and economic philosophy completly based on the teachings of Karl Marx.
It focuses the effect capitalism has over development of productivity, economic development and pushes and argues for revolution in favor of overturning capitalism, and embracing communism.
Stalinism
Essentially a cult of personality around Joseph Stalin. Employing totalitarian means focusing on expanded compulsory industry and command economy through autocratic means.
You could say its communism on steroids through one man.
Leninism
Wiki has the best for this....
Vladimir Lenin that proposes the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat led by a revolutionary vanguard party, as the political prelude to the establishment of communism
The United States has and is steadily dropping down the freedom index at an exponential rate.Okay. Good. You clearly know how to Google.
But I’m asking what you understand about the systems/philosophies specifically. Like what are your main gripes and likes about them?
Indeed no successful country is purely capitalist or socialist.
Since to be a socialist seems to be such an indictment to you, I’m merely curious
I mean I could care less if some political party in my country proclaims itself to be socialist.
Indeed a bigger red flag for me is a politician looking to emulate either of the US political parties. No offence but both your sides look downright draconian to me. I live in the 21st century.
Many countries incorporate socialistic principles as does the US even.
Otherwise neither of us would have roads to drive on, right?
So expand on what you know.
I’m an idiot, but you know more than me
So it should be easy for you
Fair enoughThe United States has and is steadily dropping down the freedom index at an exponential rate.
It at one time the index rating was much higher and pretty much at the top.
Since the 70s , I've lived long enough to see those freedoms erode before my very eyes and since , the Democrats have been more and more controlling and aggressive in their policymaking and the undeniable leftward shift toward socialist leanings. Now they are starting to not even hide it anymore as my op demonstrated by members of the Democrat party themselves threatening socialism, which is all but unrecognizable from the bluedogs from past decades.
This country is eroding and I blame Democrats primarily a large portion of this erosion and to a lesser extent, the Republicans as well.
It's as simple as that.
Most of my commentary and criticism is based on my personal experiences and not completely centered on the academic aspect of how things ought to be defined. All I know is the real time changes and the direction both left and right wing ideologies are taking us.Fair enough
I have a differing view
But I’m not American so I doubt I’d know the ins and outs like you do
What do you mean by “Trojan horse?”Most of my commentary and criticism is based on my personal experiences and not completely centered on the academic aspect of how things ought to be defined. All I know is the real time changes and the direction both left and right wing ideologies are taking us.
I'm not against social programs of and in itself, it's the way they are being implemented that concerns me. There's a diff between social programs and political socialism which the latter being the engine being used to to implement various social programs through compulsory means.
Imv, it essentially tells me its a Trojan horse, where inside seemingly harmless social programs therein, lay the political infrastructure of socialist government being built to intentionally replace democracy altogether.
Compulsory legislation.What do you mean by “Trojan horse?”
We have much more social programs than the US
Have yet to be thrown against the wall by Stalin
You mean like wearing seatbelts, not smoking in the restaurant, and not feeding a double scotch to your child? Oh, the horror! How does America bear such subjugation?!? Why, you're practically slaves!Compulsory legislation.
That's what's inside the Trojan horse.
It isn't harmless social programs they are pitching to people. That carrot on a stick.
It's the implementation of the legal tools needed to control and subjugate the population and industry that is the real goal behind the implementation of social programs. Make things compulsory on one thing, you can make things compulsory on another and then yet another.
What control? Like no dumping of toxins in rivers and streams because children downstream are getting cancer? You oppose this kind of control by "we the people" over big business?Why should they buy business when they can easily control it like they own it themselves.
What media do you use to "inform" what you think is "actual reality"? What you say is not consistent with facts and what we observe. Your views are consistent with far right wing disinformation, which should be embarrassing for you.Distorted? Lol. In your dreams.
I look at the actual reality around me. Not the media fantasy world your privy towards.
Part of me wants to be there when you meet an actual Marxist so I can see your head explode.Sure. Find me a single Republican who openly says they are fascist like Democrat's who openly say their socialists. I'll patiently wait.
I just showed yet another Democrat who openely says they are socialist.
Democrats are now officially a socialist/Marxist political party.
Capitalism here is quite bridled.
To call it "unbridled" bespeaks unfamiliarity with the
real world of business, & reliance upon stereotype.
Regulation here has increased greatly since I started
running businesses.
You could check the growth of the CFR (Code of
Federal Regulations) & IRS regulations. Both have
ballooned over many decades...even during
supposedly anti-reg types like Reagan.
We might agree more than you think. The Scandinavian
model has capitalism & a market economy fueling a useful
social support system. This is not socialism. But it would
achieve your goals (as I understand them) better than
would socialism.
I already did. A Russian visiting the states from the USSR with his personal medals in full view just prior to Gorbachev taking power.Part of me wants to be there when you meet an actual Marxist so I can see your head explode.
Why not? It often seems to be the argument of choice.Can I pick whatever any republican Pollies says, and use it to demonise all Republicans?
Can I pick whatever any Christian says, and use it to demonise all Christians?
Can I pick whatever any atheist says, and use it to demonise all atheists?
What compulsory legislation are you talking about specifically?Compulsory legislation.
That's what's inside the Trojan horse.
It isn't harmless social programs they are pitching to people. That carrot on a stick.
It's the implementation of the legal tools needed to control and subjugate the population and industry that is the real goal behind the implementation of social programs. Make things compulsory on one thing, you can make things compulsory on another and then yet another.