• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Anybody want to deny the Democrat party isn't socialist now?

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
But I’m curious as to your understanding of socialism, Marxism, Stalinism and Leninism?
Like the actual theories themselves?

Socialism

Socialism can be regarded as "a system of social organization in which private property and the distribution of income are subject to social control."


It's essentially a state-controlled economy in which the state controls the means of production over private firms and businesses.

(We see it manifest with the ev mandate for example.)

Marxism


Marxism is a social, political, and economic philosophy completly based on the teachings of Karl Marx.

It focuses the effect capitalism has over development of productivity, economic development and pushes and argues for revolution in favor of overturning capitalism, and embracing communism.


Stalinism

Essentially a cult of personality around Joseph Stalin. Employing totalitarian means focusing on expanded compulsory industry and command economy through autocratic means.

You could say its communism on steroids through one man.


Leninism

Wiki has the best for this....


Vladimir Lenin that proposes the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat led by a revolutionary vanguard party, as the political prelude to the establishment of communism
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Fascism isn't seen as a positive, so who would admit to it?

There's plenty of groups out there endorsing forms of facisism, but they are private and independent of the Republican party as far as I'm aware which probably indicates that fascism hasn't yet penetrated American politics.

Unlike socialism, which has just as bad a track record that leads to authoritarianism and eventually totalitarianism is now clearly being promoted and endorsed by democrats.

Obviously history dosent matter to them of the consequences.
 
Last edited:

F1fan

Veteran Member
Every socialist country has their honeymoon phase.

Then the other people's money starts to run out.
"Other people's money", because the "others" want to have free police, free fire department, free schools, free roads, free infrastructure, etc.

You make it sound as if the Danes live on any money the Finns can get their hands on. No, the greedy Americans don;t want to invest in a society that has so much financial diversity that many can't survive, and for various reasons, like ongoing discrimination, poor education, poverty, lack of resources, lack of opportunity, etc.

Also oppressive laws and regulations are not regarded as safe.
Oppresive for big businesses that pollute. Like clean air and water? You won't get any without regulations.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
There's plenty of groups out there endorsing forms of facisism, but they are private and independent of the Republican party as far as I'm aware which probably indicates that fascism hasn't yet penetrated American politics.
Yes, there are still a few Republicans who aren't fascists.

Unlike socialism, which has just as bad a track record that leads to authoritarianism and eventually totalitarianism is now clearly being promoted and endorsed by democrats.
No it isn't. No democrat is saying the government should buy all businesses.

Obviously history dosent matter to them of the consequences.
Not your distorted view.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
No it isn't. No democrat is saying the government should buy all businesses.

Why should they buy business when they can easily control it like they own it themselves.

Distorted? Lol. In your dreams.

I look at the actual reality around me. Not the media fantasy world your privy towards.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Socialism

Socialism can be regarded as "a system of social organization in which private property and the distribution of income are subject to social control."


It's essentially a state-controlled economy in which the state controls the means of production over private firms and businesses.

(We see it manifest with the ev mandate for example.)

Marxism


Marxism is a social, political, and economic philosophy completly based on the teachings of Karl Marx.

It focuses the effect capitalism has over development of productivity, economic development and pushes and argues for revolution in favor of overturning capitalism, and embracing communism.


Stalinism

Essentially a cult of personality around Joseph Stalin. Employing totalitarian means focusing on expanded compulsory industry and command economy through autocratic means.

You could say its communism on steroids through one man.


Leninism

Wiki has the best for this....


Vladimir Lenin that proposes the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat led by a revolutionary vanguard party, as the political prelude to the establishment of communism
Okay. Good. You clearly know how to Google.;):)
But I’m asking what you understand about the systems/philosophies specifically. Like what are your main gripes and likes about them?
Indeed no successful country is purely capitalist or socialist.
Since to be a socialist seems to be such an indictment to you, I’m merely curious
I mean I could care less if some political party in my country proclaims itself to be socialist.

Indeed a bigger red flag for me is a politician looking to emulate either of the US political parties. No offence but both your sides look downright draconian to me. I live in the 21st century.

Many countries incorporate socialistic principles as does the US even.
Otherwise neither of us would have roads to drive on, right?
So expand on what you know.
I’m an idiot, but you know more than me
So it should be easy for you
 
Last edited:

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Okay. Good. You clearly know how to Google.;):)
But I’m asking what you understand about the systems/philosophies specifically. Like what are your main gripes and likes about them?
Indeed no successful country is purely capitalist or socialist.
Since to be a socialist seems to be such an indictment to you, I’m merely curious
I mean I could care less if some political party in my country proclaims itself to be socialist.

Indeed a bigger red flag for me is a politician looking to emulate either of the US political parties. No offence but both your sides look downright draconian to me. I live in the 21st century.

Many countries incorporate socialistic principles as does the US even.
Otherwise neither of us would have roads to drive on, right?
So expand on what you know.
I’m an idiot, but you know more than me
So it should be easy for you
The United States has and is steadily dropping down the freedom index at an exponential rate.

It at one time the index rating was much higher and pretty much at the top.

Since the 70s , I've lived long enough to see those freedoms erode before my very eyes and since , the Democrats have been more and more controlling and aggressive in their policymaking and the undeniable leftward shift toward socialist leanings. Now they are starting to not even hide it anymore as my op demonstrated by members of the Democrat party themselves threatening socialism, which is all but unrecognizable from the bluedogs from past decades.

This country is eroding and I blame Democrats primarily a large portion of this erosion and to a lesser extent, the Republicans as well. This is because compulsary legislation has taken precedent over elective policymaking which makes for a huge red flag we are heading fast towards authoritarianism.

It's as simple as that.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
The United States has and is steadily dropping down the freedom index at an exponential rate.

It at one time the index rating was much higher and pretty much at the top.

Since the 70s , I've lived long enough to see those freedoms erode before my very eyes and since , the Democrats have been more and more controlling and aggressive in their policymaking and the undeniable leftward shift toward socialist leanings. Now they are starting to not even hide it anymore as my op demonstrated by members of the Democrat party themselves threatening socialism, which is all but unrecognizable from the bluedogs from past decades.

This country is eroding and I blame Democrats primarily a large portion of this erosion and to a lesser extent, the Republicans as well.

It's as simple as that.
Fair enough
I have a differing view
But I’m not American so I doubt I’d know the ins and outs like you do
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Fair enough
I have a differing view
But I’m not American so I doubt I’d know the ins and outs like you do
Most of my commentary and criticism is based on my personal experiences and not completely centered on the academic aspect of how things ought to be defined. All I know is the real time changes and the direction both left and right wing ideologies are taking us.

I'm not against social programs of and in itself, it's the way they are being implemented that concerns me. There's a diff between social programs and political socialism which the latter being the engine being used to to implement various social programs through compulsory means.

Imv, it essentially tells me its a Trojan horse, where inside seemingly harmless social programs therein, lay the political infrastructure of socialist government being built to intentionally replace democracy altogether.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Most of my commentary and criticism is based on my personal experiences and not completely centered on the academic aspect of how things ought to be defined. All I know is the real time changes and the direction both left and right wing ideologies are taking us.

I'm not against social programs of and in itself, it's the way they are being implemented that concerns me. There's a diff between social programs and political socialism which the latter being the engine being used to to implement various social programs through compulsory means.

Imv, it essentially tells me its a Trojan horse, where inside seemingly harmless social programs therein, lay the political infrastructure of socialist government being built to intentionally replace democracy altogether.
What do you mean by “Trojan horse?”
We have much more social programs than the US
Have yet to be thrown against the wall by Stalin ;)
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
What do you mean by “Trojan horse?”
We have much more social programs than the US
Have yet to be thrown against the wall by Stalin ;)
Compulsory legislation.

That's what's inside the Trojan horse.

It isn't harmless social programs they are pitching to people. That carrot on a stick.

It's the implementation of the legal tools needed to control and subjugate the population and industry that is the real goal behind the implementation of social programs. Make things compulsory on one thing, you can make things compulsory on another and then yet another.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Compulsory legislation.

That's what's inside the Trojan horse.

It isn't harmless social programs they are pitching to people. That carrot on a stick.

It's the implementation of the legal tools needed to control and subjugate the population and industry that is the real goal behind the implementation of social programs. Make things compulsory on one thing, you can make things compulsory on another and then yet another.
You mean like wearing seatbelts, not smoking in the restaurant, and not feeding a double scotch to your child? Oh, the horror! How does America bear such subjugation?!? Why, you're practically slaves! :eek:
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Why should they buy business when they can easily control it like they own it themselves.
What control? Like no dumping of toxins in rivers and streams because children downstream are getting cancer? You oppose this kind of control by "we the people" over big business?

Or are democrats going into mom and pop shops wanting to run their businesses? Or running corporations? Of course they are not. You are full of right wing bologna.

Distorted? Lol. In your dreams.

I look at the actual reality around me. Not the media fantasy world your privy towards.
What media do you use to "inform" what you think is "actual reality"? What you say is not consistent with facts and what we observe. Your views are consistent with far right wing disinformation, which should be embarrassing for you.
 
Last edited:

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Sure. Find me a single Republican who openly says they are fascist like Democrat's who openly say their socialists. I'll patiently wait.

I just showed yet another Democrat who openely says they are socialist.

Democrats are now officially a socialist/Marxist political party.
Part of me wants to be there when you meet an actual Marxist so I can see your head explode.
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
Capitalism here is quite bridled.
To call it "unbridled" bespeaks unfamiliarity with the
real world of business, & reliance upon stereotype.
Regulation here has increased greatly since I started
running businesses.
You could check the growth of the CFR (Code of
Federal Regulations) & IRS regulations. Both have
ballooned over many decades...even during
supposedly anti-reg types like Reagan.

When I say "unbridled," I mean that there isn't enough regulation on corporations in particular when it comes to their environmental impact, the taxes the ultra-rich pay, etc. In my opinion, billionaires—or at least multibillionaires like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk—probably shouldn't exist in a reasonable tax system, and corporations definitely shouldn't have as much leeway to carry out environmentally destructive activities for profit as they do now.

We might agree more than you think. The Scandinavian
model has capitalism & a market economy fueling a useful
social support system. This is not socialism. But it would
achieve your goals (as I understand them) better than
would socialism.

The Scandinavian model's relatively high taxes and strong social security are indeed partially inspired by socialism; it's not pure capitalism or pure socialism but a mix of both.

I wouldn't mind full-blown socialism if not for my belief that it would be too idealistic to safely put into practice. Give a state as much power as a bona fide socialist or communist system requires and you will probably end up with a corrupt, brutal dictatorship within a decade at most. Human nature is too flawed for such concentrated power to work well in practice—just as it is too flawed for a truly free, purely capitalist market not to result in monopolies, exploitation, and excessive corporate lobbying.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Can I pick whatever any republican Pollies says, and use it to demonise all Republicans?
Can I pick whatever any Christian says, and use it to demonise all Christians?
Can I pick whatever any atheist says, and use it to demonise all atheists?
Why not? It often seems to be the argument of choice. :rolleyes:
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Compulsory legislation.

That's what's inside the Trojan horse.

It isn't harmless social programs they are pitching to people. That carrot on a stick.

It's the implementation of the legal tools needed to control and subjugate the population and industry that is the real goal behind the implementation of social programs. Make things compulsory on one thing, you can make things compulsory on another and then yet another.
What compulsory legislation are you talking about specifically?

Like speeding laws?
Wearing safety gear around construction sites?
Federal requirements for buildings, roads etc?
Food safety laws?
Dare I say it, vaccine requirements?
 
Top