How do you know those people actually proved those to themselves? Maybe they just believed without looking for proof.
No one has proved any religion to themselves without some form of delusion. Until someone demonstrates proof that's the most likely truth.
Those Bible myths have nothing to do with my God-messenger.
No they do because your "prophet" claims Jesus was an actual real messenger.
Of self-delusions are a common part of the human experience that would apply to more than just religious beliefs.
Yes people delude themselves for many things but religious reasons are the most common ways to delude oneself.
There is nothing in logic that says that the stories to cannot be created by people but also inspired by the Holy Spirit.
First, there is. A "holy spirit" has never been demonstrated. It's a fiction same as a demon. Even worse is now you have to pick and choose which was inspired. You quote John on one thing but assume other things he says are myth. This is not logical at all. Logic says you are believing myths.
That means absolutely nothing and it is a logical fallacy called
the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization and
the Fallacy of Jumping to conclusions to say that just because Scientologists think x and x is not true that of Baha’is believe x, x is not true.
Except it's not hasty because I've been checking out Baha'is scripture for years as well as looked into the prophetic claims. It's definitely created by a man. I cannot understand why people would think an actual God would write ridiculous vague prophecies and odd flowery prose. Or dictate such to a person. Logic that this is a creation that combines several religious concepts to match the religious climate in the region and time is almost certain.
That is your impression but that is biased by the fact that you do not believe that Baha’u’llah was more than a person. I was not impressed by what Baha’u’llah wrote when I first read it either but that was because I did not understand what it meant, so I gave up and read other Baha’i Writings until I learned more about the Faith. Now that I know the divine station of Baha’u’llah, it all makes sense to me why He wrote what He did the way He did.
I do understand what he means and I am sure he is a creative human author.
Can you give me an example of a fictional story in Baha’i scriptures?
First of all "God" is a fiction. The Baha'i scriptures when describing Moses speak as if there really was a Moses and they ventured out of Egypt. Moses is a fictional character and the Israelites came from the Canaanites.
The Baha’i scripture was clearly written by a man who was familiar with the OT.
I agree, those are myths.
But your scripture speaks of Christ as a god-man.
Great please demonstrate how you can show what was inspired by God and who a messenger of God is.
It's really not hard to understand what humans are capable of in a literary sense. We also can easily judge how informed an author is. A God who was dictating text could SO EASILY provide information that demonstrated beyond a doubt this was a supernatural agent.
Baha'i scripture says nothing can be destroyed and that an element always remained. Wow, what a coincidence, we already knew about elements. Not one single bit of unknown science is ever uttered.
Great please demonstrate how you can show what was insThen show whatever was inspired by God could not possibly be simply written by a person with a good idea.
See now you are hiding behind concepts of
falsifiability.
I'm looking for decent evidence, not playing games. I cannot prove words supposedly spoken by Zeus were not but I'm going with not. Until some reasonable evidence is put forth.
I believe was inspired by God could not possibly have been written by a person with a good idea, as that is also a matter of belief.
No, it is not a matter of belief. I will believe gravity because it can be demonstrated. Religion is a matter of emotional manipulation. One wants it to be true and finds a way to accept bad evidence.
The only way to know what is false is to know what is true. I believe that as a Baha’i I have that advantage, so I do not have to wonder if Jesus resurrected or if Jesus is going to return because that is all explained in the Baha’i Writings.
Cool, prove it.
If you believe that you believe that. I am not going to try to talk you out of your beliefs.
Because you cannot. You can only provide evidence. I don't "believe" that I believe what the evidence shows.
My belief in Messengers of God is logical to me, not emotional. It is logical because I understand why God uses Messengers having analyzed the reasons repeatedly.
Sounds like BS. So I'll ask how it's logical to say God requires "messengers" and why are they vastly unimpressive and use endless flowery praise?
If you want to run it all together like that, that is your choice. Too much knowledge can be a veil. Baha’u’llah wrote that and it makes sense, if you understand what He means.
Run what together? The truth? You are doing an awful lot of dancing around here. Too much knowledge? That's a line cults love to use. I do understand what Baha scripture I read. It just sounds like a person with some ideas from different religions?
“Know verily that Knowledge is of two kinds: Divine and Satanic. The one welleth out from the fountain of divine inspiration; the other is but a reflection of vain and obscure thoughts. The source of the former is God Himself; the motive-force of the latter the whisperings of selfish desire. The one is guided by the principle: “Fear ye God; God will teach you;”
29 the other is but a confirmation of the truth:
“Knowledge is the most grievous veil between man and his Creator.” The former bringeth forth the fruit of patience, of longing desire, of true understanding, and love; whilst the latter can yield naught but arrogance, vainglory and conceit.”
The Kitáb-i-Íqán, p. 69
http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/KI/ki-2.html#pg69
Huge red flag. Anytime one investigates the claims of a religion and they start with "oh oh, too much knowledge is Satan" it's wrong on so many levels. See how you frame any knowledge that suggests this is myth as being in the "Satan" category?
What about -
He who arises with steadfastness to serve the cause of God must be a manifestation of wisdom, striving to remove ignorance from amongst human beings. -
So I automatically have to buy it when a guy claims to be speaking for God? Nope. Provide evidence that would warrant belief.
Looks and first impressions can lead one to the fallacy of jumping to conclusions.
I've been asking for evidence and we have somehow moved to "woah, slow down with knowledge and information buddy, that will get you nowhere..."
You are sticking with what you believe is truth and that is your choice, because we all have free will.
I'm sticking with what evidence provides. I do not have a choice to believe in gravity or believe Thor is not a myth.
I wish otherwise but that's just how it is.