Liu
Well-Known Member
That's an interesting explanation, and it makes sense to me on a rational basis.After doing some thinking, it does make sense to me that the Supreme Being is more feminine, at least from human eyes. Sure, the Supreme Being would be genderless and beyond all attributes but I think we need to put a face on it in order to be able to approach Her in a devotional fashion.
Females bring life into the world, females can take life out of it (abortion and miscarriages), females motivate the male sex drive, mammals start off as more female and only take on male characteristics with the introduction of androgens later on, etc. To me, I'm just more comfortable and it makes more sense to me to visualize the Supreme Being as female. Kali is the ultimate representation of the Supreme Being to me.
As for males having to embrace their femininity, it is because the Feminine has been subjugated by males for millennia and a balance needs to be returned. It also has an element of breaking social taboos about gender variance which, imo, need to be broken. For a man to express his feminine side is still seen as a wrong thing in most of the world. This needs to be addressed. As the children of the Goddess and with the Goddess as the Ultimate Reality, we reflect that in ourselves. When I meditate upon Kali, there is a merging. You can't merge with a being without accepting them as yourself.
Still, I can relate to the divine better when I imagine it as either male, or a combination of both (e.g. in the shape of Baphomet, or as a basically genderless dragon). I also call it by the names of e.g. Tiamat, Discordia and Kālī, but I feel much more comfortable with calling it Satan.
I suppose my own feelings of gender dysphoria still hinder me quite a bit at relating to its female aspects.