Well? Why or why not?
They are in mine. My Goddess doesn't give a damn if you're LGBT or not. It's all the same to Her and She is the merging and destruction of all qualities and dualities, anyway. She is male, female, both and neither. For a man to be a Shakta, he must embrace his own feminine aspect in the first place, making male Shaktas somewhat gender variant in a fashion to begin with. (Which is fascinating and brings up interesting questions for me as a female to male transsexual.)
I'm also a Satanist and view Satan as either feminine or androgynous.
I don't " have" a religion, I believe that God's religion is to keep the commandments, etc., and to love others.
The law is written for the originally-intended state of distinct human males and females.
Though I do believe that which is true of evolution and direct creative acts to both be parts of the whole of that which led to human life.... As the creation -of which we are a part -is no longer as originally intended -having been subject to our own actions, time and chance, a lack of maintenance, etc. -is no longer as originally intended, the law must be applied by the willing as it can be according to their situation.
A person who is
truly not of one or the other sex exclusively -by no decision of their own -is simply in a particular state.
If such a person is of a mind to keep the commandments of God, then God would certainly accept them. They would be responsible for truthfully considering their own state and keeping the commandments and judgments under the law as they are able.
Ancient Israel had a system of judges which applied the law to specific situations as they arose -the principle is the same.
Not all gender or sexual issues have to do with a person's state, however, and where a person's will, decisions and actions are contrary to God's will and decisions, they would then be guilty of transgression of the law.