Halcyon said:
Lol. You can't be truly critical of your beliefs, and still call it belief.
Either you think its true or you have your doubts. All of you who have posted saying that you are critical of your beliefs are not, because you still have them.
For example; Aqua, you are critical of Islam because you don't believe Muhammed was a prophet, thus you are not a Muslim. If you were critical of Joseph Smith, you would not be a Mormon.
Rethinking how your personal opinion of a belief fits in with your religion as a whole is not being critical - its just being contemplative.
I one respect, you are correct Halcyon. I won't argue that. However, in another respect your premise does not hold water.
In my little side story, I took the time and literally did almost a performance review of the beliefs I held at that time. It was definitely a highly critical examination of what and why. One thing the story does not outline is the amount of "hidden" Christian beliefs I held (at the time) that were there simply because I grew up in a Christian country, even though I was not raised as a Christian (or anything). Again, the most positive aspect of my little experiment was understanding WHY I believed what I did. It also unhinged several areas that I did not in fact believe in. I only
thought I believed things, because I had never looked at them critically. So, in that sense, you are correct.
Since this time, I have been highly critical of any "up and coming" beliefs.
Terry Woodenpic writes:
Have you done any revisions to your beliefs since.
Not as extensively as this one time, no Terry. I do apply it on a continual basis though. However, I have meant to start this whole process once again... just to see if anything has snuck by my inner security perimeter. For example, when I was a kid, I do not recall writing anything about politics into the belief journal. At 20, I do not think I had preset political belief. Now, I am a bit of a hawk, so it might be time to re-evaluate.