Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You seem to have started again somebody else's thread, making rubbish comments.Deut. 10:19 said:A fable ...
Are you stalking me.Merlin said:You seem to have started again somebody else's thread, making rubbish comments.
The OP did not ask what it represented to the Jehovah's Witness (or, for that matter, to the preterist). It asked: "What do you think Armageddon is?" I answered the question. Feel free to get back to me when you've improved your reading comprehension.Merlin said:Armageddon is not a fable to many people.
Then your response that it is a fable, is even less sensible. Armageddon is a possible future event, so where is your evidence that it is a fable. For all you know, it could be coming - maybe tomorrow.Deut. 10:19 said:Are you stalking me.
The OP did not ask what it represented to the Jehovah's Witness (or, for that matter, to the preterist). It asked: "What do you think Armageddon is?" I answered the question. Feel free to get back to me when you've improved your reading comprehension.
It is a spectacular cataclysmic event enacted by a Supreme Being on bad people to show a group of righteous people that nothing the bad people could have ever done could warrant that kind of punishment.may said:What do you think Armageddon is?
I tend to go with the nuclear holocaust option.may said:What do you think Armageddon is? A nuclear holocaust.....An environmental disaster........A collision of a celestial body with the earth.........or Devine destruction of the wicked?
This is why they should teach critical thinking in schools - though even then there will always be under-achievers.Merlin said:Armageddon is a possible future event, so where is your evidence that it is a fable.
I see that as being one of the 'pit falls' of prophecies; it is so easy to match them up with an event in retrospect.This bible prophecy reference is ambiguous as to whether any event actually takes place here or whether the gathering of armies is only to be seen as a sign. In fact, a gathering of the Roman army occurred at this place as a staging ground for one of their assaults on Jerusalem in AD 67
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.michel said:From:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armageddon
Armageddon refers, generally, to end times or Earth ending catastrophes in various religions and cultures. "Armageddon" also refers to any great loss of life in battle, etc. The word armageddon is derived from Mount (Har in Hebrew) Megiddo, the site of the Battle of Megiddo and other battles.
Interestingly, the only mention in the Bible was in Revelation 16:16: "And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon" (KJV). This bible prophecy reference is ambiguous as to whether any event actually takes place here or whether the gathering of armies is only to be seen as a sign. In fact, a gathering of the Roman army occurred at this place as a staging ground for one of their assaults on Jerusalem in AD 67. This is consistent with the preterist interpretation that the events of Revelation 16:17-21 refer to events culminating in the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.
The rest of the page talks about how different faiths view it.
I see that as being one of the 'pit falls' of prophecies; it is so easy to match them up with an event in retrospect.
I don't believe in God enough as it is to believe he will set forth a Zyclone-B gas upon theI tend to go with the nuclear holocaust option.
angellous_evangellous said:From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Fable
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses of the term, see fable (disambiguation). In its strict sense a fable is a short story or folk tale embodying a moral, which may be expressed explicitly at the end as a maxim. "Fable" comes from Latin fabula and shares a root with faber, "maker, artificer." Thus, though a fable may be conversational in tone, the understanding from the outset is that it is an invention, a fiction. A fable may be set in verse, though it is usually prose. In its pejorative sense, a fable is a deliberately invented or falsified account.
A fable often, but not necessarily, makes metaphorical use of an animal as its central character. Medieval French fabliaux might feature Reynard, the fox, a trickster figure, and offer a subtext that was mildly subversive of the feudal order of society. A familiar theme in Slavic fables is an encounter between a wily peasant and the Devil.
In some usage "fable" has been extended to include stories with mythical or legendary elements. The word fabulous strictly means "pertaining to fables", although in recent decades its metaphorical meanings have been taken to be literal meanings. An author of fables is called a fabulist.
------
Stories of Divine intervention are pretty mythical and/or legendary. Being a myth does not mean that it is useless, or that it has no predictive value or roots in history. It had to have come from somewhere (a person who had a religious experience or simply made it up), and if there is a God, it is not too far fetched to think that He could communicate with humanity.
I don't think that the book of Revelation ends with a maxim, but it does have distinct moral value. The story is without doubt used as a fable by Christians who try to manipulate others to confess Christ out of fear (eg, the "Left Behind" series). I think that Revelation should be used as it was originally intended - to comfort Christians during times of stress and persecution, and not to manipulate others.
I do not doubt that Deut. could have been thinking earlier that the story was deliberately invented or falsified - but even so, if it was invented to comfort people, it loses some of its sting for me, but it is still wrong to completely falsify something.
I am not saying that the Myth is useless; sure it had to come from somewhere. There is a God, it is not too far fetched that he could communicate with humanity (though he has given no evidence of doing so since), but that is purely conjecture.Stories of Divine intervention are pretty mythical and/or legendary. Being a myth does not mean that it is useless, or that it has no predictive value or roots in history. It had to have come from somewhere (a person who had a religious experience or simply made it up), and if there is a God, it is not too far fetched to think that He could communicate with humanity.
Whoever wanted to use the fable to try to manipulate others to confess Christ out of fear don't sound very Christian to me.............I don't think that the book of Revelation ends with a maxim, but it does have distinct moral value. The story is without doubt used as a fable by Christians who try to manipulate others to confess Christ out of fear (eg, the "Left Behind" series). I think that Revelation should be used as it was originally intended - to comfort Christians during times of stress and persecution, and not to manipulate others.
What, you are saying that if it was made up, to comfort people, then it is not falsified ?I do not doubt that Deut. could have been thinking earlier that the story was deliberately invented or falsified - but even so, if it was invented to comfort people, it loses some of its sting for me, but it is still wrong to completely falsify something
Indeed, Armageddon is a place. Its name today is Megiddo.SoyLeche said:It's a valley