• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atennnnn-Shun!

Skwim

Veteran Member
Speaking of Kim Jong Un, Trump said:

"He's the head of the country," Trump said of Kim Friday during a live interview on Fox News' "Fox and Friends." "And I mean he's the strong head. Don't let anyone think anything different."

"He speaks and his people sit up at attention," the President added. "I want my people to do the same."

Trying to cover up his asinine, but revealing, remark,

"Later Friday, Trump told reporters at the White House his remark was a joke."
source
As if having people sitting up at attention when he speaks is funny. Nope, Donny, we got your desperately-wanna-be-dictator message, and it's down right disgusting.

.

 
Last edited:

Shushersbedamned

Well-Known Member
download-1.jpg
(he's just trying to make himself revolting)
 

Cacotopia

Let's go full Trottle
People sit up because if you didn't you would disappear, and likely left to die rot and fester in a dark hole.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
It also praised the North Korean media showing how much it loves absolute dictators and hates free people with unalienable rights.

Donald Trump 'praises North Korean state media and says it is kinder than Fox News'
Trump 'praises North Korean state media and says it's even kinder than Fox News

Regime change starts this November. All who love freedom must vote against the current regime and all its minions. Freedom will win. Truth will win. Honesty will win.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
I don’t know why people like Trump think dictators are strong. It takes much more strength, intelligence and talent to lead a democracy than it does to be a dictator. Kim Jong-un was given his position, he didn’t earn it. And the fact that he needed to kill family members to keep it does not speak well of his leadership skills.
 

Riders

Well-Known Member
I dont stand to attention when The Trump speaks, hes a thousand years old I just do this instead.

 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
I don’t know why people like Trump think dictators are strong. It takes much more strength, intelligence and talent to lead a democracy than it does to be a dictator. Kim Jong-un was given his position, he didn’t earn it. And the fact that he needed to kill family members to keep it does not speak well of his leadership skills.

Excellent post! I think it's in large part a consequence of the often ignored, but quite obvious truth, that the most obvious things are often the most likely thinks to escape people's attention precisely because they are the most obvious. In other words, we too often think truths must appear difficult to see to us.

Beyond that, dictatorships necessarily propagandize their people's with nonsense such as "Under our system, we at last made the trains run on time", These things invariably turn out false under examination, but they are repeated so frequently and so loudly that they spill over into "neighboring" democracies and even become truisms there.

Also most people have little or no supervisor experience but more or less tend to think the military is the gold standard for leadership and organization. I mean, who is not broadly aware of how the military does it? The different major militaries in the world are overall arguably effective at managing things when compared to the challenges they are up against. Yet few people stop to question the obvious : Is a "machine" designed to grind other machines to pieces while being ground to pieces itself a good model for optimally organizing people to achieve goals like revenue growth, cost reduction, productivity gain, etc in a radically different environment than a military environment? For instance, does a civilian organization really need such firmly disciplined "troops" it can even take large numbers of casualties and still function? Or perhaps would a less ridged, less hierarchical, organization be more likely to boost people's moral, allowing them to be more easily inspired to perform their jobs, and consequently lead to gains in productivity?

I ran my business more along the lines of the latter than the former way, and my people measurably outperformed what I could discover of similar organization's performance's, especially in standard measures of productivity.
 
Top