• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheism and Secularism are the future

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
Some atheists & some believers like to say things that others find insulting.
That's just how it goes. If you get used to it, & you needn't move away!

I did not intend any offence, it is simply an honest statement. That faith in god is often immune to the skepticism believers apply in other areas of their life is a pretty straighforward observation.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Then you take offence too easily.

This thread is about atheism and secularism, you must expect atheists to contribute.

You said that people treat believers as gullible morons - I simply disagreed and said that for me (and for many other atheists) I do not see believers as gullible morons, but as having a blind spot to one particular part of their worldview that is immune to logic and skepticism.

That is no insult, how else do you imagine that non-believers can interpret faith?

You are calling our beliefs illogical and basically saying that we don't question them. On what planet is that not an insult? Not believing in something and demeaning those who do does not necessarily go hand in hand.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
And believers have their opinions about atheists which could be seen as offensive:
- We're spiritually blind.
- We hate God.
- We're rebelling against a particular religion.
- It's the latest fashion.

I've been around a while. I can't take offense at such opinions.
They reflect on the one opining, not upon me.

Absolutely, I am told such things constantly - and worse, such as that I am going to be tortured for an eternity.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
You are calling our beliefs illogical and basically saying that we don't question them.

Correct. If they were logical, there would be no atheists.
On what planet is that not an insult?

Well here, on a debate forum specifically created so that believers and non-believers can discuss such things. If a person finds any views contrary to their own to be insulting, they should steer clear of debating them.
Not believing in something and demeaning those who do does not necessarily go hand in hand.

Sure, but being on a debate forum and getting offended at what atheists think doesn't go hand in hand either.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Correct. If they were logical, there would be no atheists.

Well here, on a debate forum specifically created so that believers and non-believers can discuss such things. If a person finds any views contrary to their own to be insulting, they should steer clear of debating them.

Sure, but being on a debate forum and getting offended at what atheists think doesn't go hand in hand either.

No, I get offended when people say rude things. You said something rude and ignorant.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I did not intend any offence, it is simply an honest statement. That faith in god is often immune to the skepticism believers apply in other areas of their life is a pretty straighforward observation.
I understand. I notice that believers & atheists typically have fundamentally different perspectives.
Some generalities (which certainly do not apply to everyone):
- Believers tend to see things as having a clear & singular cause.
- Atheists are more comfortable seeing complex processes (eg, stochastic) with complex results (ie, emergent properties).
- Believers are more prone to magical thought.
- Atheists are less trusting of authority.
- Believers have a greater need for meaning/purpose in life.
- Believers have a greater need for absolutes, ie, things to be "true".
 
Last edited:

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
I understand. I notice that believers & atheists typically have fundamentally different perspectives.
Some generalities (which certainly do not apply to everyone):
- Believers tend to see things as having a clear & singular cause.
- Atheists are more comfortable seeing complex processes (eg, stochastic) with complex results (ie, emergent properties).
- Believers are more prone to magical thought.
- Atheists are less trusting of authority.
- Believers have a greater need for meaning/purpose in life.
- Believers have a greater need for absolutes, ie, things to be "true".

Thanks.

IfI could add to that - Atheists seem more comfortable to accept that they do not know some things, whilst believers tend to need an explanation.
 

Sapiens

Polymathematician
I understand. I notice that believers & atheists typically have fundamentally different perspectives.
Some generalities (which certainly do not apply to everyone):
- Believers tend to see things as having a clear & singular cause.
- Atheists are more comfortable seeing complex processes (eg, stochastic) with complex results (ie, emergent properties).
- Believers are more prone to magical thought.
- Atheists are less trusting of authority.
- Believers have a greater need for meaning/purpose in life.
- Believers have a greater need for absolutes, ie, things to be "true".
Brain function has also been shown to be different, believers are amygdala (fear based) driven, atheists are frontal lobe (logic based) driven.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
Brain function has also been shown to be different, believers are amygdala (fear based) driven, atheists are frontal lobe (logic based) driven.

I would like to see that study, because that frankly sounds very shady. I'm quite logical, thank you very much. Logic is very important to me.

Besides, for most of the Catholic Church's life, they were incredibly logically-minded and driven.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
^That is the sort of the insulting crap I'm talking about. If the future belongs to people who parrot nonsense like that, I'm going to live on a deserted island away from it all.
You've been using the insult "nonsense" a lot lately towards us heathens.
Glass house & stone throwing thingie.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Thanks.

IfI could add to that - Atheists seem more comfortable to accept that they do not know some things, whilst believers tend to need an explanation.
As I've heard said, the more I learn, the less I know.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
I did not intend any offence, it is simply an honest statement.

However honest, the words were not well chosen. Saying that we have a blind spot that's "immune to logic and skepticism" carries with it the implication that we're stupid.

What we intended to communicate isn't necessarily what we actually communicated. Monty Python did a great skit about that once.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
I would like to see that study, because that frankly sounds very shady. I'm quite logical, thank you very much. Logic is very important to me.

Besides, for most of the Catholic Church's life, they were incredibly logically-minded and driven.

It's a pile of crap, basically. Logic is very important to me, as well. Nor do I think I know everything and will be the first to admit that humanity's knowledge is severely limited. Basically, everything some of the atheists in this thread are saying about religious people is a just a bunch of negative stereotypes that they're using to bash us with.
 
Top