Atheism or No Intelligence Allowed

[questfortruth]

Dr. Richard Dawkins in a religious movie [Expelled: No Intelligence
Allowed] said something like this: ``I am atheist because there is no
proof that God exists." I believe it is incomplete, so, let me try to read
between the lines: ``I am atheist because there is no [globally accepted]
proof that God exists and I want to be atheist." Many respectful and valid
theists say: ``I am the theist because I want so, however, there is no
scientific proof for God yet." Richard would demonstrate an un-emotional
reason to be an atheist if he would say: ``I am atheist because there
is [non-debunked] proof that God does not exist."

 

[Spirit of Light]

Dr. Richard Dawkins in "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" said: "I am atheist because there is no proof that God exists."

It is not logical. He would demonstrate a reason to be an atheist if he would say:

"I am atheist because there is proof that God does not exist."

Maybe he has not found any proof that he him self can accept as a proof of Gods existance?
Can God be proven 100% by use of scientific ways of proof?

 

[questfortruth]

Maybe he has not found any proof that he him self can accept as a proof of Gods existance?
Can God be proven 100% by use of scientific ways of proof?

Here is it:

 

[ChristineM]

Dr. Richard Dawkins in "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" said: "I am atheist because there is no proof that God exists."

It is not logical. He would demonstrate a reason to be an atheist if he would say:

"I am atheist, because there is proof that God does not exist."

Dawkins, by his own words is not atheist
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...doesnt-exist/2012/02/24/gIQA7496XR_story.html


However he is correct in saying that "there is no proof that god exists". If you think that statement is incorrect then please provide evidence

 

[Left Coast]

PSA, for the 293649363837474th time:

What's the Difference Between Strong and Weak Atheism?

 

[Spirit of Light]

Here is it:

I know that paper is written by your self Do you have other scientists who used their findings to prove God by science?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

It is not logical. He would demonstrate a reason to be an atheist if he would say:

"I am atheist because there is proof that God does not exist."

You can't prove a negative.
Such as, you cannot disprove the murderous shadow stalker in your room, watching your every move, waiting until you are at your most comfortable and secure before killing you. You cannot prove that is bullocks and doesn't exist.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Dawkins, by his own words is not atheist
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...doesnt-exist/2012/02/24/gIQA7496XR_story.html


However he is correct in saying that "there is no proof that god exists". If you think that statement is incorrect then please provide evidence

No posting Dawkins saying he's not entirely sure god doesn't exist! You'll banish RF into the void and break the internet.

 

[questfortruth]

PSA, for the 293649363837474th time:

What's the Difference Between Strong and Weak Atheism?

Proof of Theism:
1. atheism can be strong or weak. Thus, if the strong atheistic position would be proven illogical, then the weak atheism is illogical too.
2. Strong Atheism is not logical.
3. Thus, theism is proven.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Proof of Theism:
1. atheism can be strong or weak. Thus, if the strong atheistic position would be proven illogical, then the weak atheism is illogical too.
2. Strong Atheism is not logical.
3. Thus, theism is proven.

As you maybe know. I am not a strong believer in science or in atheism. But can i prove anyone of them being wrong in one way or the other? Nope i can not.
If Atheists are correct. there is no God to be disproven or proven by science How would they prove something is not there, or how can science prove something is scientific proven if God is not possible to find or meassure

How can a believer use science to prove something that can not be proven, except for their own belief and faith in it That is why i say by using scientific tools God can not be proven (at this point in time, it might happen in the future)

 

[ChristineM]

Proof of Theism:
1. atheism can be strong or weak. Thus, if the strong atheistic position would be proven illogical, then the weak atheism is illogical too.
2. Strong Atheism is not logical.
3. Thus, theism is proven.

Atheism : disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

That should be proof enough for anyone

 

[PureX]

What's the Difference Between Strong and Weak Atheism?

Honesty.

 

[George-ananda]

The word 'proof' does not apply to these types of subjects. Is there an accepted instrument that can measure for a God or anything even paranormal? No.

The right question is; what is most reasonable to believe all things considered.

 

[questfortruth]

Atheism : disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

That should be proof enough for anyone

When an atheist says: "I am atheist because there is no proof that God exists", he says a lie.
Correct?

The same illogical level: "I am atheist because the sky is blue."

 

[sun rise]

Proof of Theism:
1. atheism can be strong or weak. Thus, if the strong atheistic position would be proven illogical, then the weak atheism is illogical too.
2. Strong Atheism is not logical.
3. Thus, theism is proven.

The level of illogic in that leads me to this:

1. You may or may not be a human. Thus, if you are not a human, what you post has no meaning and is illogical too..
2. You are human and thus not logical.
3. You don't exist.

 

[sun rise]

When an atheist says: "I am atheist because there is no proof that God exists", he says a lie.
Correct?

No

 

[questfortruth]

No

When an atheist says: "I am atheist because there is no proof that God exists", he says a lie.
The same illogical level: "I am atheist because the sky is blue."

 

[Spirit of Light]

When an atheist says: "I am atheist because there is no proof that God exists", he says a lie.
Correct?

The same illogical level: "I am atheist because the sky is blue."

It is the Atheists belief because of lack of scientific proof of God that lead them to say it. And it is also why they say to believers. Your belief can not be true because you can not prove it by science that God exists. So where does it lead us by telling each other that they are lying?

 

[icehorse]

Proof of Theism:
1. atheism can be strong or weak. Thus, if the strong atheistic position would be proven illogical, then the weak atheism is illogical too.
2. Strong Atheism is not logical.
3. Thus, theism is proven.

With all due respect. I admire your passion and persistence, but you really ought to find a good book on formal logic and critical thinking.

 

[ChristineM]

When an atheist says: "I am atheist because there is no proof that God exists", he says a lie.
Correct?

The same illogical level: "I am atheist because the sky is blue."

Incorrect. If there were proof then your faith would have no need to exist. You have faith therefore there is no proof

The sky is observed to appear blue. Do you have such observation of god? If not your statement is illogical