Atheists believe in miracles more than believers

[TagliatelliMonster]

No. Not that I have seen. If they want to believe in the theory of evolution, even though bacteria remain as bacteria, fish remain as fish, gorillas remain as gorillas, that's what they think. Oh, and birds remain as birds.

Ow look, again with that silly non-argument that's been corrected a bazillion times....

Here is a post from 2021 where you made the same mistake and where I am correcting you:

More News on the Changing Evolution Scene :-) !!! :-)

I like bananas, too. One thing in favor of gorillas -- as I understand it, they are not big meat eaters. So they don't raise cattle which is apparently adding to ruin the earth. (Oh, well. The Bible says God will ruin those who ruin the earth -- that's in Revelation, but of course, you probably...

www.religiousforums.com

And many more times after that.
3 years worth of repeating the same mistake over and over and over again, and having it corrected every time by me and others.

You will never learn, will you?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Why, because you say so?

Because your human anatomy and DNA says so.

You are an ape for the same reason that you are a mammal.
Do you also deny being a mammal?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I don't see how can be funny playing with someone who ignores you

Replying to his posts doesn't exactly qualify as "ignoring".

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

It's ridiculous.

35 comments about how the ignore list works...

I guess they got tired of having to explain to creationists how evolution works.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Don't waste your time on that, my friend. It seems that they don't even realize "their silly selves" because they are uncapable of doing that, machines can't do that.

I opened this topic to show them, to atheists, that they believe more in miracles than believers themselves. That is easy to prove: they believe life came out of inorganic material just because some law appear just because out of somewhere just because ...

We, believers, don't think on "just because" origins. We believe in a ver powerful and wise Supreme Being who share life with his creatures. Life came form life.

Who believe in miracles? Believers? Nah; atheists do.

You might want to review the definition of "miracle".

Natural processes (what you are ascribing to non-believers, even if it is in the form of a strawman) are not "miracles".
Supernatural processes (what you are professing belief in), are.

Silly self-contradiction right there...

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I don't care what they have to say...

It doesn't look like you don't....
Your constant raving suggests the opposite.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

What do you think on the issue I opened this topic for?

I think it's fundamentally dishonest because it is obvious that it was never your intention to actually have an honest discussion about that topic.

 

[Димитар]

So you say it basically means Christ is risen.

Yes

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

You still don't realize that there are very few real people responding to the dialogues?

Accusing a staff member of being a bot. Priceless.

This place, as well as others on the internet, are just bot farms, where they are made to respond according to what they are programmed to do.

If that is truly what you believe, then why are you wasting your time responding to bots?

Could it perhaps be that you don't really believe that and instead you are just trolling and / or trying to be insulting?

There is hardly anyone here who is really interested in any of the topics discussed. It's just a show.

I think the person the least interested in actually discussing the OP, is that author of the OP.
I present all his posts in this thread as evidence.

Any real person who visits these places already has to be aware of that reality: he is going to be the test subject for the machines they are programming... very badly, by the way.

Does that include you?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I'll answer you if you tell me what is the secret on being a "Staff Member" ... so I can put you on ignore with the rest of people I don't mind what they say.

Now trying to insult a staff member through passive aggressive trolling.
Even more priceless!

 

[Dan From Smithville]

What do you think on the issue I opened this topic for?

I think that you seem to be the person least interested in the topic with no apparent desire to actually discuss it. You seem to be more interested in other things unrelated to the topic.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Man, you do keep twisting. Men and women are not monkeys and monkeys are not men or women.

No, there was not one iota of twisting there. Reread it. If you can't understand politely ask questions.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Monkeys are male or female but that does not mean they are human.

You finally got one right!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Monkeys are monkeys and not chimpanzees.

Ooh. Back to fail mode. This is what you said:

"Dogs are dogs and not poodles."

 

[It Aint Necessarily So]

So far it seems that monkeys remain monkeys

Some monkeys have already become apes. You and I, who are apes, have monkey ancestors.

Also, your comment was unrelated to the one you quoted, which was, "The science of genetics is the basis for one of the planks of the theory, namely, the existence of heritability and genetic variation. The other is natural selection."

The theory is correct beyond reasonable doubt. It's that which you'd rather believe that has been successfully refuted. Creationism enjoys the same status as flat-earthism and for the same reason: the revelations of scientific inquiry. For whatever reason, a pesky contingent of believers in each continues to exist but are marginalized.

 

[Димитар]

@YoursTrue

Are humans still evolving?

For much of nature, natural selection and ‘survival of the fittest’ still play a dominant role; only the strongest can survive in the wild. As little as a few hundred years ago, the same was true for humans.

www.yourgenome.org

At certain point in time i belive that we will not be the same as today.

DNA is by far the most complex language that is not human.

If you stretched the DNA in one cell all the way out, it would be about 2m long and all the DNA in all your cells put together would be about twice the diameter of the Solar System.

 

[paarsurrey]

Most of these are not laws, they are ideas. What i meant is the laws of thermodynamics and other laws of science.
See ...
Scientific law - Wikipedia
for an explanation.

Earlier one was talking about the Universal Laws, now one has left that idea, right, please?

Regards

 

[F1fan]

That is what reality shows. Humans remain as humans, finches remain as finches, and gorillas remain as gorillas.

Only if you look at species on a short timeline. On a longer timeline species can, and do, evolve into new species. Sometimes it is a branch, but other times, like with homo erectus evoling into homo sapiens, the old species no longer exists.

 

[F1fan]

And many more times after that.
3 years worth of repeating the same mistake over and over and over again, and having it corrected every time by me and others.

You will never learn, will you?

The negative inffluence of toxic religious belief is quite interesting. But also tragic.

 

[ChristineM]

Earlier one was talking about the Universal Laws, now one has left that idea, right, please?

Regards

Nope, we are taking different definitions. When i say universal laws i mean laws that govern the universe. I'm not sure what your definition of university is