I was explaining that heterosexual adultery plays a significant role in the US, whenever it deals with undermining the political opponent. I have seen it during the Lewinski case.
That is not something the press would care about, here.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Baby Biden
- Thread starter Shaul
- Start date
-
- Tags
- biden hunter biden
That is not something the press would care about, here.
You believe a father saying he is proud of his son means that the father "is very much coupled with the son's financial and political dealings."
No. That is clearly nonsense. And I don't think even you believe that.
Do you want to try again?
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
What a bizarre way of putting it because your implication above is that he's already guilty.
And yet you frequently call some here "Trump haters", and then you deny that you do the same with Biden that I simply cannot believe because I've never seen a post of your praise or defend Biden for anything, and I've read a lot of your posts. If you have, post it and I'll apologize.
No need to. A father that maintains he is proud of a son who is a crack addict, alcoholic, crook that fathers illegitimate children with stripper is a father whose judgment is impaired. Such is Joe Biden. So long as Joe Biden tries to give shade and cover for Hunter's peccadilloes he has wedded himself to them too.
You think that would hold up in a court of law?
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
And where exactly did you get this information from, especially what was he convicted on and how you know his children are illegitimate? Also, how have you concluded that his father has impaired judgement as opposed to his occasional foot-in-the-mouth slipups? Frankly, he seems far less impaired than you in this area.
You think it is a court of law where this will be determined instead of the court of public opinion?
Do you always answer questions with questions?
You know this would not hold up in a court of law because no reasonable juror or judge would conclude that just because Joe said he was proud of his son that proves "he is very much coupled with Hunter's financial and political dealings." It is nonsense.
No reasonable judge, no juror would accept this, and no lawyer would even present such absurd reasoning.
And no reasonable person in the "court of public opinion" would accept it either.
Come on Saul. It is obvious what happened here. I questioned you about something you didn't expect to be questioned about and you were not prepared to defend it. You gave a response without thinking it through.
They are matters of public record and Hunter Biden has admitted to those things.
Hunter Biden: The struggles and scandals of the US president's son
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Yes, I agree, but I was mostly referring to him as supposedly being legally guilty.They are matters of public record and Hunter Biden has admitted to those things.
Hunter Biden: The struggles and scandals of the US president's son
You are being so utterly hypocritical to assume he legal guilt while pooh-poohing away Trump's and Bibi's legal woes, so maybe consider stop playing your childish little games, OK?
Not always. Do you?
You are trying to conflate two things. The case against Hunter Biden, which is a legal one, and the case against Joe Biden, which is a political one. I have been quite clear that the current case against Joe Biden is political in nature and will not be one for legal courts but the court of public opinion. So what is absurd is your continuing to ask whether I think it would go to a court of law. You are the one being absurd.
According to the Washington Post Federal Prosecutors have enough evidence to indict Hunter Biden.
Prosecutors weighing charges in Hunter Biden investigation
I have been quite clear that the case against Joe Biden is not currently a legal one. You have no point.Yes, I agree, but I was mostly referring to him as supposedly being legally guilty.
You are being so utterly hypocritical to assume he legal guilt while pooh-poohing away Trump's and Bibi's legal woes, so maybe consider stop playing your childish little games, OK?
No, what you said was “President Biden is very much coupled with Hunter Biden's financial and political dealings.”
You believe, and expect others to believe, that because Joe once said the was proud of his some that makes him “very much coupled with Hunters financial and political dealings”. That is absurd.
Show me any evidence that Joe is financially coupled with Hunter.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
And you have no honesty as you nit-pick the Biden's and the "liberals" but then chafe when anyone even mentions anything negative about Trump or Bibi. How can you so utterly biased and expect us to ignore that this is your m.o.? I don't think you're not fooling anyone, Shaul.
Yes, you have.
Who’s Bibi?
(Sorry not an American)
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Netanyahu, who's Israel's prime minister.