JustCallMeNick
Member
Are there innate differences between men and women? If so, what are they?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That is a trick question. There are statistical differences but these should not be generalized to individual cases.Are there innate differences between men and women? If so, what are they?
Are there innate differences between men and women? If so, what are they?
Women smell like fish, & men smell like bicycles?Something to do with fish and bicycles?
Are there any genuinely "innate" psychological or behavioral differences? What do you make of the neuroscience showing how men's and women's brains function differently or respond to stimuli differently?Lots of overlap. Lots and lots and lots of overlap due to the similarities as a species. But innate differences tend to pool around: Average height, center of gravity, pelvic floor width ratio, location of most muscular density and bulk, and hormonal fluctuations offer a few differences in structural variances. Behavioral differences are most supported by cultural norms.
Are there any genuinely "innate" psychological or behavioral differences? What do you make of the neuroscience showing how men's and women's brains function differently or respond to stimuli differently?
Evidence?Behavioral differences are most supported by cultural norms.
Are there innate differences between men and women? If so, what are they?
Evidence?
I tend to view these subjects like this through a biological and physical anthropology view. There's a huge wealth of biological studies showing the physiological differences between males and females in every system of the body. Generally speaking, males tend to be one way or more inclined towards certain behaviors and the same for females. Arguing that it's socially constructed presents a chicken and the egg argument and ignores the findings of the hard sciences. I view culture as more of an interplay between biology and environmental circumstances. I actually don't even like the term "gender" because it's so abstract that it's almost meaningless these days.Google scholar provides plenty of evidence in searching their sociological studies of gender norms, though an overview at the gender and genetics health ethics page at WHO is pretty good and cites their studies toward the end. Basically the various biological sexes and gender expressions recognized by health industries and cultures around the world show that this isn't a simplistic Estrogen=Barefoot Kitchen Mom and Testosterone=Dominating Strong Man. Environmental factors, economic systems, availability of resources, local prevailing customs, all pool together to help create the various gender expectations that change as resources and governments and technologies change. Biological structures and hormonal fluctuations also change as people age and pass through life stages, so sex and gender remains fluid across a spectrum, rather than a static and dualistic Male/Female dichotomy.
And because cultures are so varied around the world, and gender expressions vary so much, it's a strong correlation.
To build upon what Dee Dee is saying, what battle? Even the battle of the sexes is socially constructed. Just like marriage. Just like education systems. Just like prevailing religious trends. Gender norms aren't immune to the power of cultural influence.
Of course, this falls back on the nature vs nurture debate, which I don't see as a debate. It's a dance between what our bodies are processing and how we cope with environmental stimuli all around us. What is expressed however, IMO, is largely influenced by cultural factors.
I tend to view these subjects like this through a biological and physical anthropology view. There's a huge wealth of biological studies showing the physiological differences between males and females in every system of the body. Generally speaking, males tend to be one way or more inclined towards certain behaviors and the same for females. Arguing that it's socially constructed presents a chicken and the egg argument and ignores the findings of the hard sciences. I view culture as more of an interplay between biology and environmental circumstances. I actually don't even like the term "gender" because it's so abstract that it's almost meaningless these days.
I was trying to be catchy.Just curious, why did you title your thread as 'battle of the sexes' ...what's the 'battle' if we're just speaking of differences?
I was trying to be catchy.
Male dominant? In the past in most cultures perhaps. But here and now?For some reason I noticed that the majority of mothers are much more lenient than fathers. That's why I'd, if the situation presents it self, fight my father back for the sake of my mother.
Battle of sexes? I'm afraid the world and nature for humans are both male dominant already
Male dominant? In the past in most cultures perhaps. But here and now?
Male dominant? In the past in most cultures perhaps. But here and now?