The Kilted Heathen
Crow FreyjasmaðR
Gotcha, thanks. I was about to say, an 8 day fetus is... literally cells lolno sorry
8 days after delivery, then the baby is named at the circumcision.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Gotcha, thanks. I was about to say, an 8 day fetus is... literally cells lolno sorry
8 days after delivery, then the baby is named at the circumcision.
Yes Exodus 21:22-25I vaguely recall a friend telling me about a Bible
passage regarding how to punish someone for
causing a pregnant woman's miscarriage.
Anyone know it?
Well, supply the quote, bub!Yes Exodus 21:22-25
"So *before* someone was in the womb, he was known. In other words, he was known even before conception."
It takes about 6-12 days for a fertilized egg to travel to the uterus and attach to the uterus.
So maybe its saying he knew them once the egg was fertilized, before it reaches the uterus(womb).
It certainly does. Are you trying to say God knew him before conception then forgot and he became a nothing until birth?
That a human is valuable at every stage.
Proof that the fetus was a baby is what I think.
Are we talking the pre Rowe v Wade translation or the Post Rowe v Wade translation?Yes Exodus 21:22-25
Also that appears to have been the exception rather than the rule. From the context it looks as if it is explaining why this person was so special.No I am saying that God 'knew' him before he even existed--as in knew everything about what this individual would be.
Well, supply the quote, bub!
Here's what Judaica Press has:Are we talking the pre Rowe v Wade translation or the Post Rowe v Wade translation?
So a miscarriage causes no fatality, eh.22 And should men quarrel and hit a pregnant woman, and she miscarries but there is no fatality, he shall surely be punished, when the woman's husband makes demands of him, and he shall give [restitution] according to the judges' [orders].
And I agree with that. You might not be aware of this but in the US most Bibles changed their translation sometime after Roe v Wade so that they could claim that the Bible argues against abortion where it merely seems neutral if the death of a fetus or embryo is only a fine.Here's what Judaica Press has:
22 And should men quarrel and hit a pregnant woman, and she miscarries but there is no fatality, he shall surely be punished, when the woman's husband makes demands of him, and he shall give [restitution] according to the judges' [orders].
23 But if there is a fatality, you shall give a life for a life,
24 an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, a foot for a foot,
25 a burn for a burn, a wound for a wound, a bruise for a bruise.
As I just said, in the US that would be the case only if you had an older Bible.So a miscarriage causes no fatality, eh.
I vaguely recall a friend telling me about a Bible
passage regarding how to punish someone for
causing a pregnant woman's miscarriage.
Anyone know it?
In that case it would always be life for life.So a miscarriage causes no fatality, eh.
It is a mangled translation. Those appeared after Roe v Wade. Before that the translations used to be "miscarriage" instead of "premature birth".I take this as the baby was born early but survived, so its a fine. If it dies then its a life for a life
Exodus 21:22
New International Version
“If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows.
New Living Translation
“Now suppose two men are fighting, and in the process they accidentally strike a pregnant woman so she gives birth prematurely. If no further injury results, the man who struck the woman must pay the amount of compensation the woman’s husband demands and the judges approve.
English Standard Version
“When men strive together and hit a pregnant woman, so that her children come out, but there is no harm, the one who hit her shall surely be fined, as the woman’s husband shall impose on him, and he shall pay as the judges determine.
Berean Standard Bible
If men who are fighting strike a pregnant woman and her child is born prematurely, but there is no further injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman’s husband demands and as the court allows.
King James Bible
If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
New King James Version
“If men fight, and hurt a woman with child, so that she gives birth prematurely, yet no harm follows, he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman’s husband imposes on him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
New American Standard Bible
“Now if people struggle with each other and strike a pregnant woman so that she gives birth prematurely, but there is no injury, the guilty person shall certainly be fined as the woman’s husband may demand of him, and he shall pay as the judges decide.
Exodus 21:23
New International Version
But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life,
New Living Translation
But if there is further injury, the punishment must match the injury: a life for a life,
English Standard Version
But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life,
Berean Standard Bible
But if a serious injury results, then you must require a life for a life—
King James Bible
And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
New King James Version
But if any harm follows, then you shall give life for life,
New American Standard Bible
But if there is any further injury, then you shall appoint as a penalty life for life,
Exodus 21:22 If men who are fighting strike a pregnant woman and her child is born prematurely, but there is no further injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman's husband demands and as the court allows.
I hadn't thought of that first clause in that light before.So *before* someone was in the womb, he was known. In other words, he was known even before conception.
That doesn't say much about the status of a fetus as a baby.
I don't know about that, but what if didn't happen that way?Sort of a special case, don't you think?