questfortruth
Well-Known Member
These are the most straightforward proofs of many research tasks.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12946.73923
Let me demonstrate a humble way how to work for the Research Progress more
efficiently, keeping in mind for myself that ``You were steeped in sin at
birth; how dare you lecture!'' John 9:34.
It is Nihilism to reply ``there are no proofs'' without reporting mistakes. Such
crazy trolling and bullying were already 2000 years ago:
``If I said something wrong, show what is wrong. But if I spoke the
truth, why did you strike Me?'' John 18:23.
F. Nietzsche defines Nihilism as rejecting an obvious truth, like 2+2=4.
It is natural for ordinary persons to feel distrust and rejection against an
unfamiliar, low score, unpublished author because the true information must
come from a trustful source. Described condition for the validity of information
was seen already in the first century: ``Nazareth! Can anything good come
from there?'' John 1:46. But this self-protection instinct is abnormal for
scientific journals; they are the Enterprises of Truth Making with the
duty to deal fairly with such unacknowledged, ``dirty'', unknown authors.
Hollywood is the star-making factory, and the journal is the Truth
making factory.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12946.73923
Let me demonstrate a humble way how to work for the Research Progress more
efficiently, keeping in mind for myself that ``You were steeped in sin at
birth; how dare you lecture!'' John 9:34.
It is Nihilism to reply ``there are no proofs'' without reporting mistakes. Such
crazy trolling and bullying were already 2000 years ago:
``If I said something wrong, show what is wrong. But if I spoke the
truth, why did you strike Me?'' John 18:23.
F. Nietzsche defines Nihilism as rejecting an obvious truth, like 2+2=4.
It is natural for ordinary persons to feel distrust and rejection against an
unfamiliar, low score, unpublished author because the true information must
come from a trustful source. Described condition for the validity of information
was seen already in the first century: ``Nazareth! Can anything good come
from there?'' John 1:46. But this self-protection instinct is abnormal for
scientific journals; they are the Enterprises of Truth Making with the
duty to deal fairly with such unacknowledged, ``dirty'', unknown authors.
Hollywood is the star-making factory, and the journal is the Truth
making factory.