I disagree, but that is a different discussion.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Biden tanking
- Thread starter Jayhawker Soule
- Start date
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
We need to remember that polls are only a snapshot in time and that a lot can happen in a year. I don't know what will happen November of next year, but I do know that I may ask you afterword where I can find a room for my wife and I in Toronto-- or at least Windsor.
I live in Chicagoland, but I'll help if I can.We need to remember that polls are only a snapshot in time and that a lot can happen in a year. I don't know what will happen November of next year, but I do know that I may ask you afterword where I can find a room for my wife and I in Toronto-- or at least Windsor.
Colt
Well-Known Member
Joe Biden has a long record of making racist comments! He chose Kamilla for race and gender! There is no question about why! On the Left it's all about how things look and feel, not weather someone can lead! But I would say Obama was well qualified and was a good leader for the (D)'s. Although he left the DNC underfunded which lead to the Clintons take over and failed candidacy because frankly, lots of (D)'s dent like that woman!Um, Ok. Guess I was just imaging all that, eh?
Biden picks Kamala Harris as running mate, first Black woman
WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) — Joe Biden named California Sen. Kamala Harris as his running mate on Tuesday, making history by selecting the first Black woman to compete on a major party’s presidential ticket and acknowledging the vital role Black voters will play in his bid to defeat President Donald Trumapnews.com
Black Leaders Want a Black Woman as Biden’s Running Mate. But Who? (Published 2020)
Among black leaders close to Joe Biden, a commitment to selecting a woman is not enough. They have publicly and privately pushed him to select a black woman to fuel black voter enthusiasm.www.nytimes.com
YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
Hearing Kamala say the other day that she was prepared to step up and be President sent an actual chill down my spine. She really is Joe's insurance policy.
Some people have problems with intelligent, competent women.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
If that offends you, vote for Trump. Oh, wait ...
He's pretty much demented now, presently bragging about acing a mental exam that a child could pass. He knows nothing about how government works (he asking congressional Republicans to help him with his criminal problems). He has authoritative knowledge of nothing but grifting and social parasitism.
Sure he can, and it wouldn't be demented. Unlike with Trump, with Biden, you would see an understanding of issues articulated with an adult vocabulary in responsive, compound sentences.
Only the Democrats are governing, and only to the extent that the hapless American voter allows them. They welcomed the Republicans back in the House, and suddenly, progress ceased and the House became political theater only.
Ten Republicans voted for the second Trump impeachment. Four were primaried for it (includes Cheney), and four decided not to run again (includes Kinzinger). Gonzales and Buck are Republican House members who dared to break rank and are now targeted for destruction for dissenting about impeachment inquiries.
I do, but I doubt I agree with what you would call unjust or oppressive governmental power if you see that as characterizing the Democrats. What do you have in mind? Many used that word - tyranny - to describe mask and vaccine mandates. Or maybe you consider gun control oppression, or taxing billionaires or law enforcement and all of these indictments.
I consider oppression closer to things like besetting LGBTQ, forcing women to bring unwanted pregnancies to term, and book banning. Do the Democrats do that?
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
Watch this interview:
Do you think Biden could sit for over an hour and answer questions?
Omg, you have got to be kidding me. You think Biden could sit down for one hour and answer questions like Trump did in the video above? Biden is cognitively challenged now, just listen to him.
And thank god for that. The democrats are not governing they are enforcing their rule on us. They are telling us what kind of lightbulb we can have or what kind of ceiling fan we ca have. No one in congress voted on these laws being enacted. They are threatening parents, spying on Catholics, jailing abortion protesters, putting political opponents in jail, making up crimes of political opponents, protecting Biden and his son for their crimes, protecting Hillary and her crimes, inviting migrants into the country some of them violent or terrorists, spending trillions.
Disagreeing with LGBTQ is not tyranny, protecting human life is not tyranny. No one is banning books. What book cannot you get today, right now?
Dems successfully controlled speech through social media. Musk exposed them with twitter. They were in collusion with Twitter to suppress speech they did not like. That is oppression and tyranny.
There are people, especially within some religious groups, for whom the most terrifying thing they can think of is a woman reading a book.
....while exposing her hair.
"Disagreeing" with LGBTQ is like disagreeing with the weather. Useless. It's there, live with it, and pretending it's not is stupid.
Forcing a girl to have a baby she doesn't want and may well not have consented to getting pregnant with, or may die carrying to term isn't "protecting human life." It's turning her into something less than human, someone whose will doesn't count for much.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Did you listen to the interview of Trump on NBC whereas he said he ran against Obama in 2016 and also again next year? Or are you going to give an excuse why we supposedly didn't hear what he clearly said?
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
I don't care if someone is LGBTQ etc. I care when it affects our lives negatively such as sports and indoctrination of our children without parents consent etc. Dems should be for liberty of thought and ideas, instead they are for ideology and party first.
Do you agree with abortion up until birth like the official stance of the democrat party? or not?
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
How does this answer my question about Biden not being able to sit for an hour answering questions?
No, I do not! UNLESS there is excellent evidence that the mother's life will be at grave risk. I have written on this here in these forums on a number of occasions.
I am not in favour of abortion at all, certainly not past the potential viability of the fetus if removed from the womb prematurely. I hugely prefer educating children so that can be responsible when their natural urges overcome them (and this happens). I hugely prefer that girls and women are not raped. I hugely prefer that people who aren't ready for children yet, but are sexually active, will practice safe sex and be diligent in the use of birth control measures. I hugely prefer that girls tell willful boys -- who complain that the condom interferes with their pleasure -- to get over it, or go home and do it by yourself.
But I recognize that my preferences aren't always going to be realized, nor do I have any reason to expect that they should. And at the end of the day, I have to say that when a girl or woman has this choice to make, it is hers alone, and certainly not mine. But I do think, surely, the first 3 months, or at worst, 24 weeks, is time enough to make the decision. After 24 weeks, the likelihood of survival of the infant surpasses 50%.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
I have listened to him many times, and he seems much more "with it" than you. We have a choice in 2024, and in many of our opinions it may be voting for "the lesser of the two evils". Biden never was my choice, but he's much more intelligent and honest than Trump.
Folks should take a long hard look at the above; it speaks volumes. This is particularly true when it's stripped of its vitriol, i.e., ...
Biden isn't making the majority of his decisions on his own. He relies heavily on his advisors.
This is what one would hope for from informed leadership in a democratic society. There is, however, a different leadership model, one characterized by extreme narcissism. It's the il Duce model. No one should be surprised to see Trump enthusiasts migrate in that direction.
We've seen this before.
Excerpted....
An early read of a New Hampshire rematch between Joe Biden and Donald Trump gives the incumbent president the advantage, amid signs that anger toward Trump could outweigh dampened enthusiasm for another Biden term, according to a new CNN/University of New Hampshire poll.
About 6 in 10 New Hampshire residents, 62%, say they would be dissatisfied or worse if Trump retook the presidency – with most, 56%, expressing outright anger at the prospect. A 56% majority say they’d be dissatisfied or worse if Biden won reelection, but fewer, 38%, say they’d be angry. About one-fifth say they’d be less than satisfied with either scenario.
But in a head-to-head matchup between Biden and Trump, a narrow majority, 52%, of potential 2024 voters in the state say they’d back Biden, with 40% favoring Trump and 8% unsure or saying they would back someone else. That’s a wider edge for Biden than in most recent national polling on the matchup, which has largely found a margin-of-error contest between the two most recent occupants of the White House.
An early read of a New Hampshire rematch between Joe Biden and Donald Trump gives the incumbent president the advantage, amid signs that anger toward Trump could outweigh dampened enthusiasm for another Biden term, according to a new CNN/University of New Hampshire poll.
About 6 in 10 New Hampshire residents, 62%, say they would be dissatisfied or worse if Trump retook the presidency – with most, 56%, expressing outright anger at the prospect. A 56% majority say they’d be dissatisfied or worse if Biden won reelection, but fewer, 38%, say they’d be angry. About one-fifth say they’d be less than satisfied with either scenario.
But in a head-to-head matchup between Biden and Trump, a narrow majority, 52%, of potential 2024 voters in the state say they’d back Biden, with 40% favoring Trump and 8% unsure or saying they would back someone else. That’s a wider edge for Biden than in most recent national polling on the matchup, which has largely found a margin-of-error contest between the two most recent occupants of the White House.