• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Big Bang is dead. Long live Big Bang?

questfortruth

Well-Known Member

The James Webb telescope has disproven that 13.7 billion years ago was Big Bang.
Dear professors of RF, will new age of 1000 0000 billion years solve all problems
and inconsistencies? Obviously, no. The stars cannot shine so long, because the fuel of the stars is limited.
So, Universe cannot be much older than 13.7 billion years.

Perhaps it is only 6000 years?
 
Last edited:

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion

The James Webb telescope has disproven that 13.7 billion years ago was Big Bang.
Dear professors of RF, will new age of 1000 0000 billion years solve all problems
and inconsistencies? Obviously, no. The stars cannot shine so long, because the fuel of the stars is limited.
So, Universe cannot be much older than 13.7 billion years.

Perhaps it is only 6000 years?

Or you are a variant of a Boltzmann Brain?
 

Yerda

Veteran Member
The James Webb telescope has disproven that 13.7 billion years ago was Big Bang.
Weird. I've heard this claim several times now and not one astronomer or cosmologist working at JWT has said anything remotely similar. I think you've been duped by hoaxers: The James Webb Space Telescope never disproved the Big Bang. Here's how that falsehood spread.

If they could prove the BB never happened it would be a massive achievement in furthering our understanding the universe.
 

Suave

Simulated character

The James Webb telescope has disproven that 13.7 billion years ago was Big Bang.
Dear professors of RF, will new age of 1000 0000 billion years solve all problems
and inconsistencies? Obviously, no. The stars cannot shine so long, because the fuel of the stars is limited.
So, Universe cannot be much older than 13.7 billion years.

Perhaps it is only 6000 years?

JWT might have just imaged very ancient, huge, well-formed galactic formations defying current predictions. However, I'm confident there is a mundane explanation for this observation, such as cosmic dust or instrumental miscalibration. Cosmic dust between the distant galaxy and JWST might be scattering away blue light while allowing red light to pass through. Perhaps the apparent distant galaxies are due to their light having shifted toward the red and infrared spectrum wavelength ranges, not only because of cosmic expansion, but also because of intervening dust. Another very simple possible explanation is that, because JWST has only been in operational phase for a very limited time, JWT's online optics and electronics have not yet been properly calibrated. Even if JWT's initial observations are valid, the findings would require us to reconsider how matter forms into galaxies in the primordial Universe; they would not necessarily disprove the Big Bang.
 

Yerda

Veteran Member
Now it is not important. The public has decided.
You don't think the scientists have a better understanding?

You don't think an astronomer with data that questions one of the headline theories of physical science would be hopping, skipping and jumping to get this news out? It would make their name.
 

Suave

Simulated character
For fun, see video:


Possible water world spotted obiting an alien star
By Keith Cooper
published August 25, 2022

"The planet, of which up to 30% is made from water, will be a top target for the James Webb Space Telescope..

vopSioVPCEnd3sZh4ZHgJS-320-80.jpeg

An artist's impression of TOI-1452b orbiting one of the red dwarf stars in a binary system. (Image credit: Benoit Gougeon, Université de Montréal)

"{A habitable-zone ocean planet has been discovered orbiting a red dwarf in a binary star system 100 light-years away from Earth, and could provide a tantalizing target for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST or Webb) to study.

The exoplanet, cataloged as TOI-1452b, was initially spotted by NASA's Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), but because TESS was unable to resolve the binary system into its two stars, the transiting object's precise nature was uncertain. So, a team of astronomers led by Charles Cadieux, who is a Ph.D. student at the Université de Montréal in Canada, followed up on it.

The astronomers found that the stars, which are both red dwarfs, are split by 97 astronomical units (one astronomical unit, or AU, is the average distance between Earth and the sun, about 93 million miles or 150 million kilometers). They also confirmed that TOI-1452b orbits and indeed transits (moves in front of) one of the two red dwarfs. Based on the amount of the star's light blocked by the planet during the transit, Cadieux's team calculated that the planet has a diameter 1.67 times that of Earth and orbits its red dwarf star once every 11.1 days.

Cadieux's team then moved on to the Canada–France–Hawaii–Telescope located in Hawai'i, which houses an instrument called SPIRou that can measure the radial velocity of the planet's host star. Radial velocity refers to the amount by which the star "wobbles" back and forth as it is tugged by the gravity of its orbiting planet. Based on the radial velocity measurements of the star, TOI-1452b must have a mass about 4.8 times greater than Earth's.

Such worlds are termed "super-Earths" — too small to be gaseous, but larger and stranger than the terrestrial planets in our solar system. With the radius and the mass of TOI-1452b in hand, scientists could calculate its bulk density, and the result implies that 22% of the planet's mass, and perhaps as much as 30%, is made from water surrounding a rocky core. This is a similar proportion to the amount of ice on the frozen moons in our solar system, such as Jupiter's Europa and Saturn's Titan.

Unlike those icy moons, TOI-1452b is in the habitable zone of its star — the region around the star where temperatures are suitable for liquid water. Because red dwarfs are smaller than the sun and cooler, their habitable zones are scaled down and much closer in. If a planet in our solar system orbited the sun at the distance that TOI-1452b orbits its star, 5.7 million miles (9.1 million kilometers), it would be roasted. Around its red dwarf, however, TOI-1452b is comfortably temperate, and its water is very likely liquid.

"TOI-1452b is one of the best candidates for an ocean planet that we have found to date," Cadieux said in a statement(opens in new tab). "Its radius and mass suggest a much lower density than what one would expect for a planet that is basically made up of metal and rock, like Earth."

Its relative proximity to the solar system means that TOI-1452b has now joined a select group of temperate exoplanets that are close enough for JWST to study their atmosphere and to search for potential signs of life, called biosignatures."

"As soon as we can, we will book time on Webb to observe this strange and wonderful world," René Doyon, an astronomer at the Université de Montréal and principal investigator of one of JWST's instruments, said in the statement.

The discovery of TOI-1452b is described in a paper published on Aug. 12 in The Astronomical Journal.


An Ocean Planet With The Possibility Of Life Found 100 Light-Years Away From Earth@The Cosmos News
 
Last edited:
Top