• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bigfoot caught on eagle nest cam in Michigan?

McBell

Unbound
Well. Its silly until he walks into your camp and
breaks your guitar like in the exclusive footage that Revoltingest provided us.....Then its not so funny anymore. :(:D:p
Guess that depends entirely on which end of the camera you are on....
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
Yes we do, silly isn't it ?.
How do you conclude it is just 'silly'. To me the quantity, quality and consistency of the reports does not allow me to dismiss it as 'silly'. Have you read or heard the reports of many of the claimants? Their smell, size, appearance sounds pretty consistent.

(btw; I don't think it is just another animal either)
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
How do you conclude it is just 'silly'. To me the quantity, quality and consistency of the reports does not allow me to dismiss it as 'silly'. Have you read or heard the reports of many of the claimants? Their smell, size, appearance sounds pretty consistent.

(btw; I don't think it is just another animal either)
Who knows, its never been proven, well at least 100%, these myths will always be around, its just our nature to have them.
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
Who knows, its never been proven,
OK, you are backing down from your 'silly' claim.:) I know there are intelligent researchers and claimants.
well at least 100%, these myths will always be around, its just our nature to have them.
There is also the tendency for people to dismiss with vehemence things outside their normal range of experience.
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
OK, you are backing down from your 'silly' claim.:) I know there are intelligent researchers and claimants.

There is also the tendency for people to dismiss with vehemence things outside their normal range of experience.
We can only experience what we experience with our senses, if there is a Bigfoot, then we will see it, or feel it or smell it, but we need the Bigfoot first, and so far there hasn't been no Mr Bigfoot, only silly videos and pics. I remember years ago they said they had picture of the Bigfoot, until they noticed he was wearing a watch lol.
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
@Wu Wei on a night out perhaps?

I have a lot of relatives in Michigan...likely 100s, literally..... and all I can say is I don't recognize it as any of them.... but then I could walk right past most of them and not recognize then either.... and no..it wasn't me...I try and stay out of Michigan
 

VioletVortex

Well-Known Member
I doubt most reports like that. I don't believe in cryptids in the literal sense, as a species with a population so small that people wouldn't normally notice it wouldn't sustain itself at that population. Most reports of cryptids are the result of optical illusions of some kind.
 

Akivah

Well-Known Member
I doubt most reports like that. I don't believe in cryptids in the literal sense, as a species with a population so small that people wouldn't normally notice it wouldn't sustain itself at that population. Most reports of cryptids are the result of optical illusions of some kind.

I agree. In order for the Bigfoot species to exist, there would have to be populations of them, along with babies, youngsters, elderly, along with their corpses. Since none of that exists, it proves to me that everything Bigfoot is just a hoax.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
We can only experience what we experience with our senses, if there is a Bigfoot, then we will see it, or feel it or smell it, but we need the Bigfoot first, and so far there hasn't been no Mr Bigfoot, only silly videos and pics. I remember years ago they said they had picture of the Bigfoot, until they noticed he was wearing a watch lol.
That's always been the problem.

From Bigfoot to Ghosts to Aliens and whatever. Just silly videos continually being put up that are never clear or authentic with most, if not all being just outright fakes made for a whole slew of reasons. Its so overblown and common that no one will take these things seriously anymore in any genuine sense.

Speaking specifically of Bigfoot, one would think by this time something would already be verified, considering that there must be a substantial supporting population to even warrant the amount of claims and sightings that come in to support existance of Bigfoot.

We don't even see that.
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Despite his denial, I think there is a good chance its wu wei. I want to know his whereabouts at the time of the footage. :cool:
 

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
So SG, What kind of mythical beasts do you have in Saudi Arabia? :)

There is one of a woman with goat legs. Some people believe it is a demon that lives near graveyards and due to our cultural dressing code for women, they are difficult to identify.

Another is related to cannibalism. Some believe that there are people who eat people and they are identified by their dark skin and tails.

:flushed:
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Yes we do, silly isn't it ?.

Seriously though. Historically many cultures have their legends about wild hairy humanoid creatures. Are these legends cultural memories of real creatures handed down through the centuries? Our ancient relatives no doubt had contact with some pretty strange animals. We know about gigantopithicus in Asia. Good candidate for the Bigfoot legends. How close to present time did they survive? Dont know. And who in the world let him on a boat to Australia? :)
 
Top