tytlyf
Not Religious
When dealing with terrorists would you prefer which of the following?no one
Drone strikes
Boots on ground
?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
When dealing with terrorists would you prefer which of the following?no one
As I stated before, there has not been any concerted policy set forth by this or the past administrations.No one knows how to effectively deal with radical Islamist. Not even GWB as indicated by the attack on 9-11....Which there was ample intelligence provided leading up to the event. He and all of his staff were briefed about the potential threat. His blunder on Weapons Of Mass Destruction was an outright lie that cost us lives and money. So it would seem, by your logic, none of our officials can deal effectively with with those who seek to cause us harm. You can't prevent every attack...
When dealing with terrorists would you prefer which of the following?
Drone strikes
Boots on ground
?
The answer to dealing with terrorism is science and technology to monitor airwaves, media, satellite, etc.Probably a combination of both along with some new ideas on how to deal with them beyond the past and present policies. No, I do not have the answer, but I'm sure it is out there somewhere.
What is the point of this thread...?
The point is to show that the Obama Administration didn't in fact deal a decimating blow to Al Qaeda by taking out Osama bin Laden and putting all of their top ranking officials on the run. The increased "chatter" is supposed to prove this. Apparently, since Al Qaeda still exists, that means Obama sucks.
What does that say about Bush, who couldn't even find Osama?
Do you really think that Obama found bin-Laden? If I remember correctly it was information obtained from various sources and at various times that covered the Bush and Obama time period. As much as there are those that say Obama got bin-Laden they are incorrect. Seal Team 6 got bin-Laden, all Obama did was give the go order. Saying that Obama got bin-Laden would be the same as saying that Truman won WWII.
no one
As I stated before, there has not been any concerted policy set forth by this or the past administrations.
The point is to show that the Obama Administration didn't in fact deal a decimating blow to Al Qaeda by taking out Osama bin Laden and putting all of their top ranking officials on the run. The increased "chatter" is supposed to prove this. Apparently, since Al Qaeda still exists, that means Obama sucks.
Do you really think that Obama found bin-Laden? If I remember correctly it was information obtained from various sources and at various times that covered the Bush and Obama time period. As much as there are those that say Obama got bin-Laden they are incorrect. Seal Team 6 got bin-Laden, all Obama did was give the go order. Saying that Obama got bin-Laden would be the same as saying that Truman won WWII.
Of course... Obama only gets credit for being in charge of the military when Republicans want to accuse him of war crimes... Obama is currently catching a tremendous amount of flak from the right because of the NSA spying programs, which have been around since the Internet has.
Alqueda can't silenced...unless there's a concerted effort by muslims to silence them. Alqueda has been decimated but not destroyed. Various terrorist attacks can have little to do with Alqueda and everything to do with some small faction of extremism. I'm sure Alqueda isn't some centralized organization of terrorst...rather they are a splinter of extremist with far reaching abilities to cause small and large destruction. Taking out Osama was never viewed as the end of Alqueda and if people were thinking that then that's on them for being foolish to believe such a notion. Personally I believe Obama has been effective on terrorism but I'm sure others, who already dislike him for other reasons, feel differently about his record on terrorism.
I agree.
I simply think that the Republican glee over this Al Qaeda chatter has more to do with acting as if the victories that the Obama administration has had against Al Qaeda were nothing. They need Obama to be a failure in everything, and since he hasn't failed on this account, they need to make it look like he has.
And has had bipartisan support during its re-authorization....Don't get me wrong...I think the NSA and FBI need a little more oversight in this area but as an IT guy and an IT guy who worked for federal govt. I know how difficult it can be as technology advances and hackers become more savvy and sophisticate.
I personally have no problem with the NSA programs. I see no reason to be surprised that an espionage agency spies on people. As long as they're not beating my door down and carrying me off in the middle of the night (which they have no reason to do), I don't care what they do.
Would you like to give me your password for your email and your religiousforums account please?Yeah, this is where I'm at. I personally haven't seem anything they (NSA/FBI) were/are doing that upsets me. It's got some libs and a lot of libertarians all upset as well as some conservatives....Many going on and on about their privacy and civil liberties that they freely give away daily over the internet.
Would you like to give me your password for your email and your religiousforums account please?
I want access to your sent/received emails please and also your post history of this site including frubals given and received and all PM's. You don't have to give me your password if you don't want it, you can print screen everything for me.Is the NSA making posts for you?