Facebook is being boycotted by Muslims generally and Arabs specifically today for continuously removing the "Third Palestinian Intifada" page under the Israeli pressure.
God willing, I am sharing. But I am wondering why do we have to protest and the creator/the executive of the website will definitely be against our cause?
Why don't we create our own social networking website that can embrace our cause, our revolutions, our worries, etc? Why do we have to rely on Facebook and Twitter, etc? Especially that we have seen how such websites can be a good means of communication in our pursuit of change?
Why do we have to threaten to boycott Facebook every time they close an Islamic page or a page about the Palestinian cause and we can have our Islamic or Arabic website that serves the same purpose with more options that can suit these moments that we live?
Do we expect the administration to be fair towards us? I personally don't expect this.
God willing, I am sharing. But I am wondering why do we have to protest and the creator/the executive of the website will definitely be against our cause?
Why don't we create our own social networking website that can embrace our cause, our revolutions, our worries, etc? Why do we have to rely on Facebook and Twitter, etc? Especially that we have seen how such websites can be a good means of communication in our pursuit of change?
Why do we have to threaten to boycott Facebook every time they close an Islamic page or a page about the Palestinian cause and we can have our Islamic or Arabic website that serves the same purpose with more options that can suit these moments that we live?
Do we expect the administration to be fair towards us? I personally don't expect this.
Last edited: