Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What are your thoughts?
I believe @Augustus is up on this and it came to not even half.Brits pay for their healthcare. 12% of earning every week, every month, every year throughout your life whether you are ill or not.
For that healthcare is guaranteed if you dont mind waiting, often months or more for your intervention.
Does that add up to more than you pay?
There are always ill people. Always. When you accept that you are not paying into a personal system, but are actually paying into a collective system that treats and serves millions of people every day, and that - at some point in your life - you are guaranteed to need, pointing this out is basically a non-argument. At least, not for people who see beyond pure, cynical self-interest.Brits pay for their healthcare. 12% of earning every week, every month, every year throughout your life whether you are ill or not.
That depends entirely on your personal need. Are there problems with wait times on the NHS? Of course (although a large part of that is due to significant shortages in funding from our apathetic Conservative government who actively try to gut the NHS every chance they get). But if you are in need of emergency medical treatment, you get it. And there's no massive bill waiting for you when you wake up that will potentially (in fact, quite likely) bankrupt you. Couple this with the fact that, overall, the American healthcare system is actually vastly worse than the NHS in many important areas (such a infant mortality and preventable diseases), and having to wait a little longer for treatment doesn't seem like a serious, good-faith concern.For that healthcare is guaranteed if you dont mind waiting, often months or more for your intervention.
Yes.Does that add up to more than you pay?
There are always ill people. Always. When you accept that you are not paying into a personal system, but are actually paying into a collective system that treats and serves millions of people every day, and that - at some point in your life - you are guaranteed to need, pointing this out is basically a non-argument. At least, not for people who see beyond pure, cynical self-interest.
I mean, you pay for roads with your taxes, but you don't use all the road all of the time, do you? But the fact is that the roads not only exist for personal use by you, but as a collective benefit for use by ALL people that benefits you in a myriad of ways - even if you never use them.
Also, in overall terms, a British citizen spends far, far less per capita on healthcare than a US citizen does, and it takes up less of our GDPR.
SOURCE: Reality Check: Does UK spend half as much on health as US?
That depends entirely on your personal need. Are there problems with wait times on the NHS? Of course (although a large part of that is due to significant shortages in funding from our apathetic Conservative government who actively try too gut the NHS every chance they get). But if you are in need of emergency medical treatment, you get it. And there's no massive bill waiting for you when you wake up that will potentially (in fact, quite likely) bankrupt you.
Yes.
Rather than having a system that the majority of our citizens can't use, and that often bankrupts those who do, it's worth infinitely more.
Where on earth are you getting that figure from? The estimates I've found place per capita spending per person in the UK at around $4,000, whereas American spending is over $10,000 per capita.But my point was, the average brit will pay around £135000 ($175000) in national insurance throughout their life. What does the average American spend on healthcare?
Lifetime vs. per annum?Where on earth are you getting that figure from? The estimates I've found place per capita spending per person in the UK at around $4,000, whereas American spending is over $10,000 per capita.
SOURCE: Health resources - Health spending - OECD Data
Are you assuming that the entirety of our taxable income is going to the NHS?
Where on earth are you getting that figure from? The estimates I've found place per capita spending per person in the UK at around $4,000, whereas American spending is over $10,000 per capita.
SOURCE: Health resources - Health spending - OECD Data
Are you assuming that the entirety of our taxable income is going to the NHS?
This appears to be per annum.Lifetime vs. per annum?
But not all of our national insurance goes to the NHS. Again, see the actual spending on the NHS per capita I've linked to.12% of average lifetime income
No assumption. National insurance is 12% of income between £166 and £962 per week, i think that covers the vast majority of wage earners.
Of course there are those not earning a wage and children not taken in to account.
I can't say what I really feel, but the idea you have to pay $2,500 to get an ambulance to visit you and a lot of the other stuff in that video is like hearing you strip naked, have incestuous relations within you own family members in public, whilst living in your own filth and excrement and fighting over table scraps from food and water shortages.
That's how far outside the spectrum of civilised you are. It make me feel violent.
That's legally as close as I can get to saying how I feel. I really don't know if I can legally say anything beyond that.
But not all of our national insurance goes to the NHS. Again, see the actual spending on the NHS per capita I've linked to.
There are countless Americans who've been financially ruined by medical debt or who are forgoing critical care because they can't afford it, but still oppose universal healthcare because they've been brainwashed into believing that it will magically turn the U.S. into the U.S.S.R.
Wait? You Americanstanis have to pay for a ****ing ambulance?!!! A goddamned ambulance? Do you also have to pay fire fighters to save your house? And to hold your own baby you have to pay money for that? And to give birth in a hospital even?!!!
Wait? You Americanstanis have to pay for a ****ing ambulance?!!! A goddamned ambulance? Do you also have to pay fire fighters to save your house? And to hold your own baby you have to pay money for that? And to give birth in a hospital even?!!!
View attachment 34880
I’ll never complain about Medicare wait times ever again!