That is not possible because the methods used by Science can not be applied to GOD. He is outside the realm of Time and Space, and not subject to lab experiments. Depending on your reasons for asking, you have to use your own reasoning to discover evidence for God if you are interested.
On the contrary: if God made a physical thing that we can analyze, we can also investigate reverse engineering that physical thing. BTW, if you want to quote scientific articles, I was always taught to go no further back than 3-5 years as a lot can change. Still, at least you quote someone in the 21st century. That's better than most Christian creationists, who seem to think scholars stopped writing papers in the 1800s.
(They made a movie, God's Not Dead (2014), with that plot afterwards.)
I've only seen clips of it, but it makes people dumber with every spoken word.
In my long life, I have seen time and again the Bible being found true in archaeological finds. (I don't expect you to agree)
I'm not going to agree either.
It is again a war on believers of the Bible and on the Bible itself.
Idolatry's a sin. Maybe believe in a deity, not a book?
We are now in the much proclaimed sixth extinction - biological annihilation by human hands. What fine work our science has produced. Don't you think!
The bible promised global annihilation and had no idea of science (or, at least, modern stuff).
Yes, I like my Android tablet, my phones, and PCs, my cars, and washing machines, but at the expense of the earth!
To be honest, the world will get by fine without either one of us. We are destroying the planet for US, not the planet as a whole. It didn't need humans for millions upon millions of years and it won't need us when we're gone again. We are just an ecological niche that is easily filled by whatever else comes along.
And if you disagree, ask yourself why God says He loves us so much yet threatens annihilation all the time. We clearly are not "God's gift to Creation" or anything if we can be tossed aside so easily like a broken pencil, right?
The US has been the global leader in science, for a century or more
And we're destroying all that progress because of some troglodytes.
For me the more important observation and test is that creationism has not contributed a single thing to our scientific understanding of the world in at least a century, while evolutionary theory has not only contributed enormously, it's been the unifying framework of the life sciences for over 100 years.
Yes, Jesus told us to judge a tree by its fruit. The fruit from Creationism has been rather lackluster, no?
At the end of the day the "RNA-world" hypothesis remains problematic. RNA and its components are difficult to synthesize under the best of circumstances, in a laboratory, let alone under plausible prebiotic conditions. Once RNA is synthesized, it can make new copies of itself only with a great deal of chemical coaxing from the scientist. Overbye notes that "even if RNA did appear naturally, the odds that it would happen in the right sequence to drive Darwinian evolution seem small."
I think this is a very informative book regarding genetics
Ponder what a small book said circa 2000 years ago, and don't forget that then the earth was fairly pristine, man's ability to destroy the earth, not even thought possible: "18 And the nations were wroth, (speaking of right now)
You might want to read an environmental history of mankind or something. The ancients weren't as pristine as they should've been, especially when metal items started becoming a thing.
This is to show us what happens when we rule.
It also shows a marked amount of utter neglect by the Ruler of the World, no?
We are not the kings of this world. We are the maintenance crew and it's up to the Boss to make sure everything's going okay.
A religious person warning us the world is going to end any day soon? I hate to burst your bubble but every generation has had religious people claiming this.
Yeah, I'll be 40 this year and have already survived multiple apocalypses.
The teaching that is quite well known, even quoted, yet, ignored - is this: "and then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn. . ."
Jesus is coming from the sky on a white horse. Funny, is he going to borrow Vishnu's, who also promised to do such a thing next time?
Much medicine is simply poison to the body so that less is more, and more is less. Here, it is paramount that the individual is personal involved and responsible for their own health care (plenty of exercise and healthy food). It is about money in that business, not about helping the sick. Look at how diabetes has succumbed to greed in regard to insulin.
Not everyone who is diabetic is so due to dietary issues. If you think so (I'm an RN, btw), you don't know a whole lot about medicine. Yes, I get that there are con jobs in medicine, but I also think it pales in comparison to "if you give the pastor a dollar, God will cure you of your cancer", right?
