• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can Atheists Call Life A Miracle?

MonkeyFire

Well-Known Member
If there were a messiah, and I don’t know why there wouldn’t be, it would be a miracle to save mankind, and deliver us into bliss. God can save!
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Personally, I believe all of existence is a miracle. Is it possible for one to believe this if they don’t think a God is responsible for it? Id have to say no. I think that persons description of all of existence would come from a science book. They may say life is great but they couldn’t call it a miracle.
With the existence of so many parasites and predators (plus whatever else) - and not the pretty picture of life seen at a glance - I suspect the word miracle would be somewhat devalued when one does actually have a closer look at life - and mostly made possible by science of course. o_O
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
Personally, I believe all of existence is a miracle. Is it possible for one to believe this if they don’t think a God is responsible for it? Id have to say no. I think that persons description of all of existence would come from a science book. They may say life is great but they couldn’t call it a miracle.
It depends on exactly what you mean by the word. Miracle can obviously be used in figurative or rhetorical contexts that obviously aren't meant to be taken literally.

Taken literally, the word essentially means "Something that can't happen but has happened" which is obviously logically impossible. The implication is that there is something capable of breaking or circumventing some predefined set of fundamental rules of existence. I would argue that would just mean that the rules aren't as definitive as initially thought (or are simply wrong), and the exception is just part of it. That would mean something using the exception isn't any more "miraculous" than something following the core rule.

There are plenty of perfectly mundane examples of physical laws we once thought were definitive but that exceptions were subsequently found for. That doesn't make the exceptions "miracles" though, just that the laws need refining or replacing. Even beyond the mundane, it wouldn't need to be a god who could demonstrate the gaps in the rules of existence as we currently understand them.

So, I wouldn't describe all of existence as a miracle even if I did believe a god (yours or any other) was responsible for it. In fact, if an all-powerful deity could simply bring it in to existence without a second thought, would doing so even be figuratively miraculous.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
Life is a sequence of events beginning with the BB (or whatever), made possible by entropy and continued by evolution.
Miracle... No,
But glad it happened
BB and evolution. You have no clue how the BB took place or abiogenesis took place. no idea. No proof. No evidence. No theory.

But of course you ignore them altogether. No choice.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
Why single out entropy from all of the many
physical laws? I vote for giving gravity a lot
of credit.


The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is the only law in all of physics which distinguishes the future from the past. All the other laws, at least in classical physics, are time symmetrical.

That’s what gives entropy it’s metaphysical significance.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is the only law in all of physics which distinguishes the future from the past. All the other laws, at least in classical physics, are time symmetrical.

That’s what gives entropy it’s metaphysical significance.
It's not significant to just life.
It's how the universe works.
Life is merely part of the universe.
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is the only law in all of physics which distinguishes the future from the past. All the other laws, at least in classical physics, are time symmetrical.

That’s what gives entropy it’s metaphysical significance.
It's been a while, but I thought that wave function collapse is also asymmetrical.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
It's not significant to just life.
It's how the universe works.
Life is merely part of the universe.

If the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics truly describes how the universe works, then when the universe reaches thermal equilibrium, it will quite literally be the end of time.
 

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
It depends on exactly what you mean by the word. Miracle can obviously be used in figurative or rhetorical contexts that obviously aren't meant to be taken literally.

Taken literally, the word essentially means "Something that can't happen but has happened" which is obviously logically impossible. The implication is that there is something capable of breaking or circumventing some predefined set of fundamental rules of existence. I would argue that would just mean that the rules aren't as definitive as initially thought (or are simply wrong), and the exception is just part of it. That would mean something using the exception isn't any more "miraculous" than something following the core rule.

There are plenty of perfectly mundane examples of physical laws we once thought were definitive but that exceptions were subsequently found for. That doesn't make the exceptions "miracles" though, just that the laws need refining or replacing. Even beyond the mundane, it wouldn't need to be a god who could demonstrate the gaps in the rules of existence as we currently understand them.

So, I wouldn't describe all of existence as a miracle even if I did believe a god (yours or any other) was responsible for it. In fact, if an all-powerful deity could simply bring it in to existence without a second thought, would doing so even be figuratively miraculous.
Something following the “ core rule” is a wondrous miracle too.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
It's been a while, but I thought that wave function collapse is also asymmetrical.


Not sure tbh. I imagine Schrodinger’s equation works the same backwards as in time as it does forwards, but perhaps not. Feynman said no one understands quantum mechanics; I certainly don’t.
 

McBell

Unbound
Personally, I believe all of existence is a miracle. Is it possible for one to believe this if they don’t think a God is responsible for it? Id have to say no. I think that persons description of all of existence would come from a science book. They may say life is great but they couldn’t call it a miracle.
  • a highly improbable or extraordinary event, development, or accomplishment that brings very welcome consequences.
  • an amazing product or achievement, or an outstanding example of something.
Your argument only works if you think that God has to be involved for something to be a miracle.
Since the above shows that God is not required for something to be a miracle
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
Personally, I believe all of existence is a miracle. Is it possible for one to believe this if they don’t think a God is responsible for it? Id have to say no. I think that persons description of all of existence would come from a science book. They may say life is great but they couldn’t call it a miracle.
It is my understanding that whenever someone calls something a "miracle", what they really mean is that they have no understanding of how it occurred or could occur.

At other times, it is just a figure of speech. To note something with very low probability which has a positive outcome.
While things with equally low, or even lower, probability which has a negative outcome, is called just "bad luck".

In short, whenever things are called a miracle (in the literal supernatural sense), it generally just appeals to ignorance and / or incredulity.
It has very little meaning and below zero explanatory power.

Things tend to be miraculous only until real explanations are given.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
Well I think most atheists view all of existence as having always been here.
Technically, that is a true statement though.

Always = for all of time.
Time is an integral part of the universe. Aka, the space-time continuum.

So for all of time, a universe existed. If the universe is a coin, then one side is space and the other is time.
In our current understanding of the universe, you can't have time without the expanding universe and vice versa.

Take all of history / all of time. Pick any point in time. Did the universe exist then? Answer: yes.
For all of time, the universe existed.

At no point in time in history, did the universe NOT exist.

Hence, the universe has always exists (where always = all of time)
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
It is my understanding that whenever someone calls something a "miracle", what they really mean is that they have no understanding of how it occurred or could occur.

At other times, it is just a figure of speech. To note something with very low probability which has a positive outcome.
While things with equally low, or even lower, probability which has a negative outcome, is called just "bad luck".

In short, whenever things are called a miracle (in the literal supernatural sense), it generally just appeals to ignorance and / or incredulity.
It has very little meaning and below zero explanatory power.

Things tend to be miraculous only until real explanations are given.


See the definition offered in the post above yours
 

Viker

Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
Personally, I believe all of existence is a miracle. Is it possible for one to believe this if they don’t think a God is responsible for it? Id have to say no. I think that persons description of all of existence would come from a science book. They may say life is great but they couldn’t call it a miracle.
Words like amazing, incredible or outstanding could suffice in place of "miracle". Miracle may still imply something like divine intervention.
 
Top