The other side of the coin is Baha'is should yeach the cause of God, put forward the truth and refute that which is vain and false.
O my God, aid Thou Thy servant to raise up the Word, and to refute what is vain and false, to establish the truth, to spread the sacred verses abroad, reveal the splendors, and make the morning’s light to dawn in the hearts of the righteous.
When we're talking about the different major religions all having the same God as their source, even within one religion, Christianity, it's hard to convince the others about God and what is false and vain. So many of the major sects and denominations in Christianity, including the first and biggest, the Catholics, believe God is a Trinity. Already, if the Jews, Muslims and Baha'is are right, they don't even know who God is. Their belief is false. So they can't be from the same God, because they don't believe in the same God.
Then many Protestants believe that Catholics are worshipping statues and Mary. Oh, and then most Christians believe their God created a great and beautiful angel that fell and became Satan. So their God has a minor evil god that is warring against him. So who they describe as being their God is not the same God of the Jews, Muslims and Baha'is. Then add in Buddhists, Hindus and the others from India. How do each describe who their God is?
I think those details are important, and that to say that the source of all religions is the one and same God, is too simplistic. I see it as the same Baha'i argument that all religions are one. Yes, they have some similarities, but it discounts all the differences. And, because of the differences, I put the Baha'i concept of "progressive" revelation in there also.
I understand that to say one God revealed truth about himself by sending messengers to different people. That each of those messages was only meant to get people to grow spiritually and to be prepared for the next set of instructions. But that is not what it looks like to me. It's more like all people created their own concept of gods and God. The religions they created were very much influenced by their culture and the times. Many religious beliefs and practices were horrible and, thankfully, done away with. So ideas about God and religion evolved.
But, in all these cases, was the source the one true God, or people's ideas about God? That is more how I see it. Which allows for the differences and allows for the "progression" and changes over time. It allows for a lot of "creative" writing of Scriptures with great wonders and miracles, which never happened, but were meant to get people to believe that God is great and powerful.
But then we get to Jesus and Baha'u'llah. I could see the early Christians still adding in embellished spiritual stories of Virgin Births, miraculous healings, walking on water, rising from the dead and then floating off to space. I don't see them as "symbolic". I would see them as fictional, mythical stories to make Jesus a God/man... or, if true, he is a God/man. What I don't like about those things being true, though, is it means all the other religions are wrong.
The problems I have with the Baha'i Faith I keep pointing out, but the big one is that if the Baha'is are right, then every other religion, as believed and practiced, is still wrong. Too many fundamental, core beliefs are said to be wrong either by misinterpreting or taking literal things that were written as being figurative. As you know, I don't see it that way. If the event, like the resurrection didn't happen, then it's a lie, a hoax. But then, how'd they get away with it? But also, if it didn't happen, then their beliefs about God are based on a fictional story or worse, a hoax. So that would mean they didn't come from God, their religion came from a fabricated story that was taken to be true... that led them to make Jesus God. And that is not the same God that many of the other religions would believe in.
Then their is reincarnation. From the one true God or from people? But who is the Hindu God? Who is the Buddhist God? I took a college course on all this, but I don't remember. I have to depend on the people that follow and believe in those religions. And reincarnation is intrinsic to their beliefs. I personally would like it. I could use a few more chances to get things right. Especially if Christianity is right. But, even with Baha'is, I'm not going to get to a very high level in the spiritual world. Is everything perfect and believable in the different Hindu religions? No, but are they growing and changing... and improving? Yes. That's why I like what they say. And I'd hate to have them give up on their beliefs because Baha'is and other religions disagree with their belief in reincarnation.
Anyway, thanks Adrian and the rest of the Baha'is. Your threads are my favorites.