• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can Non-Abrahamics and Abrahamics be from same God?

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
All those things mentioned are clearly against the laws of God. Slavery was not introduced by the Bible but was an ancient practice that the Bible sought to moderate. Gradually Baha’u’llah in this day has abolished it in His Most Holy Book. Murder and killing are forbidden and so is rape and other such things in all the scriptures.

People who commit such atrocities in spite of their religion were disobeying the laws of their faith.

The Quran forbids war and aggression so their religion is not the cause. Only self defense is permitted. The Babis were attacked and defended themselves.

Neither God nor His Prophets or teachings have been the cause of one death. People, disobedient to the laws of love have committed these crimes.

Let’s take Jesus law of ‘love one another’. If everyone followed this one law all the wars you mentioned would never have happened. When people love money and power above love for each other then they kill. But people who love people and follow God’s law to harm no one, live in peace no matter which religion.

Obedience to the laws of love taught by God brings peace, happiness and brotherhood whilst turning away from God’s law of love towards hate and prejudice brings strife, conflicts, wars and untold grief, suffering and misery.

They all (ALL) considered their actions to be the will of their god

Moderate slavery? Have you actually read the bible? Baha’u’llah is NOT a biblical character.

Once again, to say murder and killing are forbidden and so is rape and other such things in all the scriptures indicates you have not read the OT

Nope. They are not disobeying, they are simply cherry picking different passages.

So you are saying the concept of Jihad does not come from the Qu"ran?

The abrahamic god murdered the entire population of the planet except a close buddy and the buddies family. Are you saying the innocent children and unborn fetuses that were murdered caused their own genocide?

Considering JC is a christian ideal i am pretty sure other religions would have (and still do) object to you forcing your belief on them.

You obviously saw my list above even if you pretend it wasn't there. Many of those wars were fought for precisely the reason you advocate. I.e. follow my religious rules.
 

Marcion

gopa of humanity's controversial Taraka Brahma
Although the Hindu, Budhism and other Non-Abrahamic Religions seem to be different than the Abrahamics ones, Can they be from the same God, but were revealed or manifested in different ways, based on cultural differences
Could God have spoke dharma, the way He did to Hindus, but in other cultures, He manifested Prophets as seen in Abrahamics.

Would this verse of Quran, explain it?

"To every People have We appointed [different] rites and ceremonies which they must follow: let them not then dispute with thee on the matter, but do thou invite (them) to thy Lord: for thou art assuredly on the Right Way. 2:67

Comment in bracket is by myself.
That is a horrible verse revealing a nasty sectarian side to the author of the Quoran.
Of course God is the Ultimate Reality beyond and within our temporary limited reality and does not in any way depend on any description by any religious or spiritual personality who authored or otherwise caused any scriptures.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
They all (ALL) considered their actions to be the will of their god

Moderate slavery? Have you actually read the bible? Baha’u’llah is NOT a biblical character.

Once again, to say murder and killing are forbidden and so is rape and other such things in all the scriptures indicates you have not read the OT

Nope. They are not disobeying, they are simply cherry picking different passages.

So you are saying the concept of Jihad does not come from the Qu"ran?

The abrahamic god murdered the entire population of the planet except a close buddy and the buddies family. Are you saying the innocent children and unborn fetuses that were murdered caused their own genocide?

Considering JC is a christian ideal i am pretty sure other religions would have (and still do) object to you forcing your belief on them.

You obviously saw my list above even if you pretend it wasn't there. Many of those wars were fought for precisely the reason you advocate. I.e. follow my religious rules.

I didn’t want to make the post too long but slavery if you study the Bible it didn’t invent it but tried to introduce rights for slaves. Look it up and you’ll find there’s many passages that do that. At that time slavery was so ingrained in society I believe that slavery could only be gradually outlawed. I see all the religions as one religion that progressively revealed laws according to our capacity.

No Jihad is not a concept of the Quran only self defense.the Abbasid and Umayyad dynasties forged Hadiths to try and legitimise holy war against the explicit teachings of the Quran which strictly forbid it.

These are many different translations of Sura 2:190 so you can get the gist that it’s not a translation error.

2: 190 And fight for the religion of GOD against those who fight against you; but transgress not by attacking them first, for GOD loveth not the transgressors.


George Sale

2:190 And fight for the cause of God against those who fight against you: but commit not the injustice of attacking them first: God loveth not such injustice:

J M Rodwell

2:190 Fight for the sake of God those that fight against you, but do not attack them first. God does not love aggressors.

N J Dawood

2:190 Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors.

Marmaduke Pickthall

2:190 AND FIGHT in God’s cause against those who wage war against you, but do not commit aggression –for, verily, God does not love aggressors.

Muhammad Assad

[2:190] You may fight in the cause of GOD against those who attack you, but do not aggress. GOD does not love the aggressors.

Rashad Khalifa

The Quran forbids premeditated murder

The Book of Samuel where you are talking about genocide was written by an unknown author and about 200 years after the event. We have no proof that it was authentic or accurate. It also goes against the law thou shalt not kill so I do not believe it is the revealed word of God as it was with Moses, Muhammad, Christ or Baha’u’llah.

People with evil intent do cherry pick to suit their murderous agendas but the proper context of any Holy Book supports only peace and goodwill.

I’m happy to go into more detail so feel most welcome.
 

Niblo

Active Member
Premium Member
...............

Please forgive my intervention.

‘We have appointed acts of devotion for every community to observe, so do not let them argue with you (Prophet) about this matter. Call them to your Lord – you are on the right path – and if they argue with you, say, ‘Allāh is well aware of what you are doing.’ On the Day of Resurrection, Allāh will judge between you regarding your differences.’ (Al-Hajj: 67-69).

This Medinan sūrah calls upon the early Muslims to persevere in following the faith of Abraham, rather than that of the polytheists, who had barred them from access to the Sacred Mosque. It is specific to a particular event.

Allāh (subḥānahu ūta'āla) tells us: ‘We have assigned a law and a path to each of you. If Allāh had so willed, He would have made you one community, but He wanted to test you through that which He has given you, so race to do good: you will all return to Allāh and He will make clear to you the matters you differed about.’ (Al-Ma’ida: 48).

The message is clear: Whatever path we happen to be on – whatever law we happen to follow – we are each of us called to do good.

Very best regards.
 

BilliardsBall

Veteran Member
Although the Hindu, Budhism and other Non-Abrahamic Religions seem to be different than the Abrahamics ones, Can they be from the same God, but were revealed or manifested in different ways, based on cultural differences
Could God have spoke dharma, the way He did to Hindus, but in other cultures, He manifested Prophets as seen in Abrahamics.

Would this verse of Quran, explain it?

"To every People have We appointed [different] rites and ceremonies which they must follow: let them not then dispute with thee on the matter, but do thou invite (them) to thy Lord: for thou art assuredly on the Right Way. 2:67

Comment in bracket is by myself.

All religions tend toward the following:

* One supreme being (even to Krishna for Hindus or the Great Spirit for Native Americans and other polytheists)
* Flood stories/judgment
* Devil stories
* Reliance upon God (trust) as salvation

There is ground for agreement between Islam and other faiths--however, since the Qu'ran teaches Jesus is not God, and the New Testament teaches Jesus is God and Savior, one cannot be a Christian and also a Muslim.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
Although the Hindu, Budhism and other Non-Abrahamic Religions seem to be different than the Abrahamics ones, Can they be from the same God, but were revealed or manifested in different ways, based on cultural differences
Could God have spoke dharma, the way He did to Hindus, but in other cultures, He manifested Prophets as seen in Abrahamics.

Would this verse of Quran, explain it?

"To every People have We appointed [different] rites and ceremonies which they must follow: let them not then dispute with thee on the matter, but do thou invite (them) to thy Lord: for thou art assuredly on the Right Way. 2:67

Comment in bracket is by myself.

Suggesion to God: be a better communicator or children heads might roll from that Maya Pyramid, just as an example of many.

Ciao

- viole
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
1. Agreed. There was never a time that humanity did not exist. I understand that’s what it means not you and I individually but humanity or man. There was never a time that man did not exist. I think you are reading this passage too literally. It is simply stressing to me that humanity always existed and always will and we are told the same by Baha’u’llah that even if we didn’t exist on earth we did exist somewhere else.

2. Very simple. We take on other garments or bodies but spiritual ones in spiritual worlds not this one again.so after death I understand we take in another form not another earthly body. That passage says bodies. The Baha’i teachings says that we take on a heavenly body. Which is not contradicting the Gita at all. Bodies can mean spiritual bodies or material bodies composed of elements of another world.

3. Krishna is speaking of eternal life that we are not annhilated and obliterated after deth but live on eternally.

4. Again the spirit or soul does not cease to exist when the body dies but lives on forever

5. Those who are detached from desire and self live in the spiritual realm in other words they are reborn spiritually and are free from attachment to this world and the suffering it causes.

I truly sincerely see no case whatsoever for reincarnation from the Gita except it is a misinterpretation for it quite easily can be explained differently without contradiction to mean the world hints I stated and not reincarnation.

I think in the Gita’s case that reincarnation is in the eyes of the beholder. I clearly see that there is no indication whatsoever of reincarnation from these verses as they can easily be interpreted to mean very logical and rationally acceptable truths other than reincarnation which the Bahai teachings fully support.

So in baha'i theology, God does not create human souls? Because the quoted Gita verses clearly says that the souls are beginningless and endless.
And saying that "neither I nor you have never not existed, nor will you or I ever cease to exist" does not, in any way whatsoever be taken to mean that somehow the human community has always existed.


Further consider Chapter 4 verse 5. Where He clearly says that both Arjuna and Himself have been reincarnated many times.


The Blessed Lord spoke:
Many of My births have passed away,
And also yours, Arjuna.
I know them all; You do not know them, Arjuna.

Although I am birthless and My nature is imperishable,
Although I am the Lord of all beings,
Yet, by controlling My own material nature,
I come into being by My own power.

For the protection of the good
And the destruction of evil doers,
For the sake of establishing righteousness,
I am born in every age.

Further consider Chapter 6, verse 40 Krishna talks about what happens to virtuous souls that do not attain perfection in one lifetime,

The Blessed Lord spoke:
Arjuna, neither here on earth nor in heaven above
Is there found to be destruction of him' ,
No one who does good goes to misfortune, My Son.

Attaining the worlds of the meritorious,
Having dwelt there for endless years,
He who has fallen from yoga is born again
In the dwelling of the radiant and the illustrious.

Or he may be born in the family
Of wise meditators
;
Such a birth as this is very difficult
To attain in the world.

There he regains the knowledge
Derived from a former body,
And he strives onward once more
Toward perfection, Arjuna.


How would you explain so many reference to rebirth in almost all chapters?
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I didn’t want to make the post too long but slavery if you study the Bible it didn’t invent it but tried to introduce rights for slaves. Look it up and you’ll find there’s many passages that do that. At that time slavery was so ingrained in society I believe that slavery could only be gradually outlawed. I see all the religions as one religion that progressively revealed laws according to our capacity.

Beating a slave to death is an attempt to reduce slavery?

So telling you how to beat your slaves is an attempt to reduce slavery?

Telling conquers they can take virgins of the conquered to use as sex slaves is an attempt to reduce slavery?


No Jihad is not a concept of the Quran only self defense.the Abbasid and Umayyad dynasties forged Hadiths to try and legitimise holy war against the explicit teachings of the Quran which strictly forbid it.

So the qu'ran does not say Muslims should “Fight the People of the Scripture until they pay the ransom tax and feel subdued.”

And

"Slay them where ye find them"

?

Sure there are different interpretations but the words are the words

People with evil intent do cherry pick to suit their murderous agendas but the proper context of any Holy Book supports only peace and goodwill.

Nonsense, a holy book only promotes peace among its followers.

I’m happy to go into more detail so feel most welcome.

Less detail would be better.
 

InvestigateTruth

Veteran Member
They also teach intolerance of diffetence, slavery, rape, theft, murder and genocide.

See my above post
Well, in our view, those were not based on true teachings of holy Books. In our view, Many people took advantage of Religion, by interpreting it the way the want.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Well, in our view, those were not based on true teachings of holy Books. In our view, Many people took advantage of Religion, by interpreting it the way the want.

Your view is your view.

i am glad you interpret your book as you do.

Unfortunately not all people do the same?
 

InvestigateTruth

Veteran Member
Beating a slave to death is an attempt to reduce slavery?

So telling you how to beat your slaves is an attempt to reduce slavery?

Telling conquers they can take virgins of the conquered to use as sex slaves is an attempt to reduce slavery?




So the qu'ran does not say Muslims should “Fight the People of the Scripture until they pay the ransom tax and feel subdued.”

And

"Slay them where ye find them"

?

Sure there are different interpretations but the words are the words



Nonsense, a holy book only promotes peace among its followers.



Less detail would be better.
The Quran chapters and verses were revealed gradually. Some of its commands were only for a specific time and place. The verse you are referring which says 'kill them when you find them', was revealed for a time, when the Muslims were attacked. It was to encourage a strong defense.

In fact, this what terrorist groups such as ISIS do. They take a verse out of its historical context, and use it to justify their motives. They have misused that same verse you are referring.
 

Marcion

gopa of humanity's controversial Taraka Brahma
Further consider Chapter 4 verse 5. Where He clearly says that both Arjuna and Himself have been reincarnated many times.


The Blessed Lord spoke:
Many of My births have passed away,
And also yours, Arjuna.
I know them all; You do not know them, Arjuna.

Although I am birthless and My nature is imperishable,
Although I am the Lord of all beings,
Yet, by controlling My own material nature,
I come into being by My own power.

For the protection of the good
And the destruction of evil doers,
For the sake of establishing righteousness,
I am born in every age.

Lord Krishna does not specify where His many births took place, so they may also have happened on (many) other planets in this huge universe. He also tells that He wills or controls His own incarnations, unlike ordinary human beings who take birth through their accumulated karma and don't remember their past incarnations.

Where ordinary human beings reincarnate to suit the need of their karma, the Lord reincarnates in order to suit the need of the elevated beings He has come to guide and instruct (in our case human beings). So He will appear differently and play a different role in every different age that He appears.

The mention of ages is interesting because it suggests a parallel with the Bahai idea of older and newer messengers who come with adjusted ideologies that are better suited for the more modern times.

I think the parallel is interesting but only on a superficial level because the ages that Krishna refers to are much larger than the Bahai ones and the status and impact of personalities like Lord Krishna is incomparable to that of messengers or prophets in the Abrahamic religions.
 
Last edited:

GoodbyeDave

Well-Known Member
Although the Hindu, Budhism and other Non-Abrahamic Religions seem to be different than the Abrahamics ones, Can they be from the same God, but were revealed or manifested in different ways, based on cultural differences
I find all the Abrahamic scriptures both irrational and immoral. If a supreme being exists, they could surely do better than that!

This looks like the typical Baha'i maneuver: claim all "prophets" really said the same thing to soften us up for the claim that they all paved the way for the Baha'i!
 

RoaringSilence

Active Member
No revelation from God has ever taught reincarnation; this is a man-made conception.
Please read the GGS ( guru grant sahib) in english. also the bhagwat geeta. both are monotheistic . guru nanak dev ji was a farmer before he got a revelation , there is no book that can be compared to the ggs for the remarkable way it was written it breaks the quran's surah like it challenge like a boss... the miracles that were performed by all of them have been documented .. Unless you believe that your "god" only speaks in western languages. Here is a link for GGS -

http://old.sgpc.net/CDN/English Translation of Siri Guru Granth Sahib.pdf


Both ggs and bhagwat geeta are monotheist and have reincarnation explained.
 

InvestigateTruth

Veteran Member
I find all the Abrahamic scriptures both irrational and immoral. If a supreme being exists, they could surely do better than that!

This looks like the typical Baha'i maneuver: claim all "prophets" really said the same thing to soften us up for the claim that they all paved the way for the Baha'i!
Hello,

The Bahais do not believe all Prophets said the same thing. They believe God appeared in different ways at different times and locations. We do not believe God is like a Robot who just repeats same thing again and again. We do not believe God ever reveals absolute truth. He reveals a relative truth each time in accordance to the requirements. His way is different each time He appears.
 

RoaringSilence

Active Member
i don't remember who said this in what post but one of the baha'i said that there is no EVIDENCE of krishna's existence.

Please watch this ..


 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
Japanese buddhism has had a lot of extra layers over the Buddhist Suttas that are the earliest extant Buddhist texts and the only ones that can be ascribed to Buddha or the followers of his times.

Wherever Buddhism was established we have the same problem of seperating cultural overlay from the 'pure' Buddhist Teachings. The problem is not helped by the vastness of literature that is attributed to Buddha and His Followers and the long span of time from Buddha Teaching (over 400 years) and the first written records.

For nearly 500 years Christians have been fixated in establishing the 'pure' Christian Teachings yet have become more divided than ever in the process. The Buddhists I've come across have generally avoided such issues.
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
If i remember right zen buddhism who is most know from Japan was founded by bodidharma ? I can not say so much about that teaching because i have not studied it :)

I understand Bodidharma introduced Buddhism to China. Buddhism in turn came to Japan through both China and Korea.
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
Although the Hindu, Budhism and other Non-Abrahamic Religions seem to be different than the Abrahamics ones, Can they be from the same God, but were revealed or manifested in different ways, based on cultural differences
Could God have spoke dharma, the way He did to Hindus, but in other cultures, He manifested Prophets as seen in Abrahamics.

I'm not exactly sure.

On one hand I cannot fathom why Vishnu (my first favorite form of God) would act or show himself in one way in the Mahabharata, Ramayana, and in the stories in the Puranas, and act or show himself another way, and say other things to Moses and the Hebrews, and to Muhammad. This is even stretching "everyone sees God in their own way" to its breaking point. If it's not the same God, then it's just another deity from another pantheon running amok in the cosmos, and running afoul of the smackdown Vishnu gonna lay on him. :D

On the other hand, if it is indeed the same God, and it's not God who misrepresented himself, then it's his followers, and let's call it like it is... Abrahamics... who completely misheard, misinterpreted and misunderstood what he was saying. But in fairness it's not only Abrahamics who have a talent for twisting what God says, Hindus on occasion have been known to do the same. So then God can't be held accountable for his followers, and the Rig Veda is correct: ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti "one truth the sages call by many names".

At the end of the day, people are free to worship whatever God or image of God appeals to them, just leave others alone to worship in their way.
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
i don't remember who said this in what post but one of the baha'i said that there is no EVIDENCE of krishna's existence.

No that would be a false memory as the Baha'i Writings confirm Krishna is a Manifestation of God.

There was a 10000 response plus OP that this was explained in, to which you participated in.

Regards Tony
 
Top