They are called *words*.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Can science create a word or an atom of the Universe/s from annihilation?
- Thread starter paarsurrey
- Start date
They are called *words*.
QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
A term is just another word for word. Terminologies are merely terms with a particular technical application. So terminologies ARE words, strictly speaking.
QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
Human beings create words all of the time. Esperanto is an entire language created by a Polish physician in 1887.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
The scientists make terminologies as science has no language of its own, as it is helpless, they don't make words strictly speaking. Please
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Sorry.
Book of fictions don't provide rational reasoning, while Quran provide them. So Quran is not a book of fiction. Please
Regards
Sorry, books of fiction provide lots of rational reasoning. Like War and Peace.
Please prove War and Peace to be less rational than Quran.
Thank you.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
A myth is out and out irrational, Quran provides rational reasoning. So Quran is not a book of myths. Please
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Please provide a quote from the book "War and Peace" which is most rational with consensus.
Regards.
QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
The book 1984 provides a very rational and reasoned argument against the concept of communism, yet it is a book of fiction. Thus the Quran, even if it might provide rational reasoning, can just as easily be a book of fiction. Please try again.
Umm everything in war and peace is rational. Ordinary but riveting and rational account of the lives of certain fictional families in the Russia during the Napoleonic wars.
I feel your premise in the first sentence is incorrect. How are you defining irrational?
Unfortunately, some people truly believe there is no value to fiction.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Yet one could not quote a passage from the book "War and Peace" that is rational with good reasoning when to make peace and when to make war. Please focus on this.
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
I never said that fiction has not utility. Please
Regards
Fair enough. There are people who find fiction to be frivolous and of no real value to learning. I feel such views are a source of opposition to the arts, and as such pose a threat to my values. So, you do feel we can learn lessons from stories that never occurred in a historical sense, correct?
Its not a book about that at all. Seriously, you have never heard of War and Peace? It about the experiences of people as they live through war and peace.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
My comments were for calling Quran by a poster as a book of fiction. Quran is the Revelation/Recitation for guidance of the humanity in ethical, moral and spiritual realms and it does that in a wonderful way. A book of fiction cannot do all these things. Please
Regards
While I believe a work of fiction CAN do all those things, I have no wish to seem like I am disrespecting your holy book so I will leave it at us disagreeing about the power of a good story.
InvestigateTruth
Veteran Member
This is true I think. But do you think it proves Quran is the Word of God?
Those who do not believe in Quran would say, a human being could have written Quran. So, in your view, what evidence or proof are there, that Quran is the Word of God?
Shad
Veteran Member
So what? No one claimed science produced it's own unique and complete language. Science is a tool not a thing.