12ver Shiism to me is the case for Ahlulbayt of Adam (peace be upon them) -> (fast forward) -> Family of Ibrahim (peace be upon them) --> Household of Musa and Haroun (peace upon them) --> House of Taha (Ali) and Yaseen (Mohammad) (peace be upon them).
It's always been the religion to submit to God through his door(s).
Revelation from God (scripture) + family of that reminder = rope of God.
If not Mohammad (s), then someone else would be the founder of a guidance from God.
But a book from God + an Ahlulbayt from God is proven by reasoning to me.
Thus the abstract form of religion proven by reasoning, I find, also that there is only one current possible instance of it (Quran + Ahlulbayt of Mohammad (s)).
But instead of looking at the details of the instance of religion and dealing with edge cases. I am going to be proving it's super structure and abstract form from reasoning.
I'm not going to be saying because Quran says so, it's true, rather, I'm going to be showing the reasoning of Quran as to why:
There needs to be revelation from God AND
There needs to be a chosen group known as the mystic family chosen by God in all times (there is always such a group of chosen sent ones)
These two combined make the rope of God.
I'm not saying Quran says so, so it's true. I'm saying the reasoning Quran shows for sending such a form of guidance proves:
(1) The abstract form of Islam is correct religion
Then I will talk why I believe Quran + Ahlulbayt of Mohammad (s) are that hard instance of the abstract archetype of the religion (2).
Most people are confused Quran distinguishes between the two, but they are in another sense interchangeable. Since (2) is a hard instance of (1).
Here I'm going to ignoring the hard copy. So we won't look at Quran being a miracle and why. However, the claim it is a miracle is important since the abstract religion would emphasize on scripture as a proof.
This is reasoning that will show the proper religion even if we lived in a time when Mohammad (s) was not sent yet.
This is what this thread is about, the abstract archetype form.
I believe when you recognize this form, you can recognize a particular instance of it, which differ to each other slightly in form, but over all, same structure (has features always same + some features differ depending on circumstance, time, place).
It's always been the religion to submit to God through his door(s).
Revelation from God (scripture) + family of that reminder = rope of God.
If not Mohammad (s), then someone else would be the founder of a guidance from God.
But a book from God + an Ahlulbayt from God is proven by reasoning to me.
Thus the abstract form of religion proven by reasoning, I find, also that there is only one current possible instance of it (Quran + Ahlulbayt of Mohammad (s)).
But instead of looking at the details of the instance of religion and dealing with edge cases. I am going to be proving it's super structure and abstract form from reasoning.
I'm not going to be saying because Quran says so, it's true, rather, I'm going to be showing the reasoning of Quran as to why:
There needs to be revelation from God AND
There needs to be a chosen group known as the mystic family chosen by God in all times (there is always such a group of chosen sent ones)
These two combined make the rope of God.
I'm not saying Quran says so, so it's true. I'm saying the reasoning Quran shows for sending such a form of guidance proves:
(1) The abstract form of Islam is correct religion
Then I will talk why I believe Quran + Ahlulbayt of Mohammad (s) are that hard instance of the abstract archetype of the religion (2).
Most people are confused Quran distinguishes between the two, but they are in another sense interchangeable. Since (2) is a hard instance of (1).
Here I'm going to ignoring the hard copy. So we won't look at Quran being a miracle and why. However, the claim it is a miracle is important since the abstract religion would emphasize on scripture as a proof.
This is reasoning that will show the proper religion even if we lived in a time when Mohammad (s) was not sent yet.
This is what this thread is about, the abstract archetype form.
I believe when you recognize this form, you can recognize a particular instance of it, which differ to each other slightly in form, but over all, same structure (has features always same + some features differ depending on circumstance, time, place).