• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Sargonski said:
What you are talking makes no sense .. that I will grant .. but none of what you are talking about was the argument being made.

When we compare the KJV to the Codex Sinaiticus there are discrepancies .. The word of God has been changed. This having nothing to do with a someone pretending to be you friend. and everything to do with the fact that there is huge discrepancy ..huge difference in the text from one to the other.

Do you understand that these discrepancies in the text have nothing to do with deperate evolutionists, . .. and that modern Bibles .. including the modern KJV .. goes to great lengths to point out the fact that this discrepancy exists .. and there is even a name for this discrepancy among theological types .. "Long ending of Mark" .. as opposed to the shorter ending that God intended.
Click to expand...
Sinaitiucs and Vaticanus are evil, wicked, corrupted and were produced by Satanists. They were never the word of God.
Have you nothing at all?
 
S

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
SavedByTheLord said:
Sinaitiucs and Vaticanus are evil, wicked, corrupted and were produced by Satanists. They were never the word of God.
Have you nothing at all?
Click to expand...

That is outstanding !! outstandingly ridiculous but outstanding never the less. Finally you spit up the poison lizard .. the belief that all Bibles prior to the 17th century were written by Satanists .. "Not the Inspired word of God" Got it :)

What took you so long .. everything is now clear ! but, there is a slight problem with this belief - which is that the KJV was created from these other Bibles .. and hence the KJV .. is the work of that which was produced by Satanists .. not the inspired word of God.

Wow .. glad we finally resolved that one :)
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Sargonski said:
That is outstanding !! outstandingly ridiculous but outstanding never the less. Finally you spit up the poison lizard .. the belief that all Bibles prior to the 17th century were written by Satanists .. "Not the Inspired word of God" Got it :)

What took you so long .. everything is now clear ! but, there is a slight problem with this belief - which is that the KJV was created from these other Bibles .. and hence the KJV .. is the work of that which was produced by Satanists .. not the inspired word of God.

Wow .. glad we finally resolved that one :)
Click to expand...
Sinaiticus may not have been written till after that.
I have called for S&V to be C-14 tested, that and all things that are claimed to be older than 6000 years .
Of course no one is going to do that.
Sorry Mark 16:9-20 has been the ending of Mark in almost all manuscripts ever.
The few that do not have the last 12 are Satanic of course.
Can you refute any of my claims, proofs?
Can you meet the challenge?
Can you answer any of the few questions I have asked or give a rational answer to the origin of anything?
 
ratiocinator

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
SavedByTheLord said:
Sinaitiucs and Vaticanus are evil, wicked, corrupted and were produced by Satanists
Click to expand...
lol.gif

When will you learn that just asserting something doesn't make it so?
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
ratiocinator said:
Pretty much anybody can refute your claims. I asked you where you had proved your claim that "Sinaitiucs and Vaticanus are evil, wicked, corrupted and were produced by Satanists" and you've run away again!!

You just couldn't make it up - except you obviously have. :joycat::joycat::joycat:
Click to expand...
I am here to help you because you need lots of help.
Start by reading the KJB.
 
F

F1fan

Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord said:
So, you cannot refute any of my claims.
Click to expand...
It's up to claimants to demonstrate their claims are true. As you see in many posts you fail to meet the standard. You rely too much on assumptions that the Bible is true at face value, and that is your fatal error. As is pointed out, to interpret the Bible literally is faulty because facts demonstrate much of it is NOT literally true. The Genesis stories are not literally true.
SavedByTheLord said:
Thanks for proving them and fulfilling prophecy .
Great job.
Click to expand...
Another bogus claim that you failed to demonstrate is true, or even possible.
SavedByTheLord said:
God has you giving him glory with each post.
Click to expand...
This sounds like a statement stated to help bolster fear, a self-affirmation. You show these signs that you have doubts that your religious beliefs are in error.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
F1fan said:
It's up to claimants to demonstrate their claims are true. As you see in many posts you fail to meet the standard. You rely too much on assumptions that the Bible is true at face value, and that is your fatal error. As is pointed out, to interpret the Bible literally is faulty because facts demonstrate much of it is NOT literally true. The Genesis stories are not literally true.

Another bogus claim that you failed to demonstrate is true, or even possible.

This sounds like a statement stated to help bolster fear, a self-affirmation. You show these signs that you have doubts that your religious beliefs are in error.
Click to expand...
All irrefutably proven.
 
ratiocinator

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
SavedByTheLord said:
When you can refute anything I claim post it
Click to expand...
It really isn't up to other people to refute what you say (although it's trivially easy to and it has been done many, many times on here), it's up to you to provide the reasoning and/or evidence.

You have not managed to support any of your silly assertions. They all boil down to assertions and circular arguments.

Look, I can just say "The KJB is full of lies and written by Satan." Now refute my claim! Go on! Bet you can't. :)
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
ratiocinator said:
It really isn't up to other people to refute what you say (although it's trivially easy to and it has been done many, many times on here), it's up to you to provide the reasoning and/or evidence.

You have not managed to support any of your silly assertions. They all boil down to assertions and circular arguments.

Look, I can just say "The KJB is full of lies and written by Satan." Now refute my claim! Go on! Bet you can't. :)
Click to expand...
You are the one who claims that there are errors.
Prove it.
It sis like someone who brags that they can lift a certain weight, but when asked to do do, can't.
 
ratiocinator

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
SavedByTheLord said:
You are the one who claims that there are errors.
Prove it.
Click to expand...
Already done. Several times by several people. Ignoring them just makes you and your faith look stupid. Is that really how you want it to be seen?

SavedByTheLord said:
It sis like someone who brags that they can lift a certain weight, but when asked to do do, can't.
Click to expand...
Talk about projecting your own faults onto others.... :rolleyes:
 
McBell

McBell

Unbound
SavedByTheLord said:
You are the one who claims that there are errors.
Prove it.
Click to expand...
Already been done.
Numerous times by numerous members.
Your ignoring them does not make them go away.

SavedByTheLord said:
It sis like someone who brags that they can lift a certain weight, but when asked to do do, can't.
Click to expand...
You have made so many bold empty claims that you are unable to keep up with them.
Funny how you can only present more bold empty claims in support of your bold empty claims.
Bold empty claims do not even evidence something, let alone prove anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top