Trailblazer
Veteran Member
So why does CG keep asking Baha'is about Hinduism?Good you asked a Baha'i rather than a Hindu, because a Hindu wouldn't know much about Hinduism, would they? samsara
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So why does CG keep asking Baha'is about Hinduism?Good you asked a Baha'i rather than a Hindu, because a Hindu wouldn't know much about Hinduism, would they? samsara
I believe he was making a point, but you'll have to ask him. Often when I try to make a point in that way it goes right over the head of the person I'm trying to make it to.So what does CG keep asking Baha'is about Hinduism?
So, lets see what point @CG Didymus was trying to make.I believe he was making a point, but you'll have to ask him. Often when I try to make a point in that way it goes right over the head of the person I'm trying to make it to.
You make the claim that Baha'u'llah uses the same terminology just interprets it differently.In Iqan, Bahaullah talks about Return, and He seems to be using same terminologies as used by those who believe in reincarnation. But He gives it, a different interpretation, thereby correcting any previous misinterpretation.
So I ask you, what was that terminology that you think is the same.What is the terminology used in Hinduism when they describe reincarnation?
You say "return and cycle"?Return and cycle.
Yes, now that he has said what that supposed "terminology" is, definitely please chime in.Good you asked a Baha'i rather than a Hindu, because a Hindu wouldn't know much about Hinduism, would they? samsara
Do you read all the posts or just the ones sent to you? I hope now you can see that it was Investigate Truth that made a claim about Baha'u'llah giving a different, which for Baha'is means the "true" interpretation. In other words, Baha'u'llah believes Hindus are wrong about what they believe about reincarnation.So why does CG keep asking Baha'is about Hinduism?
Yes, the point is Baha'is do interpret other religions in a way to make their beliefs, the Baha'i beliefs, the true ones, and the beliefs held by the other religions wrong... very often they say the people misinterpreted the things said in their own Scriptures. Is it? Is it a misinterpretation or is reincarnation very clearly stated in Hindu Scriptures? If so, then why would Baha'u'llah deny it and blame Hindus for wrongly interpreting their own Scriptures?I believe he was making a point, but you'll have to ask him.
The point is Baha'is say lots of stuff. If it is from Baha'u'llah that quote him. Quote how he says that Krishna and Hinduism are true... just not some of the things that Hindus believe. Small things? Not a big deal. Big things, like reincarnation? That is a big deal. Oh, and do Baha'is believe in all the incarnations of Vishnu or just Krishna? And if not the others, why Krishna?So, lets see what point (he) was trying to make.
I read some posts for which I get a notification, but not all of them...Do you read all the posts or just the ones sent to you? I hope now you can see that it was Investigate Truth that made a claim about Baha'u'llah giving a different, which for Baha'is means the "true" interpretation. In other words, Baha'u'llah believes Hindus are wrong about what they believe about reincarnation.
Therefore, he is right and Hindus are wrong? Unfortunately, that, to me, is a problem. Baha'is can say all religions are one, but they really mean they are one when redefined and reinterpreted
It all really depends on interpretation.
Yes, the Son, sacrificed His life for the people. The sin causes death. And Christ was resurrected. But in our view, sin is the cause of spiritual death, not the physical body.
Christ sacrificed His life, so, through His teaching people become righteous, and be endowed with everlasting spiritual life.
The meaning of His resurrection is, His cause was raised after His martyrdom, meaning the church which represented Him was resurrected not the physical body of Jesus.
But after some centuries, His words, which was like a good Tree, became old, and then was not giving fruits anymore, so, then the Father sent down His Word again through other Menifestations to teach the same truth as Jesus said, and even tell us more the things people could not bear at the time of Jesus. Just the Bahai view
Yes, the point is Baha'is do interpret other religions in a way to make their beliefs, the Baha'i beliefs, the true ones, and the beliefs held by the other religions wrong... very often they say the people misinterpreted the things said in their own Scriptures. Is it? Is it a misinterpretation or is reincarnation very clearly stated in Hindu Scriptures? If so, then why would Baha'u'llah deny it and blame Hindus for wrongly interpreting their own Scriptures?
I was not aware that Christians believe that Jesus Christ was raised as a spiritual body. I thought Christians all believe that the miracle is that His physical body was raised from the dead. I can believe that Jesus Christ showed himself in his new *spiritual body* to demonstrate the reality that we will all live forever in a spiritual body, because that is what I believe will happen to everyone after their physical body dies.Scripture teaches that the body of Jesus Christ was raised as a spiritual body. Jesus Christ showed himself in his new body to demonstrate the reality of the bodily resurrection
It is not through the teaching of Jesus Christ that people become righteous. It is through repentance, and the indwelling Holy Spirit that people become righteous. Jesus' teaching prepares a person for the coming of the Holy Spirit, but the Holy Spirit, the Comforter, becomes the teacher once he indwells.
True. The body in resurrection is no longer a natural body.I was not aware that Christians believe that Jesus Christ was raised as a spiritual body. I thought Christians all believe that the miracle is that His physical body was raised from the dead. I can believe that Jesus Christ showed himself in his new *spiritual body* to demonstrate the reality that we will all live forever in a spiritual body, because that is what I believe will happen to everyone after their physical body dies.
“The world beyond is as different from this world as this world is different from that of the child while still in the womb of its mother. When the soul attaineth the Presence of God, it will assume the form that best befitteth its immortality and is worthy of its celestial habitation.” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 157
“The answer to the third question is this, that in the other world the human reality doth not assume a physical form, rather doth it take on a heavenly form, made up of elements of that heavenly realm.” Selections From the Writings of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá, p. 194
That is the Word made Flesh, Jesus as Christ is the embodiment of the Word, Jesus lived the Word, the Word is the Essence of the Spirit. The Word is always enmanating from God to us.
We can reflect the Word when we are born again into the Faith given by Christ, God's Messengers.
Regards Tony
One area of difference between us appears to be the Holy Spirit, or Comforter, because the scriptures clearly indicate that the Holy Spirit has no body. The natural resting place of the Comforter is in the heart of man.
I agree with much of what you say, but I wonder why you see the need for more than one Christ. To suggest such a thing is to dethrone Jesus Christ in favour of a false pretender. To a Christian, Jesus Christ is incorruptible and alive. His chosen spiritual teacher is the Holy Spirit, a Spirit that is universally available to those who have faith.
I know those verses and that whole chapter very well.True. The body in resurrection is no longer a natural body.
In 1 Corinthians 15:41-44 it says, 'So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:
It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power:
It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.'
Of course the Holy Spirit has no body.One area of difference between us appears to be the Holy Spirit, or Comforter, because the scriptures clearly indicate that the Holy Spirit has no body. The natural resting place of the Comforter is in the heart of man.
That is why Jesus shows us how the Holy Spirit is connected via the Virgin Birth.
We are born of the Human Spirit given at conception.
Jesus was born of the Holy Spirit, which is eternal, the First and the Last.
There is now much written on this, more than Jesus could tells us, but has now told us.
The Mesengers of God, who are all the Names of God, are the First Cause, they are the Suns that give us light and life.
If we look at our universe we can see that God has created many Sun's, a number we can not compute.
There is now a creation story available that tells it in great detail, it is an amazing read and it shows us how limited our minds are and have confined God to our own limits.
You may like to have a read.
Tablet of the Universe
So to me Jesus as Christ is all the Messengers. To understand this, another Message given by Christ is needed.
Regards Tony
Baha'is also believe that the Comforter is a Title for the man who brings the Holy Spirit. Since God sent the Holy Spirit to Jesus and Jesus bestowed the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles Jesus is called the Comforter.
Abraham showed us that Annointment was obedience.
Moses showed us Annointment was submission to God's Word and Law.
I am open to correction, but I understand that Jesus was born through a miraculous conception. He lived under the law until he was about thirty. Only then did he receive the Holy Spirit, which was sent from above by his Father.
The same Holy Spirit that descended on Jesus at baptism was sent to the disciples at Pentecost. That same Spirit is available now to all who would repent and believe. The difference between Jesus and his disciples is to be reckoned in sinfulness and faith. Jesus was sinless, and his faith was unshakeable. This meant that the Holy Spirit was not given by 'measure'. Nothing blocked or interrupted the work of the Father in the Son.
Sinlessness cannot be claimed of anyone apart from Jesus Christ; even the apostles admitted that they were working towards the perfection of Christ. This means that Baha'u'llah and all other religious leaders fall short of the glory of God. Even with the Holy Spirit working within them, they do not reach the perfect and sinless condition of Christ.
According to the scriptures, Christ is 'Immanuel', or 'God with us'.
Okay, did Hindus misinterpret something in their Scriptures or do their Scriptures clearly spell out what is meant by reincarnation? I don't think it is a misinterpretation. Just like I don't think the resurrection of Jesus was misinterpreted by the early Christians. I think the gospel writers really believed Jesus had come back to life.I read some posts for which I get a notification, but not all of them...
Baha'u'llah did not write about Hinduism or reincarnation.
However, Baha'u'llah wrote about what happens to our soul and its survival after death.
“And now concerning thy question regarding the soul of man and its survival after death. Know thou of a truth that the soul, after its separation from the body, will continue to progress until it attaineth the presence of God, in a state and condition which neither the revolution of ages and centuries, nor the changes and chances of this world, can alter. It will endure as long as the Kingdom of God, His sovereignty, His dominion and power will endure. It will manifest the signs of God and His attributes, and will reveal His loving kindness and bounty.” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 155-156
“If it be faithful to God, it will reflect His light, and will, eventually, return unto Him.” Gleanings, p. 159
“Blessed is the soul which, at the hour of its separation from the body, is sanctified from the vain imaginings of the peoples of the world….” Gleanings, p. 156
If Baha'is believe what Baha'ul'lah wrote, then we have to believe that Hindus are wrong about reincarnation, since the two beliefs are contradictory. In short, Baha'is believe that the soul continues to progress forever in the spiritual world whereas Hindus believe that the soul returns to this world and reincarnates in another body and thereby continues to progress spiritually.
Both beliefs cannot be true, because the beliefs are contradictory.