I found this quote and I am just curious to see people's reactions to it as an intellectual justification for the totalitarian state (the soviet model):
"We are in favour of the withering away of the state, and at the same time we stand for the strengthening of the dictatorship of the proletariat, which represents the most powerful and mighty of all forms of the state which have ever existed up to the present day. The highest possible development of the power of the state, with the object of the withering away of the state: that is the Marxist formula. Is it "contradictory"? Yes, it is "contradictory". But this is a living contradiction and wholly reflects the Marxist dialectic." (Stalin, June 1930).
For those of you who have not mastered Marxist dialectic/double think, the active role of the state serves to consolidate its economic basis, so the strengthening of the state serves to abolish class struggle as the source of social conflict under socialism, thereby eliminating the necessity for the state as a precondition for it withering away as an apparatus of class rule.
If you don't under stand that, repeat after me: 2+2=5
If a politician in your country made such a pronouncement of the necessity of "the highest possible development of the power of the state" how would you React? Does Comrade Stalin have a point? Or would you need to answer that question from a safe distance or in the bathroom after using the facilities?
"We are in favour of the withering away of the state, and at the same time we stand for the strengthening of the dictatorship of the proletariat, which represents the most powerful and mighty of all forms of the state which have ever existed up to the present day. The highest possible development of the power of the state, with the object of the withering away of the state: that is the Marxist formula. Is it "contradictory"? Yes, it is "contradictory". But this is a living contradiction and wholly reflects the Marxist dialectic." (Stalin, June 1930).
For those of you who have not mastered Marxist dialectic/double think, the active role of the state serves to consolidate its economic basis, so the strengthening of the state serves to abolish class struggle as the source of social conflict under socialism, thereby eliminating the necessity for the state as a precondition for it withering away as an apparatus of class rule.
If you don't under stand that, repeat after me: 2+2=5
If a politician in your country made such a pronouncement of the necessity of "the highest possible development of the power of the state" how would you React? Does Comrade Stalin have a point? Or would you need to answer that question from a safe distance or in the bathroom after using the facilities?