GloriaPatri said:
Are they contrary to traditional UUs? I admit I don't know much about UUs.
Did they form that organization because the other UU organizations are too political?
I wouldn't think that they formed the organization because we are too
political. Perhaps they felt we are too partisan. In which case, they may advocate for alternative policies or just that we be aware that there are a diversity of valid viewpoints among us; but I would be very surprised if they were against us being involved in politics completely.
It is entirely in keeping with our tradition to be political. That is, to be involved in politics and to try to get our society to reflect the values that we hold. As a religion that has focused on the needs of
this world (as opposed to a possible next world), being in politics
is an expression of our faith. Unitarian ministers were at the forefront of the call for declaring independance from England. Unitarians and Universalists were active in the abolitionist and suffrage movements, as well as advocating for the Social Gospel. Our involvement in the civil rights movement (where our minister James Reeb was killed) of the 60s, the anti-apartheid movement of the 80s, and our current political involvements now are all within the same proud tradition.
btw, we UUs love the liberation theology movement from Latin America. It's not like Catholics have not been political.